Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA

Lens Reviews / Pentax Lenses i Not yet tested
18-250mm $525
average price
image of Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA

(From Pentax literature) Pentax Imaging Company is pleased to announce the smc Pentax DA 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF] interchangeable zoom lens designed for exclusive use with Pentax digital SLR cameras. With an approximate 14X zoom ratio covering from wide-angle to super-telephoto ranges, this versatile lens handles a great variety of applications from wide-angle landscapes to close-up sporting events and wildlife photography.

Key Features:

  • 14x zoom range of 18-250mm makes this the ideal all-around lens
  • ED element and two aspherical elements compensate for chromatic and spherical aberration
  • Focal length equivalent to 27.5mm to 383mm in the 35mm format
  • Lens focuses as close as 18 inches throughout the entire zoom range
  • Internal focus mechanism prevents the front lens element and lens barrels from moving during focusing

The Pentax 18-250mm lens will ship in October 2007 for US$499.95.

Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA

Pentax 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 ED AL IF SMC DA User Reviews

7.0/10 average of 2 review(s) Build Quality 6.5/10 Image Quality 7.0/10
  • 9 out of 10 points and recommended by Waratah (5 reviews)
    Versatile, pretty well built, great photos in right conditions
    Slow, not weather resistant

    I think I was blessed with a great copy of this lens. It produces shots damn near as good as the 50-135.

    Wish it was weather resistant.

    Fairly slow focus but that's less of an issue on the k5II than the k200d.

    Always feels better knowing this lens is available - whatever I'm shooting from models to landscapes - even if its buried deep in my pack sometimes.

    reviewed June 22nd, 2013
  • 5 out of 10 points and recommended by halways (1 reviews)
    light weight, wide range of focal length, great travel lens for reasonable cost
    not great for low level light, significant vignetting at wide angle and low light, looses significant sharpness at larger aperatures

    I have always enjoyed the Pentax film cameras and was pleased when the K10D arrived (I went Canon 20D because I wasn't sold on the early Pentax DSLRs), allowing me to use my Takumar lenses. However when the Pentax 18-250 came available I thought it would be great to cut down the weight and the lens switching. To date it has served well as a travel lens but returning from recent trip to Europe and processing over 1000 images I began to notice that low light wide angle shots (lots of these in the narrow streets and indoor museums and galleries) that the sharpness suffered and vignetting was significant. Also, the lens hood has become difficult to put on and off as the two plastic surfaces seem to bind on one another.

    Since I still have my Takumar lenses I did a series of test shots comparing the two lenses. (Takumar 70-200 and the Pentax 18-250)

    At 70mm and max aperature the Takumar is significanlty sharper, no vignetting on either lense
    At 100mm difference in sharpness greater
    At 200mm the difference even greater again

    A similiar test comparing Takumar 35-70 with the wider angle focal lengths on the Pentax 18-250 using focal length at 35 and 70mm showed in addition to less sharpness on the 18-250 but also significant vignetting.

    Overall, for travel I will continue to use the light weight combo of the 10D and 18-250 lense (3lb total weight) and avoid extreme wide angle and large aperature use as much as possible, however, for more serious imaging I think I will stick with my Takumar lenses, At least until Pentax offers a series of higher quality lenses I will put off my upgrade to a K20D or newer Pentax camera or possibly consider a move back to Canon or perhaps consider Nikon.

    Similiar test images using my Canon 18-85 f4-5.6 and the EF 70-200 F2.8 showed slightly better results that the Takumar. The Canon weight and bulk makes it less attractive for travel.

    reviewed December 10th, 2008 (purchased for $525)