• APS-H 476.1mm2
  • 25.6 megapixels
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Medium format 1,441.0mm2
  • 51.4 megapixels
  • ISO 100 - 12,800

Buy From

Differences

Sigma sd Quattro H advantages over Fujifilm GFX

  • Less expensive
    $999 vs $6499
    Save money for lenses or accessories
  • On-sensor phase detect
    Yes vs No
    Usually improves live view and video AF performance
  • Lighter weight
    635g vs 920g
    Lighter weight
  • Doesn't require an AA filter
    Yes vs No
    A unique sensor design provides sharp photos without moiré
  • Faster RAW shooting
    4.4 fps vs 3.0 fps
    Faster RAW shooting in burst mode

Fujifilm GFX advantages over Sigma sd Quattro H

  • Larger sensor
    Medium format vs APS-H
    More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
  • Bigger pixels
    ~ 5.31 vs 4.30 microns
    Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
  • Touchscreen
    Touch vs No touch
    Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
  • Tiltable Screen
    Tiltable vs Fixed
    Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi vs None
    Share your photos wirelessly
  • Top deck display
    Yes vs No
    Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
  • External Mic Jack
    Jack vs No jack
    Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
  • Shoots 24p video
    Yes vs No
    Gives your movies a big-screen feel
  • More dots on screen
    2360k vs 1620k dots
    Can mean greater resolution or a brighter screen
  • Shoots 1080p video
    Yes vs No
    You'll want this if you shoot video
  • More pixels
    51.4 vs 25.6 megapixels
    Higher resolution photos
  • Dual card slots
    Yes vs No
    Gives you more storage flexibility
  • Headphone jack
    Yes vs No
    Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
  • Longer exposure
    3600 vs 30 sec
    Long exposures for night shots
  • Bigger RAW buffer
    21 vs 8 shots
    Larger buffer for RAW shots (burst mode)
  • Faster shutter
    1/16000 vs 1/4000 sec
    Shoot wide open in bright light
  • Higher extended ISO
    102400 vs 6400 ISO
    Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

  • Focus peaking
    Both provide
    Your camera will highlight what's in focus
  • Eye-level viewfinder
    Both provide
    You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
  • HDMI out
    Both provide
    Use an external screen to monitor or review video
  • Hot shoe
    Both provide
    Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
  • Bulb shutter
    Both provide
    Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Common Weaknesses

  • Tilt-swivel screen
    Neither provide
    Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
    Neither provide
    Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
  • In-camera panoramas
    Neither provide
    Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
  • NFC
    Neither provide
    Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
  • Built-in Bluetooth
    Neither provide
    Always-on wireless connectivity
  • Built-in GPS
    Neither provide
    Geotag your photos
  • Internal flash
    Neither provide
    Useful in a pinch for fill flash
  • Slow-motion videos
    Neither provide
    Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Buy From

Review Excerpt

  • Fantastic image quality across the board; Excellent RAW dynamic range; Superb high ISO performance; Functional and user-friendly body; Robust weather-sealed construction; Detachable EVF; Tilting touchscreen; Very good lens quality.

  • Slow AF speeds; Performance can't compete with high-end full-frame cameras; Limited native lens selection so far; Expensive accessories; Unimpressive JPEG dynamic range; 1/125s maximum flash sync.

The Competition

Compared to Sigma sd Quattro

Sigma sd Quattro H
Sigma sd Quattro
  • $999
  • APS-H
  • Larger sensor
  • More viewfinder magnification
  • $657
  • APS-C
  • Less expensive
  • Bigger RAW buffer
Fujifilm GFX
Sigma sd Quattro
  • $6499
  • Medium format
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
  • $657
  • APS-C
  • Less expensive
  • On-sensor phase detect

Compared to Hasselblad X1D

Sigma sd Quattro H
Hasselblad X1D
  • $999
  • APS-H
  • Less expensive
  • On-sensor phase detect
  • $8995
  • Medium format
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
Fujifilm GFX
Hasselblad X1D
  • $6499
  • Medium format
  • Less expensive
  • Tiltable Screen
  • $8995
  • Medium format
  • Built-in GPS
  • Higher max flash sync

Compared to Fujifilm X-T2

Sigma sd Quattro H
Fujifilm X-T2
  • $999
  • APS-H
  • Less expensive
  • Larger sensor
  • $1499
  • APS-C
  • Lens selection
  • Shoot 4K video
Fujifilm GFX
Fujifilm X-T2
  • $6499
  • Medium format
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
  • $1499
  • APS-C
  • Less expensive
  • Shoot 4K video

Compared to Canon EOS M5

Sigma sd Quattro H
Canon EOS M5
  • $999
  • APS-H
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
  • $929
  • APS-C
  • Touchscreen
  • Tiltable Screen
Fujifilm GFX
Canon EOS M5
  • $6499
  • Medium format
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
  • $929
  • APS-C
  • Less expensive
  • NFC

Compared to Sony A7R III

Sigma sd Quattro H
Sony A7R III
  • $999
  • APS-H
  • Less expensive
  • Doesn't require an AA filter
  • $3198
  • 35mm
  • Lens selection
  • Larger sensor
Fujifilm GFX
Sony A7R III
  • $6499
  • Medium format
  • Larger sensor
  • Bigger pixels
  • $3198
  • 35mm
  • Less expensive
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
Compare Other Cameras?