Review First Posted: 02/12/2004, Updated: 05/07/04
MSRP $999 US
Untitled Document
Digital Cameras - Olympus C-8080 Wide Zoom Test Images
I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated
index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information
on the images, including shutter speed, ISOsetting, compression setting,
etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all*that detail, we're posting
the Thumber index so only those interested inthe information need wade through
it!
Excellent resolution and fine detail, with good color, but high contrast
and slightly low saturation with the default settings. (Good contrast
and saturation controls though.)
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the C-8080 did a pretty good job, although
its default settings left the contrast somewhat high. (Happily though,
the C-8080 has excellent, fine-grained controls to adjust both contrast
and saturation to precisely match your personal preferences.)
The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, about a third of a stop less than average for
this shot. I also chose for the main selection here the shot I captured
with the 8080's contrast adjustment set to its minimum value, as the contrast
was quite high with the default settings. Color looked good with
all three white balance settings, though I chose the Auto
white balance as the most accurate overall. The Manual
setting produced nearly identical results, but the Daylight
setting was a hint reddish.
Compared to many consumer-grade cameras, the image here looks just a
little undersaturated, but is actually a more accurate representation
of the original scene than it would be with more saturation added. Color
is quite accurate, and the blue flowers in the bouquet have almost exactly
the right hue. (Many digicams have trouble with this blue, which is actually
a light navy blue with just a tinge of purple in it, in real life.) The
color of the bright red flowers is also kept in check, and the greens
and yellows look quite good as well.
Resolution is excellent, with a lot of fine detail visible throughout
the frame (even in the shadows) and low image noise. In particular, there's
relatively little loss of detail in the subtly contrasting areas of Marti's
hair from the noise-suppression processing, a good sign. Overall, an excellent
performance.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV, see files 8080OUTMP0.HTM
through 8080OUTMP3.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Contrast Series: As noted above, the C-8080 Wide Zoom has a contrast adjustment option
with very fine-grained steps. For the main image in this test, I used
the lowest setting, but include links to the lowest, default, and highest
settings below. What's particularly nice about the C-8080's contrast adjustment
is that it has a total of 7 steps with which to cover its range, so you
can easily make small "tweaks" to match your personal preferences
very closely.
Saturation Series: As with its contrast adjustment, the C-8080 Wide Zoom has a color
saturation adjustment with very fine-grained steps as well. As above,
the shots below show examples with the saturation control set to its lowest,
default, and highest settings. This is a very useful range of control,
with steps small enough to permit minor tweaks to match personal preferences,
something I'd like to see on more cameras. (To view the entire saturation
series, see files 8080OUTSAT1.HTM through 8080OUTSAT7.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.)
Excellent resolution and detail, but again high
contrast with the default setting.
Overall results here are similar to the wider shot
above, in terms of exposure. Contrast is again high, and saturation a
little lower than average, but as noted above, probably at a level that
most pros would prefer. (I left the contrast adjustment at its default
value for this shot.) Although the highlights are quite bright, the midtones
are fairly dark. The image at right was captured with no exposure compensation
adjustment, a bit lower than average for this shot. I was a little torn
whether to show the image with +0.3 EV adjustment, as that produced much
better midtones, but I felt left the highlights too washed out. The C-8080's
5x zoom lens does a great job preventing any strong distortion on Marti's
features. Resolution and detail are again excellent, with great definition
in Marti's face, hair, and in the flowers.
To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 to +0.7 EV, see files 8080FACAM1.HTM
through 8080FACAP2.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
A bright, powerful flash, producing good color and good coverage.
Slow-Sync mode results in an orange cast though.
The C-8080's built-in flash is quite powerful, producing good coverage
and overall color. As the default exposure
setting was slightly dim, I boosted the exposure to +1.0
EV, which resulted in a very bright exposure, but still left detail
in the highlights and good color in the flowers. I also shot with the
camera's Slow-Sync flash mode, which surprisingly required a +1.7
EV exposure compensation adjustment. (Slow sync mode usually requires
less exposure compensation, not more.) Here's a shot at the default
exposure.)The
longer exposure time allows more ambient light into the image and results
in a strong orange cast from the household incandescent lighting. (It
looks like the Slow-Sync exposure option tends to bias the exposure toward
the ambient lighting more than is sometimes the case.)
Really excellent results with the Automatic white balance, good exposure
as well.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs
used for the lighting. Surprisingly, the C-8080's Auto
white balance setting produced the best-looking color here, doing a near-perfect
job of dealing with the warm-toned incandescent lighting. (It's really
unusual for a camera's auto white balance setting to do this well
on this test.) The Manual setting was just
a little too cool, and the Incandescent setting
was reddish. Overall color looks really good with the Auto white balance,
though the blue flowers are a bit dark and purplish. (Still, considering
the light source, results are very good.) The shot at right was taken
with a +1.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment, which is about average
for this shot.
ISO Series:
Considering its 8-megapixel sensor, the C-8080 Wide Zoom generally does
pretty well in the noise department. Here, while there's minor blotchiness
visible in the blue channel, even at ISO 50, the image noise isn't particularly
visible until you hit ISO 200. At ISO 400 though, the noise becomes what
I would consider objectionable.
