We've provided this printable version of our review for your convenience. Please remember that your shopping clicks support this site. If you think this camera is a good choice for you, please consider returning to the link below to check prices and make a purchase via our shopping links.

Also note that this is just one of the pages from this review. Full reviews have several pages with complete analysis of the many test shots we take with each camera. Feel free to download and print them out to see how the camera will perform for you.

Full Review at: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E5D2/E5D2A.HTM

Like this camera?
Save money online!
Prices as of 04/19/2014
Canon 5D Mark II digital camera image
Save Money!
Canon 5D Mark II

$2999



- That's the average, click to find the BEST price!

Your shopping clicks support this site, help keep the reviews coming!

Canon 5D Mark II RAW Image Quality

We've recently started looking at RAW files converted with dcraw, an excellent freeware raw converter. dcraw usually offers timely support for the latest cameras, but more importantly, it does not apply any noise-reduction, sharpening or other corrections such as geometric distortion correction to the output files. (We found that Adobe Camera Raw still applies some limited noise-reduction when its NR settings are set to zero, and it also applies other corrections depending on the make and model of the camera). There will always be differences between RAW converters, in terms of the sort of de-mosaicing algorithms they use (the processes by which they convert the separate Red, Green, and Blue data sets to an array of full-color RGB pixels), but dcraw seems to use a fairly generic algorithm that delivers good sharpness with relatively few artifacts, and can be counted on to not apply any noise reduction if you don't want it to. (That said, looking at the ISO 25,600 example from the 5D Mark II below, it's clear that dcraw's de-mosaicing approach does have some tendency to produce rectilinear artifacts in response to high noise levels.)

Below are crops from Canon 5D Mark II RAW files compared to RAW files from other 21+ megapixel digital SLRs, converted with dcraw.

Canon 5D Mark II vs Canon 1Ds Mark III, Nikon D3X and Sony A900
RAW (via dcraw), no Noise Reduction, no Sharpening
Simulated Daylight
Canon 5D
Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Mark III
Nikon
D3X
Sony
Alpha A900
I
S
O

5
0
N/A,
ISO 50 not
supported.
I
S
O

1
0
0
I
S
O

2
0
0
I
S
O

4
0
0
I
S
O

8
0
0
I
S
O

1
6
0
0
I
S
O

3
2
0
0
I
S
O

6
4
0
0
N/A,
ISO 6,400 not
supported.
I
S
O

1
2
8
0
0
N/A,
ISO 12,800 not
supported.
N/A,
ISO 12,800 not
supported.
N/A,
ISO 12,800 not
supported.
I
S
O

2
5
6
0
0
N/A,
ISO 25,600 not
supported.
N/A,
ISO 25,600 not
supported.
N/A,
ISO 25,600 not
supported.
Canon 5D
Mark II
Canon 1Ds
Mark III
Nikon
D3X
Sony
Alpha A900

The crops above compare the Canon 5D Mark II's RAW noise performance to that of the Canon 1Ds Mark III, Nikon D3X and Sony A900, across their entire ISO ranges. Noise levels from the four cameras are pretty similar up to and including ISO 400. At ISO 800, we see the two Canons and the Nikon pull away from the Sony by just a hair. At ISO 1600 and above, the Sony appears to be behind the others by roughly a full stop in terms of noise.

Some of you are no doubt wondering if the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has dethroned the Nikon D3 and D700 as the high ISO kings. In the table below, we compare high ISO crops from Canon 5D Mark II RAW files resized to 12-megapixels as well as 5D Mark II sRAW1 crops (10-megapixels), to Nikon D3 and D700 (12-megapixels) RAW file crops.

Canon 5D Mark II vs Nikon D3 and D700
RAW (via dcraw), no Noise Reduction, no Sharpening
Simulated Daylight
Canon 5D Mark II,
Resized RAW
Canon 5D Mark II
sRAW1
Nikon D3
RAW
Nikon D700
RAW
I
S
O

8
0
0
I
S
O

1
6
0
0
I
S
O

3
2
0
0
I
S
O

6
4
0
0
I
S
O

1
2
8
0
0
I
S
O

2
5
6
0
0
Canon 5D Mark II
Resized RAW
Canon 5D Mark II
sRAW1
Nikon D3
RAW
Nikon D700
RAW

To our eyes, the Nikon D3 and D700 still have superior high ISO performance, though the Canon 5D Mark II does amazingly well considering the smaller pixel size. The Canon 5D Mark II's sRAW1 files are cleaner than its full sized files, but they don't contain as much detail as resized 5D Mark II full-res RAW files, or the Nikon D3 or D700 RAW files. They seem to have either have some NR applied, or the interpolation process used to generate the smaller files is causing loss of fine detail and larger chroma noise blotches.