What Constitutes a "Review"? By
Dave Etchells, The Imaging Resource (Wednesday, March 8, 2006 - 12:00 EST)One of the things that makes running a photo review website such a pleasant experience is the relationships I have with some of my fellow publishers.
As frequently happens, I was chatting online with Phil Askey (dpreview.com) and Jeff Keller (dcresource.com) the other day, and we found ourselves remarking on the confusion that seems to reign over what constitutes a "Preview" vs a "Review", "First Look", etc. With the three of us using different terminology for varying levels of coverage of the products we review, we were concerned that the distinction between simple reporting on basic camera functions and features based on manufacturer's specs vs deeper reporting based on our own experience and testing might not always be clear.
For all of us, it's important to us that readers understand the underpinnings of our writing, and never confuse a recitation of manufacturer-published specs with data collected through our own tests or opinions formed by direct experience with the products in question.
With that in mind, we here at IR, together with Phil at dpreview.com and Jeff at dcresource.com have agreed to use the following designations for different levels of review treatment on our respective sites:
Preview
Product photography supplied by manufacturer
May include some photos taken in-house
Covered with as much detail as is available at launch
All work carried out by our staff
Includes
Photographs and description of camera
Detailed specifications
Hands-on Preview
Based on a pre-production or production quality camera
Camera must have been used at our office
Product photography taken in our studio
Some supplementary photos may be provided by manufacturer
All work carried out by our staff
Includes
Photographs and description of camera
Detailed specifications
May include a description of function and operation
May include screen / menu captures
May include preliminary timings and performance measures
May include a user report
Review
Requires a production quality camera
Camera 'used in real life' before testing commences
Product photography taken in our studio
Some supplementary photos may be provided by manufacturer
All work carried out by our staff
Includes
Photographs and description of camera
Detailed specifications
Description of function and operation (may include screen captures)
Timings and performance measures
Image quality measures
Competitive camera comparisons
Conclusion based on test results and experience with the camera
Samples gallery containing unmodified original images from the camera