Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports

Lens Reviews / Sigma Lenses i Not yet tested
150-600mm $1,749
average price
image of Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports

(From Sigma lens literature) Designed and executed for the most demanding types of photography, the Sigma 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG HSM OS Sports lens is the new standard for telephoto zooms. Boasting 2 FLD glass elements (performance equal to fluorite) and 3 SLD glass elements, the new Sigma 150-600mm Sport produces incredibly sharp images y through the entire zoom range. Chromatic aberration is controlled at the long end of the focal length through the optimized design of the glass elements and a dust and splash proof construction ensures a high degree of durability. An updated optical stabilizer (OS) features an accelerometer for improved panning photography both horizontally and vertically, essential for birding, wildlife and motorsports photography. The Sigma 150-600 Sports also touts a new zoom lock switch that can be locked at any focal length and a new manual override (MO) switch is incorporated as an option which is activated by rotating the focus ring while using the autofocus. This state-of-the-art lens is equipped with advanced Sigma technology including an optimized, quieter AF, water/oil repellent coating on front and rear elements and Mount Conversion service compatibility. As with all Sport line lenses, the Sigma 150-600 works with the Sigma USB dock for maximum customization allowing for firmware updates and adjustments to the focus limiter, AF speed and OS view.

Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports User Reviews

10.0/10 average of 2 review(s) Build Quality 10.0/10 Image Quality 10.0/10
  • 10 out of 10 points and recommended by SteveRemy (2 reviews)

    I purchased this lens in March 2022 with some trepidation as one of the local Melbourne camera stores was offering a great deal. I was eyeing a Nikon 600mm F4 second hand but that was still unaffordable so biting the bullet, I opted for the Sigma 150-600mm OS HSM Sports that came with the Sigma TC-1401 teleconverter. I do a lot of amateur football sports photography and need a lens that can give me a maximum focal distance - I have a Nikon 200-500mm F5.6 that has done the job admirably and I recently rented a Nikon 500mm F4 that is breathtakingly sharp (which made it hard to go back to the Nikon 200-500mm zoom). For those who are unfamiliar with Australian Rules football (AFL), the oval (or football ground) is huge almost double the size of a soccer or American NFL pitch which makes it difficult to capture the play that is on the opposite side of the ground. A professional AFL game is usually covered by at least two sports photographers, one at each end of the ground but at an amateur game only one. I've used the Sigma 150-600mm OS HSM Sports only once so far for sport and was impressed by the sharpness and autofocus response which is on par with the Nikon 200-500mm F5.6 (though a not as quick as the Nikon 500mm F4). However the weight of the lens is an issue (for me) even with a monopod and I will need a little more practice to get used to keeping the lens stable but the in-built optical stabiliser does a great job in keeping the image sharp as tested with the Nikon D5. In this regard, I would recommend the Sigma 150-600mm OS HSM Sports for amateur sports photography as the results are great.

    I have also done some extensive field tests using the lens with my Nikon D800, D850 and D5 and the results are amazing hand holding the lens. At a shutter speeds of 250-2000th/sec and ISO between 200-4000, the image quality is amazing and crisp and bokeh superb - on par (I think) with prime lenses and with little to no vignetting. The minimum F-Stop of 6.3 at 600mm is not an issue and with the TC-1401 teleconverter, this is further reduced to F9 minimum and again, not an issue (for me) as the images are still super sharp. Wildlife and macro photographers will not be disappointed with the clarity this lens delivers.

    I've read and watched a few reviews on the Sigma 150-600mm OS Sports with reviews mixed on the quality of the images - in my view, I think Sigma has quietly improved the build quality in recent years resulting in improved image quality as I can't fault this lens since I started using it.

    reviewed April 15th, 2022 (purchased for $1,680)
  • 10 out of 10 points and recommended by Tord (30 reviews)
    Lovely sharpness, fast focusing, water-resistant.
    Weight, and the fact that the weigh moves forward as you zoom out.

    This is the lens I decided to purchase, after having tried Nikon's new 200-500.

    There is a lot to like, not least its fast focusing (which you can set to even faster if you need it, or slower, more precise if you want that instead.

    With the dock (that came free-of-charge with mine) you can do a lot of fine-tuning, although for me I have not seen the need for that. I have made both the faster and slower AF available with the custom switch on the lens barrel, but if that suits everyone, I have no idea.

    I mainly use it with my CX cameras (a.k.a. Nikon 1 cameras), my DX camera (a D3300), and occasionally with my FX camera, then usually with TCs.

    In good light, it is a delight to use with the Nikon 1 V2 (my J5 has too small a battery to work with big lenses like this one), but with the D3300 it is such a superb experience to use it, both close, and at infinity!

    I have used it with the TC-1401, the dedicated Sigma teleconverter, but far better is using a cropped sensor (the D3300 has a crop factor of 1.5, the Nikon 1 cameras have one of 2.7! So my normal equivalent focal length is either 500-600 x 2.7, that is, 1,350-1,620 mm, or when used with my D3300 500-600 x 1.5, which is 750-900 mm.

    Add a TC, or two, and we're talking focal lengths up to 3.2 meters! Contrast goes down with TCs, so I try to avoid them.

    Any serious problems?!

    Well, its size and weight make it easier to use on a stable tripod, with a sturdy Wimberley Sidekick, or similar head, but there are those that use it handheld! When used on a tripod I find, if it is dead calm, it better to use it with the OS (Optical Stabilisation) off, but if it is better to have it on if the lens wobbles a lot due to wind, or similar causes. At 3.2 meters focal length I use a timer or remote to minimise shake.

    Back to the Nikon 200-500 contra the Sigma Sport:

    Without their lens-shades, the two lenses are roughly the same size and weight, but the lens shade on the Sigma weighs almost a pound (over 300 grams), and its center of gravity moves outward a lot as you zoom out. So weight is an issue unless you have a very sturdy tripod, and ditto head.

    The Nikon 200-500 is a slower focusing lens, and originally there were quality issues as well (numerous review sites had issues with the lenses that had been sent to them, while I have heard nothing similar about the Sport.

    The Nikon 200-500 is an internally focusing, constant length, lens (same length at 200 as at 500), thus should have no problems with big weight-shifts as you zoom in and out. That's a big plus!


    A year after I posted the review above, almost to a day, I find it just as good as I did then, but I have changed its use a bit since then.

    First, I've added an Arca-Swiss compatible rail to the lens-foot, so that it balances better, and I now rarely use a tripod. Instead, I use one of the heftiest monopods I've seen on the market, a Gitzo GM5541, with a cheap FotoPro head, which I plan to upgrade to something heftier.

    And I never turn the Optical Stabilisation off, which I did when I used the lens on tripods, at times. The limiter gets frequent use, especially if the lighting and/or contrast are dull.

    The biggest step forward was upgrading to a D7500, with its far better high ISO capacity, due to its lower-noise sensor, and the fact that it is equipped with a much better AF module than my old cameras.

    That proved to be a great blessing in combination with this lens, as in certain situations you'd want a faster lens, as always.

    So that's probably what differs most between this lens, and the Nikon 200-500, the latter is a faster lens at the long end. And the Nikon lens is internally focusing so less problem with Center of Gravity shifts as you zoom in and out.

    The Sigma focuses far faster, but there are always workarounds so in real life the difference between the Sigma and the Nikon is not that big.

    But I am delighted that I can refocus from infinity to a subject a couple of yards away in less than a second, and zoom at the same time, by pulling the front of the lens towards you (no need for turn the zoom ring by hand).

    So still my most used lens, and will continue to be so for a long time into the future, i hope!

    reviewed October 9th, 2016 (purchased for $2,000)