jballiett's reviews
-
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
3 out of 10 points and not recommendedconstant f/2.8 aperturepoor optical qualityVery soft at the edges. I sent it back to Canon twice for them to "tweek" the optics and it did improve from it's out of the box performance but still poor compared to Nikon's 17-35mm. Why does Canon tout their full frame sensor when they can't seem to produce a first class wide angle lens and Nikon makes some wonderful wide angle lenses but only APS size sensor. A true photographic catch 22.
reviewed November 7th, 2005 (purchased for $1,399)