Anakin's reviews
-
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
10 out of 10 points and recommendedAF, very fast , contrast, color, 2,8 and very sharp, construction quality,heavy (but it depends on yours arms).it's an excellent lens for reportage and a very good walk around lens. (because the AF is very fast)
reviewed October 20th, 2005 (purchased for $1,000)
very sharp @ every focal lengh and aperture, (on my 10D)
this 24-70 is expensive for an amateur , but the image quality is here -
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
10 out of 10 points and recommendedvery fast, very sharp , construction quality,heavy (but it depends on your arms)for me, it's the best Canon zoom
reviewed October 20th, 2005 (purchased for $1,400)
the construction is perfect,
AF very very fast, it's like a formula 1 !!
and the image quality is the same as equivalent prime lenses.
I use this lens for sport photos, and reportage. It's a "must have". -
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
9 out of 10 points and recommendedrange, IS , good AF , lightapertureI use this lens with my EOS 3 ,
reviewed October 21st, 2005 (purchased for $300)
it's a very good range for reportage, walk around, portraits.
IS is good for low light, but not equal with L series
it's a little noisy.
anyway, for the price, it's a good lens, very easy to use. -
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
10 out of 10 points and recommendedvery sharp, light, construction, AF very fastno IS , no collar ringAF very good, image quality excellent, very sharp @ every focal lenght and aperture.
reviewed October 21st, 2005 (purchased for $700)
good for sports photos and reportage,
if you are in a sunny country , F4 is enough. -
Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
2 out of 10 points and not recommendedpricerange, aperture, construction, image quality, AF ,very poor image quality
reviewed October 21st, 2005
vignetting
very very slow AF
construction: plastic, when you touch it, you want to throw it in the bin.