Very nice color, with great detail and resolution.
The C-8080's Manual white balance setting
produced the best overall color here, though the Auto
and Daylight settings weren't too far off
the mark. Resolution is very high, with excellent detail in the tree limbs
and front shrubbery. Definition is very good as well. (The C-8080's eight-megapixel
CCD definitely stretches the limits of this poster as a test target. Even
though the poster was made from a 500MB scan of a 4x5 negative shot with
a tack-sharp lens, the C-8080 is close to extracting all the detail that's
to be found here.) Details are fairly sharp overall, though corner softness
is present in all four corners.
Excellent resolution and detail, reasonably good dynamic range.
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field
lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to
the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio.
The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different than in this
shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on
the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general
though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail,
and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most
likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks,
or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this. This
is an image where the wisdom of Olympus' investment in the 8080's huge
lens really shows its worth. The image is quite sharp from corner to corner,
with little or none of the softness I've become so accustomed to seeing
in the corners of digicam images. There's also virtually no chromatic
aberration to be found here either. The tiny foliage details in the front
shrubbery are well-defined, as are the finer details of the tree limbs
above the roof, and the house front trim. The camera picks up some detail
in the bright white paint surrounding the bay window, but not a lot. (This
is a trouble spot for many digicams.) Detail is good in the shadow area
above the front door, though, with fairly low noise. Overall color is
quite good, very faithful to the original scene, but the camera's default
contrast is rather high, as I'd noted earlier. The table below shows a
standard resolution and quality series, followed by ISO, sharpness, saturation,
contrast, and hue series.
Resolution Series: (Gee, only 8 image-size options? - I'm not complaining, but does anyone
really need this many size options on their digicam?)
Sharpness Series: The C-8080 Wide Zoom's options for in-camera sharpening span a wide
but very useful range of effects, from what looks like no sharpening at
all (ideal for images you want to manipulate in an imaging program, and
then sharpen after the fact), to a fairly strong sharpening that nonetheless
stops short of the absurd levels some cameras permit. I was surprised
by what a good job the camera does with its default setting -It brings
out excellent detail, with minimal halos around objects, and minimal impact
on image noise as well. Very well done.
As I commented on earlier, the C-8080 Wide zoom has nice, very fine-grained
adjustments for saturation, contrast, and hue. In the tables below, I
show the effect of images shot with each setting at its extreme values,
as well as at default and one step above and below default. This should
give a good idea of both the range of each control, as well as the relatively
small size of the individual steps. (You can see the missing +/-2 steps
for these series on the thumbnail index page,
if you're interested.)
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto (5x,
in this case), and at full telephoto with the digital zoom enabled. The
C-8080's lens is equivalent to a 28-140mm zoom on a 35mm camera. That
corresponds to a pretty wide angle to a pretty good telephoto, a very
useful range. Following are the results at each zoom setting.
Nearly accurate color with the Manual white balance setting, excellent
detail.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. The C-8080's Manual
white balance option produced the best overall color here, despite a slight
cool cast. (Both the Auto and Daylight
settings were tricked into producing warmer color balances.) Skin tones
are pale, but still pretty good. The blue robe is nearly accurate, with
only faint purple tints in the deep shadows. Resolution is excellent,
as the embroidery of the blue robe and on the red vest show a lot of fine
detail. (The original data file for this poster was only 20MB though,
so cameras like the C-8080 are definitely capable of showing more detail
than the poster has in it.)
A very tiny macro area with outstanding detail. Flash is blocked
by the lens, however.
The C-8080 performed very well in the macro category, capturing a minimum
area of only 2.57 x 1.92 inches (65 x 49 millimeters) in normal macro
mode. The "Super" macro setting captured an even smaller area,
at 1.47 x 1.11 inches (37 x 28 millimeters). Resolution is excellent,
with strong detail in the dollar bill, coins, and brooch. (In Super macro
mode, however, details are blurred in the coins and brooch due to the
shallow depth of field that resulted from the short shooting distance,
not the fault of the C-8080.) The C-8080's flash
is blocked by the lens, so you'll need an alternative source of lighting
(such as a macro ringlight). While there's some softness in the corners
of the super macro mode shot, what's really surprising is how crisp the
standard macro shot is from corner to corner. Here again, the 8080's lens
proves its worth.
The C-8080's Auto and Manual
white balance settings produced virtually identical color balances here,
though the Daylight setting resulted in a
warm color cast. I chose the Auto setting for the main shot, though it
was really a toss-up between it and the Manual shot. The 8080 wanted to
underexpose this shot slightly, so I boosted exposure by 0.3 EV, to put
the white block of the MacBeth(tm) target right about where I aim for,
namely between 240 and 250 brightness units in the final file. (Here,
it ended up at 250, on the high end of the range I try for.) Color here
is very accurate and appropriately saturated, with very pure colors across
the board. While the contrast is on the high side, shadow detail is really
excellent, with very low noise as well. (The C-8080 clearly separates
the bottom two swatches of the large grey scale, something that few cameras
can manage this well.)
