I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated
index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information
on the images, including shutter speed, ISOsetting, compression setting,
etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all*that detail, we're posting
the Thumber index so only those interested inthe information need wade through
it!
"Sunlit" Portrait: (This is my new "Outdoor" Portrait test - read more about it
here.)
Excellent resolution
with a lot of visible fine detail throughout the frame. Good color, though
contrast is slightly high.
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the G6 handled the challenge pretty well,
though contrast is somewhat high, even with its contrast adjustment set
to the "low" position.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, which held onto the highlight detail, but at
the cost of somewhat dark midtones and skin tones. I chose the
Auto white balance as the most accurate overall,
though results were similar to the Daylight
setting. The Manual setting was a bit warm,
however.
Overall color looks good, with very good skin tones. The blue flowers
in the bouquet are a little darker and more purplish than in real life,
but overall pretty close to the correct color. The red flowers are a bit
oversaturated, but aren't too far out of range, and saturation looks pretty
good in the strong greens and yellows. Color looks good throughout the
rest of the frame as well, though the red flowers are just a tad oversaturated.
Resolution is outstanding, as the G6's 7.1-megapixel CCD captures excellent
detail throughout the frame, even in Marti's facial features. Detail is
very good in the shadow areas as well, despite the high contrast, and
image noise in the shadows is lower than I'm accustomed to seeing.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files G6OUTAP0.HTM
through G6OUTAP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Contrast Series:
The G6's contrast adjustment works very well. The low contrast option
seems to affect the highlights more than the shadows, while the contrast
boost appears to affect highlight and shadow areas more or less equally.
There's also relatively little simultaneous effect on color saturation,
a good characteristic. I'd like to see a bit wider range of adjustment,
particularly in the low-contrast direction, as well as more/finer steps,
but the control as it exists is more effective than that on most digicams
I test.
Saturation Series: Likewise, the saturation adjustment on the G6 does very well also,
although I'd perhaps like to see five steps covering the same range, and
a little less impact on image contrast.
Outstanding resolution and detail, though again
somewhat high contrast.
Color balance and exposure appear similar to the
wider shot above, but again with slightly high contrast from the high-key
lighting. Midtones are a hint dark, but still have a lot of strong detail.
The shot at right was taken with no exposure compensation adjustment,
which produces rather dark midtones, but I felt that the +0.3 EV setting
resulted in too-strong highlights on Marti's face. The G6's 4x zoom lens
helps prevent geometric distortion of Marti's features, and captures sharp
details. Resolution is again excellent, with absolutely outstanding definition
in the details of Marti's face and hair, as well as in the fabric texture
of the green leaves.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files G6FACAP0.HTM
through G6FACAP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Good intensity and coverage with both flash modes, with pretty good
color, despite a slight orange cast.
The G6's built-in flash illuminated the subject pretty evenly at the
default exposure setting, although it underexposed
it a fair bit. I actually chose an exposure compensation adjustment of
+1.0 EV for the main exposure, which is slightly
high. Though coverage was fairly even at the lower exposures, the higher
exposure produced a much brighter shot. Color balance is orange from the
strong incandescent room lighting, though the orange cast isn't too strong.
(Still, a good bit more than I like to see in this shot.) I also shot
with the Slow Sync flash mode, choosing an exposure compensation adjustment
of +0.7 EV for the main shot here. Results
were similar to the normal flash mode, with about the same amount of orange
cast from the background lighting.
To view the entire exposure
series from zero to +1.3 EV in the normal flash mode, see files G6INFP0.HTM
through G6INFP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
To view the same exposure
series in the Slow Sync flash mode, see files G6INFSP0.HTM through G6INFSP4.HTM
on the thumbnail index page.
Trouble with automatic white balance, but good results with both Incandescent
and Manual settings, good exposure as well.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs
used for the lighting. The G6's Incandescent
white balance setting did the best job here, though results are just slightly
cool and magenta overall. Still, overall color looked best, as the Manual
setting resulted more a yellow cast than I like, and the Auto
setting had a strong warm cast. (Like many other digicams, Canon's cameras
seem to have quite a bit of difficulty with household incandescent lighting
in Auto white balance mode.) The main shot was taken with a +1.0 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, about average for this shot. The blue flowers
in the bouquet are slightly dark and purplish, but actually look pretty
good considering the difficult light source. There's a modest amount of
image noise in these ISO 100 shots (the standard ISO that I shoot this
subject at), but it doesn't detract from the subject detail too much,
and isn't very visible unless you look specifically at the image's blue
channel.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files G6INTP0.HTM
through G6INTP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
ISO Series:
Image noise is barely visible here at ISO 50, but it's at a pretty low
level, and increases relatively gradually as the ISO is increased. At
ISO 200, it would probably be visible to most observers, but is still
pretty unobtrusive. Even at ISO 400, it isn't all that bad, thanks in
part to a relatively fine-grained pattern that makes it less obvious to
the eye. A very nice job.
