This first set is a series showing the effect of the contrast adjustment on the DaveBox target. A good range, and reasonably fine steps.
D7DBCON1.JPG
4,064,594 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBCON2.JPG
4,083,508 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBCON3.JPG
4,101,291 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBCON4.JPG
4,018,901 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBCON5.JPG
3,925,007 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
Here's an ISO series. I haven't scrutinized these too closely yet, but at first glance, the noise levels look pretty good. At high ISOs though, the camera does seem to trade off a fair bit of fine/subtle subject detail to achieve the low noise levels.
D7DBI0100.JPG
2,065,002 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBI0200.JPG
1,876,079 bytes
3008x2000
1/25 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 200
|
D7DBI0400.JPG
2,123,840 bytes
3008x2000
1/50 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 400
|
D7DBI0800.JPG
2,393,613 bytes
3008x2000
1/100 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 800
|
D7DBI1600.JPG
2,527,746 bytes
3008x2000
1/200 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 1600
|
A series showing the effect of the saturation adjustment. A good range with fine steps, although I think I'd like to see it extend further into the low-saturation realm.
D7DBSAT1.JPG
3,996,663 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBSAT2.JPG
4,047,898 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBSAT3.JPG
4,110,866 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBSAT4.JPG
4,220,033 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBSAT5.JPG
4,255,677 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
The shots above were all captured with the 7D's manual (custom) white balance adjustment. Both the auto (here) and the Daylight white balance options produced rather yellowish casts.
D7DBWBA.JPG
2,063,876 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7DBWBD.JPG
2,074,255 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+0.3 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
Here's a contrast series of the long-suffering Marti under the deliberately-awful lighting of my "sunlight simulator." Just lowest, normal, and highest. I'd really like to see the contrast adjustment's range extend further in the low-contrast direction.
D7OUTCON1.JPG
4,582,761 bytes
2000x3008
1/60 sec
f9.0
+1.0 EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7OUTCON3.JPG
4,660,986 bytes
2000x3008
1/60 sec
f9.0
+1.0 EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
After I'd shot these and released Marti to her pre-Thanksgiving preparations I had one of those "doh" moments. - The 7D has a special "high key" mode for shooting exactly this sort of subject, and in the scramble that the day was, I totally didn't think of testing it. Drat. Stay tuned after the holiday, I'll try to get something up with it ahead of the rest of the review.
D7OUTCON5.JPG
4,680,907 bytes
2000x3008
1/60 sec
f9.0
+1.0 EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
Another shot, this time with the Manual white balance option. The shots above and to the right were captured with +1.0 EV of exposure compensation. This gave good-looking skin tones, but blew out the highlights. This shot shows what happened with +0.7 EV of adjustment (with the lowest contrast setting). - A rather dark-looking picture. I'll definitely be interested in seeing what the special High Key option does with this lighting!
D7OUTMP2.JPG
4,576,861 bytes
2000x3008
1/50 sec
f11.0
+0.7 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
Just two shots here, showing the extremes of the saturation adjustment. (Saturation was at its neutral setting in the other shots here.)
D7OUTSAT1.JPG
4,540,204 bytes
2000x3008
1/60 sec
f9.0
+1.0 EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
D7OUTSAT5.JPG
4,828,895 bytes
2000x3008
1/60 sec
f9.0
+1.0 EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
The standard ISO-12233 res target. I felt I had to include this because everyone would ask for it, but I winced inwardly (maybe outwardly too) at the idea of shooting it with a 17-35mm zoom that my subjective sense told me was rather soft. Stopped down to f/16, it definitely looked better than at wider apertures, so that's what we have here. I'll try to replace this image with one shot with a sharp prime early next week after we get the 50mm f/1.4 optic from Konica Minolta.
Lens aside, the camera's image processing does a good job here. Very clean, very few artifacts, and a nice job from the default in-camera sharpening. (To my eye, neither too much nor too little.)
D7RES3008F_F16.JPG
2,119,367 bytes
3008x2000
1/15 sec
f16.0
+1.7 EV
30mm focal length
ISO 100
|
This viewfinder accuracy shot is very interesting: Konica Minolta's marketing materials make reference to the 7D's 95% viewfinder accuracy. As you can see here though, the VF on our production sample gave almost exactly 100% coverage.
D7VFAT.JPG
3,414,010 bytes
3008x2000
1/60 sec
f5.6
Unreported EV
35mm focal length
ISO 100
|
|
|
|