Digital Cameras Home Digital Camera Forums and Links About The Imaging Resource and the home page
Dec. 2, 2008
Digital Camera NewsDigital Camera ReviewsDigital Printer ReviewsDigital Scanner ReviewsDigital Camera related Software ReviewsGet Started using your Digital CameraLearn to take better pictures with your Digital CameraHow-To and instructional articles for your Digital Camera

What's New on Our Site - February 2002

 

February 22
Full review posted for Canon EOS-D60!
Who'd have known? It looks like the real fireworks at next week's PMA show will be in the "semi-pro" digital SLR arena. Nikon announced their new 6 megapixel D100 yesterday morning, today it's Canon's turn, with their new 6 megapixel EOS-D60. Neither company has yet committed to a price (looks like one of those "no, after you..." standoffs), but the rumors I've heard on the street suggest that they're going to be *extremely* aggressively priced. You can bet that neither company will take a back seat to the other on pricing for this critical product.

That said, I haven't seen a D100 yet, but have had hands on a prototype D60 now, and am very impressed with resolution and color on it. I had only a single day with a "shootable" unit, and it turned out that there was an exposure-metering problem in that sample that complicated getting good exposures. I do have a moderately complete range of my standard test shots snapped with it, and even a handful of random "non-standard" shots for folks who'd like to see what photos of more "natural" subjects look like. More will likely need to wait for a production-level model, but what's here now makes the camera's potential clear. Color is clear and accurate, and the sensor has the low noise and generally beautiful tonality we first saw in the D30. (The prototype's default tone curve was a tad contrasty however.) And resolution - The D60 now holds the crown of the highest-resolution camera I've tested to date.

All in all, this looks like a really exceptional offering, and you can bet there's going to be some fireworks over pricing: Last year I made much of the D30's obviously highly modular design, and it looks to me like the D60 will reap the benefits of that. It's clearly based on the same body design, which means Canon has had a year or so to work off the engineering costs associated with it. Canon should have a fair bit of room to work the price issue, given that there's really relatively little tooling cost associated with this new unit. - And I fully expect them to take advantage of that fact. Neither Canon nor Nikon have yet shared price information with me, even under nondisclosure, so I'm free to speculate. Even at that, I won't repeat the prices I've heard rumored on the street for the new models. They're so low I don't want to carry *that* much egg on my face if the rumors prove wrong. I do think though, that the prices will startle many in the industry. (I expect Nikon to lead with a price announcement sometime early in the PMA show, and Canon to follow quickly behind. All speculation on my part though, we'll just have to see.) Meanwhile, check out my review of the new D60!

 

 

February 21
First Look review posted for Nikon Coolpix 2500!
I (and no doubt many others) have always thought of Nikon as a "serious" camera company, associating their name with industrial-strength hunks of black-coated titanium and optical glass. The lower end of their Coolpix digicam line has somewhat belied that image over the last year or two though, with products specifically tailored for the more mass-market picture taker. (Witness their very popular Coolpix 775 and 885, for instance.) Now though, they've gone beyond mere ease of use to true style, with what has to be one of the prettiest cameras I've ever reviewed. The new Coolpix 2500 looks like some sort of a cross between a sleek cell phone and a lady's shaver, but whatever you call it is just a delight to look at. At the risk of being labeled a sexist, I'm inclined to think of this as a "girl" camera, but Nikon's imaging heritage guarantees it'll be more than just a pretty face. At this point, I've had hands on a prototype model that was fully functional, but which Nikon wasn't yet done tweaking the image parameters (color, tone, and sharpness processing) , so they asked me not to share photos from it on the site. I did put together a pretty comprehensive First Look on it though. Check it out, this is definitely a camera that begs to be brought along!

 

 

February 20
"First Look" review (with sample photos) posted for Sony DSC-P31!
Well, it's a few days before spring PMA again, and Sony once again leads off the action with a flood of new product announcements - no fewer than *5* this time. The announcements cover three new compact Cyber-shot models, and two new CD Mavicas. First up is the new little DSC-P31, a two megapixel Cyber-shot with a fixed focal length lens. Nice, cheap ("anticipated retail price" is only $220), and what looks like pretty good picture quality as well. (Our test unit was a prototype, but Sony said it would be OK for us to share photos taken with it. Final units may show some improvements in image quality though.) One big departure for Sony is that these new units are powered by NiMH AA cells, rather than Sony's own InfoLITHIUM cells. Too bad to see the InfoLITHIUMs go, they give really long run times, but the NiMH AAs included with the units are very high-capacity (I'll include some limited test data on them on my battery test page after PMA), and the switch doubtless lowers the cost of the cameras. The P31 looks like a great entry-level camera, with more than the usual assortment of features we've come to expect at that price point. Check it out!