The G6's Auto and Daylight
white balance settings both produced similar results, with just slight
warm casts. The Manual produced a more accurate
white value in the house trim. Overall color is just slightly cool with
the Manual setting, and the green grass has a blue tint, but I chose it
for the main image, as I felt that it was the most natural looking. Resolution
is very high, as the G6's 7.1-megapixel CCD can actually capture more
detail than this poster has in it (even though the image was made from
a 500-megabyte scan of a 4x5 negative shot with a tack-sharp lens). Details
are also sharp throughout the frame, from corner to corner. A very good
job.
Excellent resolution and detail, lost detail in the highlights, but
very good shadow detail.
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field
lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to
the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio.
The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different than in this
shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on
the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general
though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail,
and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most
likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks,
or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the
G6 does an outstanding job with it. The level of fine detail visible in
the tree limbs over the roof and fine foliage in front of the house is
exceptional, with crisp definition, even in the smallest leaf patterns.
In-camera sharpening does a good job here, with good sharpness and relatively
few artifacts of the sharpening process. The G6's lens does very well
also, with good sharpness from corner to corner (just a little softness
is visible in the two top corners).
The camera lost most of the detail in the bright
white paint surrounding the bay window, but held very good detail in the
shadow area above the front door, with low noise. Overall color and exposure
both look very good. The table below shows a standard resolution and quality
series, followed by ISO, sharpness, contrast, saturation, and color series.
ISO Series: As before, the G6's images have low noise levels. Noise increases
at high ISOs, but with a fine-grained pattern that helps make it less
obtrusive than the noise in many digicams.
Sharpness Series:
As noted above, the G6's default image sharpening strikes a good balance,
delivering good sharpness with relatively few defects. For the ultimate
in image detail and resolution though, use the low sharpening option and
sharpen on the computer with Photoshop(tm) or other imaging software.
- Image shot with the in-camera sharpening set to "low" take
unsharp masking unusually well. (Try 250% at 0.3 pixel radius to see some
amazing detail.)
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto (4x,
in this case), and at full telephoto with the digital zoom enabled. The
G6's lens is equivalent to a 35-140mm zoom on a 35mm camera. That corresponds
to an average wide angle to a fairly substantial telephoto. Following
are the results at each zoom setting.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. Both the G6's Auto and
Daylight settings both produced similar results, with only slightly
warm, color. The Manual setting also produced
nearly accurate color, but with a cooler cast. I chose the Auto setting
for the main image, as the skin tones looked best to my eye. The blue
robe looks just about right, with only faint purplish tints in the deep
shadows. Detail is very strong and resolution very high, with great clarity
in the embroidery of the blue robe, as well as in the flower garland,
beaded necklaces, and instrument strings. (The original data file for
this poster was only 20MB though, so cameras like the G6 are definitely
capable of showing more detail than the poster has in it.)
A small macro area with good detail in the dollar bill, but the corners
are very soft. Flash almost throttles down enough, but overexposes slightly.
The G6 performed very well in the macro category, capturing a minimum
area of only 2.11 x 1.58 inches (54 x 40 millimeters). Resolution is very
high, showing a lot of fine detail in the dollar bill. The G6 loses some
points in the macro category though, for the very soft corners in the
image. Most digicams tend to have soft corners when shooting in macro
mode, but the G6 is worse in this respect than most. The G6's flash
almost throttles down for the macro area, but still overexposes a little
in its default exposure mode. Happily though, its built-in 3-stop neutral
density filter more than makes up the necessary difference.
The G6's Manual white balance setting produced
the best results here. The Auto white balance
setting also produced good results, though slightly yellow. The Daylight
setting resulted in a stronger warm cast. Exposure is about right, and
the G6 distinguishes the subtle tonal variations of the Q60 target without
any trouble. The large color blocks are accurate with good saturation
(only slight oversaturation in the red and blue primary color blocks).
Detail is strong in the shadow area of the charcoal briquettes, and the
last steps of the vertical gray scales are just visible. Image noise is
low. Good results overall.
Now, for the REAL technoids, Imatest!
I've recently begun using Norman Koren's excellent "Imatest"
analysis program for quantitative, thoroughly objective analysis of digicam
test images. For those interested, I've prepared a page summarizing
what Imatest showed me about the PowerShot G6's images.
