• 1/2.3 inch 28.1mm2
  • 16.1 megapixels
  • 24.00mm - 2000.00mm (35mm eq.)
  • 1 inch 116.2mm2
  • 20.1 megapixels
  • 24.00mm - 600.00mm (35mm eq.)

Buy From

Differences

Nikon P900 advantages over Sony RX10 IV

  • Less expensive
    $580 vs $1698
    Save money for lenses or accessories
  • Tilt-swivel screen
    Tilt-swivel vs tilt-only
    Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
  • Fast startup
    ~1.20 vs 1.9 sec
    Faster startup lets you catch the moment
  • More telephoto lens reach
    2,000 mm vs 600 mm
    Capture objects farther away
  • Built-in GPS
    GPS vs None
    Geotag your photos
  • Lacks anti-aliasing filter
    No Filter vs Filter
    Enjoy sharper photos

Sony RX10 IV advantages over Nikon P900

  • Larger sensor
    1 inch vs 1/2.3 inch
    More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
  • Slower slow-motion
    1000 fps vs 120 fps
    Supports slower slow-mo
  • Bigger pixels
    ~ 2.41 vs 1.34 microns
    Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
  • Shoot 4K video
    4K (UHD) vs 1080p
    Make sure you have a fast computer
  • Touchscreen
    Touch vs No touch
    Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
  • Larger lens aperture
    f/2.4 vs f/2.8
    Take photos in low-light or isolate your subject
  • RAW file ability
    Yes vs No
    Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
  • Built-in Bluetooth
    Yes vs No
    Always-on wireless connectivity
  • On-sensor phase detect
    Yes vs No
    Usually improves live view and video AF performance
  • Top deck display
    Yes vs No
    Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
  • External Mic Jack
    Jack vs No jack
    Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
  • Newer
    1 month vs 3 years old
    Newer cameras often support more advanced features
  • Shoots 24p video
    Yes vs No
    Gives your movies a big-screen feel
  • Higher-res screen
    480k vs 230k pixels
    More detail on the screen lets you judge focus and composition
  • Hot shoe
    Hot shoe vs None
    Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
  • More pixels
    20.1 vs 16.1 megapixels
    Higher resolution photos
  • Headphone jack
    Yes vs No
    Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
  • Has anti-aliasing filter
    Filter vs No Filter
    Reduces unsightly moiré in photos
  • Longer exposure
    30 vs 15 sec
    Long exposures for night shots
  • Bulb shutter
    Bulb vs No bulb
    Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
  • Faster JPEG shooting
    23.8 fps vs 7.1 fps
    Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
  • Bigger JPEG buffer
    217 vs 7 shots
    Take more JPEG shots before waiting (burst mode)
  • Faster shutter
    1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec
    Shoot wide open in bright light
  • Higher extended ISO
    25600 vs 12800 ISO
    Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

  • Focus peaking
    Both provide
    Your camera will highlight what's in focus
  • Eye-level viewfinder
    Both provide
    You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
    Both provide
    Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
  • In-camera panoramas
    Both provide
    Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
    Both provide
    Share your photos wirelessly
  • NFC
    Both provide
    Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
  • Internal flash
    Both provide
    Useful in a pinch for fill flash
  • Manual focus
    Both provide
    AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
  • HDMI out
    Both provide
    Use an external screen to monitor or review video
  • Slow-motion videos
    Both provide
    Shoot slow-motion videos

Common Weaknesses

  • Integrated ND filter
    Neither provide
    Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter

User reviews

Buy From

Review Excerpt

  • Farthest zoom reach for a fixed lens camera (2000mm eq.); Good image quality for its class; Good vibration reduction; Fast aperture at wide angle (f/2.8); Excellent value for the price.

  • No RAW file recording; Limited capabilities in low light, including struggling with autofocus; Lens not as sharp at full tele end; No hot shoe.

The Competition

Compared to Samsung WB2200F

Nikon P900
Samsung WB2200F
  • $625
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Focus peaking
  • Tilt-swivel screen
  • $525
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Slower slow-motion
  • Longer stills battery life
Sony RX10 IV
Samsung WB2200F
  • $1698
  • 1 inch
  • Focus peaking
  • Larger sensor
  • $525
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • More telephoto lens reach
  • Longer stills battery life

Compared to Fujifilm S9900W

Nikon P900
Fujifilm S9900W
  • $625
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Tilt-swivel screen
  • NFC
  • $450
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Slower slow-motion
Sony RX10 IV
Fujifilm S9900W
  • $1698
  • 1 inch
  • Slower slow-motion
  • Larger sensor
  • $450
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More telephoto lens reach

Compared to Fujifilm S9800

Nikon P900
Fujifilm S9800
  • $625
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Tilt-swivel screen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $556
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Slower slow-motion
  • Longer stills battery life
Sony RX10 IV
Fujifilm S9800
  • $1698
  • 1 inch
  • Slower slow-motion
  • Larger sensor
  • $556
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More telephoto lens reach

Compared to Sony RX10 III

Nikon P900
Sony RX10 III
  • $625
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Tilt-swivel screen
  • $1298
  • 1 inch
  • Larger sensor
  • Slower slow-motion
Sony RX10 IV
Sony RX10 III
  • $1698
  • 1 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Bluetooth
  • $1298
  • 1 inch
  • Less expensive

Compared to Panasonic FZ2500

Nikon P900
Panasonic FZ2500
  • $625
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Fast startup
  • $998
  • 1 inch
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
Sony RX10 IV
Panasonic FZ2500
  • $1698
  • 1 inch
  • Slower slow-motion
  • Larger lens aperture
  • $998
  • 1 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Tilt-swivel screen
Compare Other Cameras?