 

"First Look" review (NO sample photos though) posted for Sony DSC-P51!
This one is the slightly bigger brother to the DSC-P31. It's also a two megapixel design, with very similar features, but sports a 3x optical zoom lens, and an expected street price of $300. The P51 sample I tested was at an earlier stage of development than the other new models they sent me, so Sony asked me not to share test photos from it yet. - All the rest of the information is there though, and this looks like a nice step up from the P31. (I *really* like zoom lenses, think they add so much to the average person's photography that everyone should spend the little extra to get one.) At $300 though, the P51 will have more competition in the marketplace than the P31, competing against existing units like Fuji's little FinePix 2600, which did very well this last Christmas season. Like the P31, the P51 is also powered by AA batteries, and comes with two of the high-power Sony cells and a charger. Check it out!

 

"First Look" review (with sample photos) posted for Sony DSC-P71!
Yeesh, this is starting to sound repetitive! *This* particular new Cyber-shot sports a three megapixel sensor, a sharp 3x Zeiss lens, and a few more features. It's slated to appear at a retail price of $400. (This is getting really good, isn't it?- Full-featured three megapixel cameras at $400. Pretty neat...) Other specs are similar to the lower end models mentioned above. - And like the others, it has Sony's new "MPEG HQX" technology, which lets you record movies up to the capacity limit of the Memory Stick! (No fixed buffer limits of 5, 10, or 15 seconds. - You can record literally minutes of digital action.) Check it out!

 

Full review posted for Sony CD Mavica MVC-CD250!
Sony's CD Mavica concept made quite a stir when the original MVC-CD1000 appeared almost two years ago now. Last year, they updated and extended the line with the CD200 and CD300. This year, they've both moved the line down in price, and up in features and capabilities. The first new model is the MVC-CD250, a two megapixel successor to the CD200, aimed at bringing CD Mavica technology down the price curve, without sacrificing features. (Introductory price is stated as "around $600.") Feature-wise, the CD250 is very similar to the CD200 before it, but with two important additions. First, it has a huge (about 8 frame) buffer memory, so cycle times are *very* good. What's more, the buffer memory allowed a "confirm before write" mode, in which you can examine each photo after you take it, to decide whether you want to burn it onto the CD or not. Both of these features topped the list of requests from former CD Mavica owners, and constitute a big boost to the technology, IMHO. The other significant addition is that these latest CD Mavicas use Sonys new MPEG HQX technology to permit continuous video recording direct to the CD. - This gives nearly 6 minutes of highest-quality video (with audio), and as much as 89 minutes (!) in the low-resolution "SQ" mode. Zounds! Not quite a digital camcorder (Sonys dedicated camcorders capture higher quality video and (particularly) audio, and are more versatile as well), but it's still a long step in the direction of true "convergence" products. Very cool, check the review for all the details!

 

Full review (with sample photos) posted for Sony CD Mavica MVC-CD400!
Phew, finally at the end of Sony postings! This is a real corker to end with though, a true "enthusiasts" camera using CD-Mavica technology. With a 4 megapixel sensor and Carl Zeiss lens, the MVC-CD400 certainly has the chops to qualify in the image-quality department. It doesn't stop there though, as there are a host of other innovations and features as well. First among these are the huge buffer memory, confirm-before-write mode, and looong movie recording. "But that's not all..." as they say on the infomercials. - Sony has also added their Hologram AF technology first seen on the F707, permitting flawless focusing in pitch darkness. And (a drum roll, please) ... A flash hot shoe! - This has been a personal crusade for me, trying to convince Sony to add a hot shoe or other provision for a generic flash unit to their cameras, probably the most frequent request I've seen from our readers relative to Sony's higher-end cameras. The CD400 still has a connection for Sony's own (very nice) little HVL-F1000 external flash, but now also supports the use of generic "dumb" strobes, as well as studio strobe units (provided they have a low, safe trigger voltage). I admit I'm a little strange, but it was actually exciting to plug my old Sunpak cheapie auto-strobe atop the CD400 for our "indoor portrait" test. Worked like a champ! Big kudos to Sony for finally opening up their cameras for use with a full range of external strobe devices! Check the review for all the details and sample photos as well! (Oh - right, the price: "Around $900," a pretty good price point given all the capabilities and CD Mavica technology as well.


 

February 16
Full review of Olympus C-3020 posted!
I've had a lot of email asking about this one, as it took Olympus a little while to get me a unit to test. I've finished reviewing it though, and now (finally) have that review posted. The C-3020 is a replacement for Oly's very popular C-3000 model, long one of my favorite recommendations to friends looking for a good deal on a fully-featured digicam. The 3020 fills a niche with few real competitors, as a bargain-priced three megapixel camera, but one having a very full feature set. About all that's missing relative to the higher-end C-3040 Olympus model is an external flash connection, and a bit less buffer memory. (Oh, and no sound recording for its movies.) It's a great "enthusiast" camera, as it has a raft of features like spot metering, aperture or shutter priority metering, and a full manual mode. Takes good pictures too, and the list price is only $599. Check it out!


 

February 8
Full Review posted for Fuji FinePix 2800!
I reviewed the Fuji 2600 Zoom last year and really liked what I saw. That model offers about the best deal on the market for a two megapixel, 3x zoom-equipped camera that takes good pictures. The 2800 uses much the same CCD and electronics, but couples it to a 6x zoom lens for a retail price only $100 more than that of the 2600. This makes it the best deal going for a camera with a 6x zoom lens, and the photo quality is very much on a par with the 2600. If you want more than the typical 3x zoom, but have a tight budget, the 2800 Zoom would make an excellent choice. Check it out!


