clark666's reviews
-
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
9 out of 10 points and recommendedlight weight, inexpensive, sharp imagesnot used very ofterI use it in low-light situations and it works well but the images at high ISO can't really be said to be perfect, just good compared to other photos taken at high ISO
reviewed November 28th, 2006 -
Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM
7 out of 10 points and recommendedlight weight, inexpensive, sharp imagesnot very sharp at 300mm Does not work with ef 2x converterI bought it because of the 100 to 200 image quality. It does photograph at 300mm but it isn't nearly as sharp at that length. I doesn't work with the Canon 2x converter because they won't physically fit together.
reviewed November 28th, 2006 -
Canon EF 28-90mm f/4-5.6 II USM
8 out of 10 points and recommendedsmall, came with cameraquite slow. I usually don't use it at ISOs lower than 400 without a tripodIt is a good standard lens for a film camera but doesn't have wide angle capability with an APS sized sensor. I use it as a carry around lens when hiking but I really need to carry a wide angle lens for landscapes. Sometimes I just carry the Elan 7 that it came with; it works well with a good quality film.
reviewed November 28th, 2006 -
Olympus 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital
10 out of 10 points and recommendedcomes with camera. Sharp images, light weight no need to replace itThe 14-54 is faster and sharper, but weighes moreIt came with the camera and has no shortcomings. A faster lens is better. A wider angle is good, but the 14-45 is fine on its own.
reviewed November 28th, 2006 -
Olympus 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 Zuiko Digital
10 out of 10 points and recommendedcomes with camera. Sharp images, light weight no need to replace itThere is nothing wrong with this lensThis is an excellent lens. It is 3.5-4.5 but has no problems. You do need to stand at least 10 feet away from your subject to get a decent image; it doesn't focus at closer distances
reviewed November 28th, 2006