Pentax K-3 II Image Quality Comparison

Below are crops from our laboratory Still Life target comparing Pentax K-3 II image quality to its predecessor, the K-3, as well as against several enthusiast interchangeable lens cameras at similar price points or in similar categories: the Canon 70D, Nikon D7200, Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A77 II.

NOTE: These images are from best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera, at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). All cameras in this comparison were shot with our very sharp reference lenses. Clicking any crop will take you to a carrier page where you can click once again to access the full resolution image as delivered straight from the camera. For those interested in working with the RAW files involved, click these links to visit each camera's respective sample image thumbnail page: Pentax K-3 II, Pentax K-3, Canon 70D, Nikon D7200, Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A77 II -- links to the RAW files appear beneath those for the JPEG images, wherever we have them. And remember, you can always go to our world-renowned Comparometer to compare the Pentax K-3 II to any camera we've ever tested!

Pentax K-3 II vs Pentax K-3 at Base ISO

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 100	Pentax K-3 at ISO 100
Given that the Pentax K-3 II and its predecessor share the same 24-megapixel APS-C sensor and PRIME III-branded image processor, it's no surprise they produce virtually identical image quality (at least when the K-3 II's Pixel Shift Resolution mode isn't employed. ;-)

Pentax K-3 II vs Canon 70D at Base ISO

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 100	Canon 70D at ISO 100
At base ISO, the Pentax K-3 II is able to out-resolve the 18-megapixel Canon 70D, and it also produces a crisper, more vibrant image, though both generate some fairly obvious sharpening halos around high-contrast edges. The Canon does however produce more accurate colors in general, and especially in the pink fabric which is too magenta from the Pentax.

Pentax K-3 II vs Nikon D7200 at Base ISO

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 100	Nikon D7200 at ISO 100
Both these 24-megapixel APS-C DSLRs produce very similar levels of detail with low noise levels at base ISO, though the K-3 II actually does a bit better with fine detail in our tricky red-leaf swatch. While colors are a bit more vibrant from the Pentax, the Nikon produces more accurate colors particularly in the pink swatch.

Pentax K-3 II vs Olympus E-M5 II at Base ISO

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 100	Olympus E-M5 II at ISO 200
The Pentax K-3 II is able to resolve slightly more detail than the 16-megapixel Olympus E-M5 II, but not as much as the megapixel numbers would imply (this is partly because of the different aspect ratios of the two sensors). The Olympus image is actually a bit cleaner, but you can tell the camera is working harder to suppress noise. The Pentax reproduces more detail in our difficult red-leaf swatch but the Olympus does better in our pink fabric and produces more pleasing colors in general..

Pentax K-3 II vs Sony A77 II at Base ISO

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 100	Sony A77 II at ISO 100
Both of these 24-megapixel APS-C models produce very similar levels of detail in most areas at base ISO, but the Sony's image is a touch crisper, yet its sharpening algorithm doesn't produce obvious halos around high-contrast edges as seen from the Pentax. The Sony also does better in the fabrics, however the Pentax does begin to resolve the fine thread pattern in the red-leaf fabric while the Sony does not.

Pentax K-3 II vs Pentax K-3 at ISO 1600

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 1600	Pentax K-3 at ISO 1600
As expected, very little difference from the two closely-related Pentax DSLRs here at ISO 1600, with virtually identical image quality. Both really struggle to produce any fine detail in our red-leaf fabric and both reproduce our pink fabric as too magenta, but the newer K-3 II does just slightly less so.

Pentax K-3 II vs Canon 70D at ISO 1600

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 1600	Canon 70D at ISO 1600
The K-3 II still edges out the 70D in terms of resolving power in most areas at ISO 1600, yet its image is slightly cleaner with fewer sharpening artifacts. The Canon however does much better in the red-leaf fabric and continues to produce more accurate colors.

Pentax K-3 II vs Nikon D7200 at ISO 1600

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 1600	Nikon D7200 at ISO 1600
Although resolving power and noise levels are quite similar from these two competitors at ISO 1600, the Nikon D7200 produces a slightly crisper image with a more fine-grained and consistent noise pattern, though sharpening halos are more apparent. This time, it's the Nikon that does better in our tricky red-leaf pattern and it continues to produce better colors.

Pentax K-3 II vs Olympus E-M5 II at ISO 1600

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 1600	Olympus E-M5 II at ISO 1600
The Olympus E-M5 II continues to work hard to produce a cleaner, slightly crisper image here at ISO 1600, but there are more noise reduction and sharpening artifacts. The K-3 II is still able to out-resolve the E-M5 II in most areas but the Olympus is able to render at least some detail in our red-leaf fabric.

Pentax K-3 II vs Sony A77 II at ISO 1600

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 1600	Sony A77 II at ISO 1600
While the A77 II's image is a little cleaner than the K-3 II's, it's quite a bit softer with more noticeable noise reduction artifacts. The Sony does better in both the red-leaf and pink fabrics, though.

Pentax K-3 II vs Pentax K-3 at ISO 3200

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 3200	Pentax K-3 at ISO 3200
Once again, very little difference between the K-3 II and its predecessor here at ISO 3200.

Pentax K-3 II vs Canon 70D at ISO 3200

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 3200	Canon 70D at ISO 3200
Noise is a little lower and more refined-looking from the 70D, but the K-3 II clearly delivers much better detail in our mosaic crop. The Canon however does much better in our red-leaf fabric and again delivers more accurate colors overall.