 

February 1 1/2
Catchup: REALLY low light shots, EOS-1D, Nikon 5000, Olympus E20!

This seems to be catchup week at IR, as I'm finally clearing a lot of things from my long-term "to-do" list. Today, it meant posting the results of some *really* long time exposures I shot a little while back with several high-end digicams. The shot at right is the obligatory "river of lights" freeway shot, taken with the Canon EOS-1D, while the others (shot with the Nikon 5000 and Olympus E20 were taken in my backyard. (The EOS was the only one with a lens that'd stop down enough to let me shoot the 2 minute + exposure I was aiming for with the freeway shot.) The results are interesting, and I found it quite amazing that we could actually contemplate 2 minute exposures with a digicam! To see what the results looked like for each camera, check out the picture-index pages for the Canon EOS-1D, Nikon Coolpix 5000, and Olympus Camedia E-20N! (Note that you'll need to scroll toward the bottom of each page to see the ultra-low light shots.)


More Catchup: External flash shots with Sony F707. (And connector dimensions!)
Another catchup item: I've finally posted a test shot taken with Sony's nice little HVL-F1000 external flash unit on the F707. While I'm generally no fan of proprietary flash connections, I have to admit that the HVL-F1000 has some things going for it, most particuarly that it apparently offers true TTL (through the lens) flash metering when used with the F707. The lack of TTL metering is one of the real deficiencies of prosumer digicams generally - Virtually all use area sensors to meter the flash. Area sensors work OK if your subject and background have the same reflectance, but not at all if you're zoomed in on a light subject against a dark background (for instance). The HVL-F1000 seems to do a nice job overall. Given my dislike for closed systems though, I went as far as to carefully measure all the critical dimensions on the F1000's sync plug. - This is an unusual four-circuit miniature phone plug, a configuration I've not seen before. The flash itself uses a serial protocol to communicate with the camera, via circuits A and B on the connector diagram at right. (Click on the thumbnail for a large-scale drawing.) Click here to see an example of what the F707 can do with the HVL-F1000 in my standard indoor flash test. (Very nice.)

 

February 1
Inkjet Paper Review: MediaStreet.com's Offerings!
Recently, a friend of mine who runs a well-known internet/mailorder photo products business asked me to evaluate a range of inkjet papers made by MediaStreet.com. He was interested in carrying the papers himself, but wanted an objective third-party test of them first. He needed to know how compatible they were with different printers, and how well they worked overall. Ever helpful, I said "Sure, I'll get right on it", completely ignoring the typically absurd backlog of other projects I had burning my toes at the time. It's thus now several months later, but I finally did have a look at the MediaStreet papers, and ended up quite impressed. Figuring that something approaching 100% of our readers are inkjet users, I thought I'd write up the results of my testing to show on the IR site. This article is a brief digest of several weeks of off-and-on testing of a variety of MediaStreet's papers. The bottom line? I was so impressed with MediaStreet's papers that I invited them to become a site sponsor of the Imaging Resource: I'm very comfortable recommending them to all and sundry as an excellent line of third-party papers, offering both a wider range of surfaces and better prices than most manufacturer's proprietary formulations. Check it out!

 

"First Look" review posted of Minolta Dimage S404!
Last year, Minolta made a lot of waves in the high-end consumer digicam arena, first with the introduction of their Dimage 7 and Dimage 5 cameras, and later with the intro of their more bargain-priced (but still very full-featured) Dimage S304. Now, they've updated the S304 with a four megapixel sensor, keeping all the other "Dimage" technology, including the excellent 4x optical zoom lens and very fine-grained control over contrast and color rendition. I've just finished testing a prototype of the S404, and have posted a "first look" review of it. - No photos to share yet (the color hasn't been tweaked to final specs yet), but I did test and report on viewfinder accuracy, resolution, lens distortion, and minimum macro coverage. Check it out, stay tuned for a full review (including test photos) as soon as I can get my hands on a "shootable" sample!

 

 

Return to Top




This document copyright © 1998 - 2008, The Imaging Resource, all rights reserved. Visitors to this site may download this document for local, private, non-commercial use. Individuals who have themselves downloaded this page may print a copy on their personal printers for convenience of reading and reference. Other than this explicit usage, it may not be published, reproduced, or distributed in print or electronic and/or digital media without the express written consent of

Search | SiteMap | About Us | Advertising | Press Kit | Privacy Policy | Home

Digital Camera Wholesalers | Sony digital Cameras | digital cameras at low prices

Search this Site
 
SiteMap

What's New!
Main Page

What's New!
Archives

2008

January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008

2007

January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007

2006

January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006

 

2005

January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

 

2004

January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004

 

2003

January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003

 

2002

January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002

 

2001

January 2001
February 2001
March 2001
April 2001
May 2001
June 2001
July 2001
August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001

 

2000

May 2000
June 2000
July 2000
August 2000
September 2000
October 2000
November 2000
December 2000