Sigma fp vs Nikon Z50

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sigma fp vs Nikon Z50

35mm 858.0mm²
24.6 megapixels
ISO 100 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Sigma fp Review.
See real-world photos taken with the fp.

APS-C 369.0mm²
20.9 megapixels
ISO 100 - 51,200

Go in depth with our full Nikon Z50 Review.
See real-world photos taken with the Z50.

Buy From

Differences

Sigma fp advantages over Nikon Z50

Larger sensor
35mm vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Bigger pixels
~ 5.98 vs 4.22 microns
Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
Thinner
45 mm vs 60 mm
Thinner
More dots on screen
2100k vs 1037k dots
Can mean greater resolution or a brighter screen
More pixels
24.6 vs 20.9 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Faster JPEG shooting
18.0 fps vs 11.0 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Faster RAW shooting
18.0 fps vs 11.0 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Faster shutter
1/8000 vs 1/4000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light

Nikon Z50 advantages over Sigma fp

Less expensive
$997 vs $1599
Save money for lenses or accessories
Eye-level viewfinder
Eye-level vs Rear display only
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
Tiltable Screen
Tiltable vs Fixed
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Yes vs No
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Higher max flash sync
1/200 vs 1/30 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots
Higher extended ISO
204800 vs 102400 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Shoot 4K video
Both provide
Make sure you have a fast computer
Touchscreen
Both provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
External Mic Jack
Both provide
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Slow-motion videos
Both provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

Common Weaknesses

Tilt-swivel screen
Neither provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
In-camera panoramas
Neither provide
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read fp User Reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read Z50 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sigma fp

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 45mm f/2.8 lens

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Nikon Z50

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 16-50mm and 50-250mm Lenses
Kit with 16-50mm Lens

Review Excerpt

We haven’t finished our review of the Sigma fp, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Sigma fp Shooter's Report

We haven’t finished our review of the Nikon Z50, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Nikon Z50 Shooter's Report

The Competition

Compared to Canon EOS M50

Sigma fp

Canon EOS M50

$1672
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$579
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Sigma fp vs Canon EOS M50

Nikon Z50

Canon EOS M50

$857
APS-C

Larger sensor
Longer stills battery life

$579
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Nikon Z50 vs Canon EOS M50

Compared to Canon EOS RP

Sigma fp

Canon EOS RP

$1672
35mm

Focus peaking
Less expensive

$999
35mm

Tilt-swivel screen
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma fp vs Canon EOS RP

Nikon Z50

Canon EOS RP

$857
APS-C

Focus peaking
Less expensive

$999
35mm

Tilt-swivel screen
Larger sensor

Compare Nikon Z50 vs Canon EOS RP

Compared to Sony A7C

Sigma fp

Sony A7C

$1672
35mm

Less expensive
Thinner

$1665
35mm

Tilt-swivel screen
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma fp vs Sony A7C

Nikon Z50

Sony A7C

$857
APS-C

Less expensive
More telephoto lens reach

$1665
35mm

Larger sensor
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Nikon Z50 vs Sony A7C

Compared to Fujifilm X-S10

Sigma fp

Fujifilm X-S10

$1672
35mm

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$933
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Sigma fp vs Fujifilm X-S10

Nikon Z50

Fujifilm X-S10

$857
APS-C

Less expensive
Wider angle kit lens

$933
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Slower slow-motion

Compare Nikon Z50 vs Fujifilm X-S10

Compared to Sigma fp L

Sigma fp

Sigma fp L

$1672
35mm

Bigger pixels
Higher max flash sync

$2499
35mm

Newer
More pixels

Compare Sigma fp vs Sigma fp L

Nikon Z50

Sigma fp L

$857
APS-C

Eye-level viewfinder
Tiltable Screen

$2499
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Nikon Z50 vs Sigma fp L

Compare Other Cameras?