10 out of 10 points and recommendedall !hahaha...
135 f/2L? Well is not present...reviewed June 6th, 2007 (purchased for $380)
Hey! Buy better 100mm f/2, or 135mm f/2.8 – economy in 2,5-3 times! And it is even better 100mm f/2.8 macro – and will kill two hares one shot.
You will often use f/2? When depth of sharpness – centimeter?
I photograph 100мм f/2. The open diaphragm – 0,01 % of my photos.
On f/4-f/5.6 all these lenses give similar quality, absolutely!
Then what for to pay it is more?
Canon 100mm f/2 USM – a lens of a extra-class! From f/2.8 quality – is magnificent, with 4.0 – is phenomenal!
The price - yammy-yammy!
The only thing that can prevent to receive to you qualitative shots – mistakes of an auto focus... Watch it!
With the camera 400D, with the built in flash, I click this lens from 15-20 meters on ISO400 and with f/4.0 – quality completely arranges me! Canon Speedlight 580EX – bye-bye!
Today I would buy Canon 100mm f/2.8 to have an opportunity macrophotos, but at all I do not regret about the present lens!
Pleasant weight in hands... The compact sizes... Fine appearance on a camera... The contrast, detailed pictures... The sense of reliability of a design is supported by black color of a covering...
Use fixing a mirror for reduction of effect of the greased shots! It is a telephotolens, the image already noticeably shivers!
Very much, it is very happy with this lens!
135 f/2L - a lens for photoaesthetes! But if you the photo – 100mm f/2 – a fine choice interests only!