Sony A65 vs Samsung NX2000

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sony A65 vs Samsung NX2000

APS-C 369.7mm²
24.3 megapixels
ISO 100 - 16,000

Go in depth with our full Sony A65 Review.
See real-world photos taken with the A65.

APS-C 369.0mm²
20.3 megapixels
ISO 100 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Samsung NX2000 Review.

Buy From

Differences

Sony A65 advantages over Samsung NX2000

Tilt-swivel screen
Tilt-swivel vs none
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Lens selection
Good vs Limited
Better lens selection gives you more options
Eye-level viewfinder
Eye-level vs Rear display only
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Built-in GPS
GPS vs None
Geotag your photos
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

510 vs 340 shots
Capture more photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
More pixels
24.3 vs 20.3 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Wider angle kit lens
27 mm vs 30 mm
Capture more of the scene with the included lens
Faster JPEG shooting
10.0 fps vs 8.0 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)

Samsung NX2000 advantages over Sony A65

Less expensive
$650 vs $1000 (MSRP)
Save money for lenses or accessories
Touchscreen
Touch vs No touch
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
Higher effective ISO

Higher effective ISO

Maximum effective ISO is an estimate of the highest sensitivity at which a camera can capture excellent quality photos.

Cameras with higher effective ISO will be better choices for indoor photography, night shooting, and indoor sports photography, especially if you intend to make large prints.

You can learn more at our glossary entry.

Maximum effective ISO test data courtesy of DxO Mark.
NX2000 test data on DxO Mark A65 test data on DxO Mark

908 vs 717 iso
Take photos in low light with less noise
Thinner
35 mm vs 80 mm
Thinner

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
In-camera panoramas
Both provide
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Common Weaknesses

Built-in Bluetooth
Neither provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Neither provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Slow-motion videos
Neither provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read A65 User Reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read NX2000 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sony A65

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 18-55m Lens

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Samsung NX2000

Kit with 20-50mm Lens

Kit with 20-50mm Lens
Kit with 20-50mm and 50-200mm Lenses

All NX2000 Deals

Review Excerpt

We haven’t reviewed the Sony A65.
Read our Sony A65 Initial Test

We haven’t finished our review of the Samsung NX2000, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
See our Samsung NX2000 First Shots

The Competition

Compared to Samsung NX210

Sony A65

Samsung NX210

$798
APS-C

Lens selection
Tilt-swivel screen

$400
APS-C

Built-in Wi-Fi
Thinner

Compare Sony A65 vs Samsung NX210

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX210

$680
APS-C

Less expensive
Touchscreen

$400
APS-C

External Mic Jack
Wider angle kit lens

Compare Samsung NX2000 vs Samsung NX210

Compared to Nikon D3200

Sony A65

Nikon D3200

$798
APS-C

Focus peaking
Tilt-swivel screen

$477
APS-C

Lens selection
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Nikon D3200

Samsung NX2000

Nikon D3200

$680
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$477
APS-C

Lens selection
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Samsung NX2000 vs Nikon D3200

Compared to Nikon D5200

Sony A65

Nikon D5200

$798
APS-C

Focus peaking
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$500
APS-C

Lens selection
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Nikon D5200

Samsung NX2000

Nikon D5200

$680
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$500
APS-C

Lens selection
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Samsung NX2000 vs Nikon D5200

Compared to Sony A58

Sony A65

Sony A58

$798
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Built-in GPS

$598
APS-C

Less expensive
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Sony A58

Samsung NX2000

Sony A58

$680
APS-C

Touchscreen
Built-in Wi-Fi

$598
APS-C

Lens selection
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Samsung NX2000 vs Sony A58

Compared to Samsung NX3300

Sony A65

Samsung NX3300

$798
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Lens selection

$550
APS-C

Built-in Wi-Fi
Thinner

Compare Sony A65 vs Samsung NX3300

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX3300

$680
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$550
APS-C

Tiltable Screen
Lacks anti-aliasing filter

Compare Samsung NX2000 vs Samsung NX3300

Compare Other Cameras?