The results in the tests below mirror those seen above in other test shots.
The test series are repeated here without further comment, for the benefit
of our more quantitatively-oriented readers.
Very good low-light performance, with bright images and good color
to the limits of my test. Good focusing with the AF illuminator as well.
The G6 produced clear, bright, usable images with good color down to
the 1/16 foot-candle (0.67 lux) limit of my test at all four ISO settings.
(Average city street lighting at night corresponds to a light level of
about 1 foot-candle.) Some of the shots at the lowest light levels show
a slight pink cast, but overall color is still quite good. Noise was low,
at the 50 and 100 ISO settings, creeping upward at ISO 200, and becoming
high at ISO 400. Even at ISO 400 though, while the amplitude of the noise
is fairly high, its pattern is so fine-grained that it really isn't all
that objectionable. (IMHO, anyway - I'd have no qualms about shooting
at ISO 400 with the G6.) Thanks to its bright autofocus-assist illuminator,
the G6 can also focus in almost total darkness as well. The table below
shows the best exposure I was able to obtain for each of a range of illumination
levels. Images in this table (like all sample photos) are untouched, exactly
as they came from the camera.
(Note: If you'd like to use a light meter to
check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a
light level of one foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two
seconds at f/2.8 and ISO 100.)
1 fc
11 lux
1/2 fc
5.5 lux
1/4 fc
2.7 lux
1/8 fc
1.3 lux
1/16 fc
0.67 lux
ISO
50
1.6 sec
f2.0
3.2 sec
f2.0
6 sec
f2.0
15 sec
f2.0
15 sec
f2.0
ISO
100
1/1 sec
f2.0
1.6 sec
f2.0
3.2 sec
f2.0
8 sec
f2.0
15 sec
f2.0
ISO
200
1/2 sec
f2.0
1/1 sec
f2.0
1.6 sec
f2.0
4 sec
f2.0
8 sec
f2.0
ISO
400
1/5 sec
f2.0
1/2 sec
f2.0
1/1 sec
f2.0
2 sec
f2.0
4 sec
f2.0
Flash Range Test
A powerful flash, with consistent results to the 14 foot limit of
this test.
In my testing, the G6's flash illuminated the test target all the way
out to 14 feet, without any significant decrease in intensity. Below is
the flash range series, with distances from eight to 14 feet from the
target.
Very high resolution, 1,550 lines of "strong detail." Average
barrel distortion, and low pincushion.
The G6 performed very well on the "laboratory" resolution test
chart. It didn't start showing artifacts in the test patterns until resolutions
around 1,200 lines per picture height vertically, but around 1,000 lines
horizontally. I found "strong detail" out to at least 1,550
lines horizontally, but only to about 1,500 lines vertically. (And there
were strong aliasing artifacts a good 100-150 lines lower than these levels.)
"Extinction" of the target patterns didn't occur until about
1,900 lines.
Using its "MTF 50" criteria, Imatest reported uncorrected resolution
figures of 1552 line widths per picture height in the horizontal direction
(corresponding to the vertically-oriented edge), and 1334 along the vertical
axis (corresponding to the horizontally-oriented edge), for a combined
average of 1443 LW/PH. Correcting to a "standardized" sharpening
with a one-pixel radius increased the vertical number quite a bit, to
1493 LW/PH, giving a corrected average of 1523 LW/PH, an excellent result.
Optical distortion on the G6 is about average at the wide-angle end,
where I measured approximately 0.7 percent barrel distortion. The telephoto
end fared much better, as I measured approximately 0.3 percent pincushion
distortion there. (Both numbers are within the average range, among digicams
I test.) Chromatic aberration was very low, showing no more than two or
three pixels of moderate coloration on either side of the target lines.
(This distortion is visible as a very slight colored fringe around the
objects at the edges of the field of view on the resolution target.) The
G6's lens was also very sharp from corner to corner, further evidence
of high quality optics.
A very tight optical viewfinder, but accurate LCD monitor.
The G6's optical viewfinder is very tight at telephoto, showing approximately
76 of the final image area. Results were a little better at wide angle,
showing about 83 percent frame accuracy. The LCD monitor proved more
accurate, showing about 99 percent at both zoom settings (though my
top measurement lines were cut off at the wide angle setting, possibly
from the barrel distortion). Given that I like LCD monitors to be as
close to 100 percent accuracy as possible, the G6's LCD monitor is essentially
perfect in this regard, but I'd really like to see a more accurate
optical viewfinder on the camera. Flash distribution was a little uneven
at wide angle, with falloff at the corners and edges of the frame. At
telephoto, flash distribution was more uniform, though some slight falloff
is visible in the corners.