5300. Buried in ink, surrounded by sample prints (and, if you look closely, our solar-powered notebook).
At Kodak's booth we finally got a glimpse of the Goldeneye (and even learned how to spell it). Bring your Bluetooth mobile phone within range of the Goldeneye Bluetooth dongle in a Windows computer's USB port and your phone will ask you if it's OK to transfer its images to the computer.
The computer has to have paired with your phone first, so not any camphone will get that generous offer. But once paired, any time you walk by, you can automatically transfer images off your cell to your computer.
Scanner Bed. Rare look at the scanner bed. you can scan more than one print at a time and get more than one file, too.
They can even be sent automatically to the great gallery in the sky, EasyShare Gallery. Freeing them from that cell phone forever.
Kodak hasn't figured out how to market it yet, but it could just be one more Bluetooth accessory for your cell phone, like a headset.
Ink Cartridges: Color cartridge (top) with 'white' (clear) gloss optimizer. They're a snap to install (bottom).
We finally got a chance to get some pictures of Kodak's new all-in-one inkjet line. The 5300 mid-range model (with the LCD that functions like a mini-kiosk) was on display with its inexpensive replacement ink cartridges.
We also learned a few more things about it.
The company won't disclose printing or scanning resolution, but apparently scanning resolution is 1200 (that's what comes up in the dialog box anyway, we were told).
We also learned the exclusive distribution deal with Best Buy is only for three months. Best Stores are setting up the displays this week and will be selling them right away. After the three month period, other distribution chains will open, although Kodak wasn't naming names.
Business Manager Steve Marzio took us through a demo that reminded us what we saw at Ketchum prior to the announcement. Easy copies (if not perfect duplicates, very very close), fast prints thanks to a half-inch wide printhead, a gloss optimizer in the ink set and a larger color gamut than even dye-based inkjets from HP and Epson.
It was quick, certainly, but there are faster printers. The quality really was stunning, but you can't really evaluate that without images of your own. We had a few test images taken in a bowling alley with flash. The background, which was more than a room away, was dark in the images and the flash did its best to burn out the people in the foreground. We were surprised to see the printer handle those tones pretty well, keeping a little detail in the highlights and opening up the dark shadows.
Copy. Quality (even if it is jus 1200 resolution) was quite good for this copy. The original is on the right. Copy has a bit more magenta (compare left edges).
Making a copy of a print on photo paper was as simple as it sounds. Put the original on the glass, press the copy button and a few seconds later you've got a copy. The copy showed a very slight color shift, nothing worth an adjustment, though.
At the IDC breakfast meeting, the analysts were unconvinced that people at the point of purchase would opt for a printer that costs $50 more just because the ink is cheaper. If they don't print a lot, it could take years to recoup the difference in cost, they pointed out.
Kodak isn't expecting that customer to buy. They're looking for the frequent printer, the one who knows how much ink costs, who would like to print more but restrains themselves. Some people even take the cartridges out of the printer so the kids won't waste ink, one Kodak demonstrator told me.
We'll have to test this before drawing any conclusions, but it sure is worthy of a test.
We stopped at the press room to get copies of the DIMA press releases and ran into Henry Wilhelm of Wilhelm Imaging Research (http://www.wilhelm-research.com). He gave us a copy of his latest report on the permanence of all types of 4x6 prints (http://www.wilhelm-research.com/ist/WIR_IS&T_2007_03_HW.pdf), which he just presented this week at the show.
Wilhelm took a look at how long 4x6 prints last when you display them (as a framed print or just on your refrigerator) and when your store them (say, in an album). He found that your choice of ink and paper can affect the longevity of your print by a factor of 200 times.
One of the most pernicious factors in shortening print life is what he calls "ambient ozone exposure." Also known as gas-fading (from ozone in polluted air), it does its worst damage on prints made with dye-based inks on instant-dry (porous) paper. Kodak's new all-in-ones do use instant-dry paper but with pigment-based inks. But if you buy instant-dry paper (instead of the usual swellable sheets) for your dye-based printer, you risk short print life.
Roughly speaking, framing a print behind glass doubles its life, partly by protecting it from ozone. That isn't always the case, as you can see by comparing the framed and bare bulb columns of the report, but generally true.
An even more surprising factor in print longevity is the brand of ink and paper you buy. We have argued with readers for years about the importance of buying the stuff the printer manufacturer sells. There's a superstition that this is just a way to squeeze more pennies out of your purse and that any ink and paper is about the same as any other. But Wilhelm proves dramatically the difference is significant.
Take the HP Photosmart 145 and 245 printers. He made prints on them using the highest quality, branded materials -- both ink and paper -- he could buy in January from Office Depot, Staples and HP. If you tack them up on your fridge, the Office Depot print will go two months before fading, the Staples print three months and the HP print 32 years. Frame them behind glass and you get four months from the Office Depot print, three years from the Staples print (less than a drugstore print still) and 68 years from the HP print.
Just making a print at a Photosmart Express retail kiosk will last 200 times longer than that Office Depot print made with store-brand ink in a refilled HP 57 cartridge on Office Depot Professional Photo Paper.
Wilhelm notes, "Epson, Hewlett-Packard and Lexmark now manufacture inkjet prints, inks and photo papers for home printing that have higher WIR Display Permanence Ratings than traditional silver-halide color prints." Kodak's dye sub prints (what comes out of those docks) survive the longest at 10 years unprotected and 26 years framed.
Speaking of permanence, we're beginning to fade a bit ourselves. This report was delayed by our departure from Las Vegas. We'll put together a wrap-up with some fun and intriguing images we haven't yet published in our show reports before saying goodbye to PMA. So one more time we'll recommend you stay tuned!
|