Pentax K-3 II vs Nikon D7200 at ISO 3200

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 3200	Nikon D7200 at ISO 3200
Both these cameras deliver good detail at ISO 3200, however the Nikon's image is crisper, with higher contrast and a more film-like noise grain as well. The D7200 also does a bit better in our troublesome red-leaf swatch, and again, delivers better colors, but the K-3 II's rendering of the mosaic crop looks a bit more natural with fewer processing artifacts.

Pentax K-3 II vs Olympus E-M5 II at ISO 3200

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 3200	Olympus E-M5 II at ISO 3200
Similar to what we saw at ISO 1600, the E-M5 II manages to produce a cleaner, crisper image with better color at ISO 3200, but fine details suffer from strong noise reduction and sharpening artifacts, giving them an almost painted look in comparison. The Olympus does manage to reproduce a slightly better pattern in our red-leaf swatch, but both really struggle with it at this sensitivity.

Pentax K-3 II vs Sony A77 II at ISO 3200

Pentax K-3 II at ISO 3200	Sony A77 II at ISO 3200
Continuing the trend we saw at ISO 1600, the Sony A77 II produces a cleaner image than the K-3 II at ISO 3200, however it's quite soft with an over-processed look. The red-leaf swatch shows much better "detail", however much of it is false and heavily distorted. Colors are generally better from the Sony, though.

Pentax K-3 II vs. Pentax K-3, Canon 70D, Nikon D7200, Olympus E-M5 II, Sony A77 II

Pentax K-3 II ISO 100 ISO 3200 ISO 6400	Pentax K-3 ISO 100 ISO 3200 ISO 6400	Canon 70D ISO 100 ISO 3200 ISO 6400	Nikon D7200 ISO 100 ISO 3200 ISO 6400	Olympus E-M5 II ISO 200 ISO 3200 ISO 6400	Sony A77 II ISO 100 ISO 3200 ISO 6400
Detail comparison. High-contrast detail is also important, pushing the camera in different ways, so we like to look at it, too. Here, all these cameras do well at base ISO, delivering very good detail and contrast, though the D7200 shows more obvious sharpening halos than the rest. The Pentax K-3 II and K-3 do exhibit a drop in contrast and detail as ISO rises, as do the Canon 70D and Sony A77 II, but it's not too bad even at ISO 6400. The Nikon shows the least loss of detail at ISO 6400 while the Olympus shows the least loss of contrast and sharpness.

 

Pentax K-3 II Print Quality Analysis

Very nice 30 x 40 inch prints up to ISO 200; a good 11 x 14 inch print at ISO 3200; a usable 4 x 6 at ISO 12,800.

ISO 100 and 200 prints look practically indistinguishable from one another, and therefore both ISOs print very nicely up to 30 x 40 inches. Thanks to its 24-megapixel sensor and lack of an optical low-pass filter, the prints here looks fantastic with tons of crisp detail. You're really only limited in print size by how much you're willing to push the sensor's resolving power. Colors are also very vibrant, though we do see a noticeable shift towards magenta in our pink fabric swatch, which we've found is typical of Pentax cameras.

ISO 400 images look very similar, but with just a subtle hint of shadow noise compared to the lower ISOs. There's still a lot of sharp, fine detail, and we're comfortable calling it at 24 x 36 inches here, though we'd be okay with 30 x 40 inches for wall display or for less critical applications.

ISO 800 prints top out at 16 x 20 inches, as noise is surprisingly evident at larger print sizes. Here, 16 x 20 inch prints look the best at this sensitivity with lots of detail and well-controlled noise. A 20 x 30 inch print might be usable for less critical applications, however, as noise isn't too egregious at this size.

ISO 1600 images show a further decrease in fine detail, though detail loss is mainly in areas of lower contrast, such as our tricky red-leaf fabric. Noise is otherwise okay when limiting prints to 13 x 19 inches.

ISO 3200 prints show quite a bit of noise, to our eyes, which limits usable prints to 11 x 14 inches. Here, fine detail is decent, especially in higher contrast areas. An 8 x 10 inch print looks even better, but we're okay going a size larger.

ISO 6400 images top-out at 5 x 7 inch prints as noise has become quite problematic, impacting print quality at larger sizes. Despite the noise, colors still look vibrant.

ISO 12,800 prints just squeak by at 4 x 6 inches. Softness due to noise is certainly an issue, and printing any larger is not advisable.

ISO 25,600/51,200 images are too soft and noisy for our liking and should be avoided for prints.

The 24-megapixel Pentax K-3 II does rather well in our print quality testing, especially at lower ISOs. The camera manages to impress with large, highly detailed prints all the way up to 30 x 40 inches at ISO 100/200 -- or really however large you want to push the sensor. At mid-range ISOs, the K-3 II manages to keep noise in-check for the most part, offering a nice 13 x 19 inch print at ISO 1600 and an 11 x 14 at ISO 3200. At the top end of the ISO scale, noise becomes more of an issue and impacts print sizes noticeably. The K-3 II manages a decent 5 x 7 inch print at ISO 6400 and a usable 4 x 6 at ISO 12,800, but we'd recommend avoiding ISO 25,600-51,200 for prints, as noise and the loss of detail are quite apparent.