Excellent performance, with good color and exposure, even at the darkest
light levels.
The C-8080 produced clear, bright, usable images down to the 1/16 foot-candle
(0.67 lux) limit of my test, with pretty good color at all four ISO settings.
The color was slightly warm-hued in the dimmer shots, but overall performance
was very good. The C-8080 has an optional Noise Reduction system that
did a good job of keeping noise in check, although even with the noise
reduction system turned off, the 8080's images are surprisingly clean.
(Some reviewers have found little difference with the 8080 noise reduction
on or off, but I found a very clear difference, at least with our test
sample.) The table below shows the best exposure I was able to obtain
for each of a range of illumination levels. Images in this table (like
all sample photos) are untouched, exactly as they came from the camera.
(Note: If you'd like to use a light meter
to check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting,
a light level of 1 foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of 2 seconds
at F/2.8 and ISO 100.)
1 fc
11 lux
1/2 fc
5.5 lux
1/4 fc
2.7 lux
1/8 fc
1.3 lux
1/16 fc
0.67 lux
1/16fc
No NR
ISO
50
3.2 sec
f2.4
8 sec
f2.4
15 sec
f2.4
30.41 sec
f2.4
64.51 sec
f2.4
64.57 sec
f2.4
ISO
100
1.6 sec
f2.4
4 sec
f2.4
8 sec
f2.4
16.41 sec
f2.4
32.58 sec
f2.4
32.31 sec
f2.4
ISO
200
1/1 sec
f2.4
2 sec
f2.4
4 sec
f2.4
8 sec
f2.4
16.76 sec
f2.4
16.58 sec
f2.4
ISO
400
1/2 sec
f2.4
1 sec
f2.4
2 sec
f2.4
4 sec
f2.4
8 sec
f2.4
8 sec
f2.4
Flash Range Test
A very powerful flash, with virtually no falloff at the furthest shooting
distance, at ISO 100.
In my testing, the C-8080's flash illuminated the test target all the
way out to 14 feet, without any significant decrease in intensity. Below
is the flash range series, with distances from eight to 14 feet from the
target.
Very high resolution, 1,600-1,650 lines of "strong detail."
Average barrel distortion, low pincushion though.
The C-8080 performed very well on the "laboratory" resolution
test chart, as expected with its eight-megapixel CCD and good lens. It
started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions as low as
1,000-1,100 lines per picture height, in both horizontal and vertical
directions. I found "strong detail" out to at least 1,600 lines
vertically (although there are enough artifacts at that point that I question
whether I should perhaps drop back to 1,500 lines, per my own, fairly
conservative criteria - see below), 1,650 lines horizontally. "Extinction"
of the target patterns didn't occur until right around 2,000 lines, but
even then, some detail is faintly discernable.
A note on "resolution:" Some reviewers would doubtless report
the resolution as higher here, but I tend to be conservative in these
numbers, feeling that you shouldn't rate a camera as resolving a level
of detail if the artifacts and aliasing are as strong as the primary subject
detail. Hence my somewhat lower figures.) It's also worth noting that
I've found the resolution of the three 8-megapixel digicams I've tested
thus far (the 8080, the Sony DSC-F828, and the Nikon Coolpix 8700, as
of this writing) to be the same, in terms of the number of lines they
can resolve on the test charts. There are differences between their res-chart
images though, in terms of how crisp the images appear. This has as much
to do with the cameras' image processing though, as it does with their
actual optical resolution, so I don't try to slant my figures here to
acknowledge that. (For what it's worth though, I found the Sony F828 to
be the most crisp looking, the C-8080 next, and the 8700 the softest of
the lot, although not by a great amount.)
Optical distortion on the C-8080 is about average at the wide-angle end,
where I measured approximately 0.8 percent barrel distortion. The telephoto
end fared somewhat better, as I measured 0.2 percent pincushion distortion
there. This range of geometric distortion seems to be about average among
the high-end 8-megpixel cameras currently on the market, but I'd really
like to see less geometric distortion in digicam lenses overall. Chromatic
aberration is interesting in this lens, in that its effects extend quite
a distance from the scene object triggering them, but the level of coloration
is fairly low, so the net effect isn't as bothersome as it might otherwise
be. (This distortion is visible as a very slight colored fringe around
the objects at the edges of the field of view on the resolution target.)
Excellent accuracy from the electronic viewfinder.
The C-8080's electronic "optical" viewfinder (EVF) is very
accurate, showing 97 percent frame accuracy at wide angle, and about
99 percent at telephoto. The LCD monitor is also very accurate, since
it shows the same view, just on a larger screen. Given that I like LCD
monitors to be as close to 100 percent accuracy as possible, the C-8080's
LCD monitor is essentially perfect in this regard. Flash distribution
is fairly even at wide angle, with just a little falloff at the corners
and edges of the frame. At telephoto, flash distribution is more uniform,
without any noticeable falloff at all.