I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information on the images, including shutter speed, ISO setting, compression setting, etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all* that detail, we're posting the Thumber index so only those interested in the information need wade through it!
Great resolution, detail, and color, and
the contrast adjustment option helps hold detail in the highlights and
shadows.
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the PowerShot G3 performed well overall,
though with slightly high contrast using its default settings. - Its
contrast-adjustment feature helped a fair bit though, producing very
good results in its "low" setting.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.3 EV exposure compensation adjustment,
with the camera's contrast adjustment set to Low. (As noted, the default
contrast setting resulted in lost detail in both the highlights and
shadows,, a typical problem on this shot for many cameras.) Midtones
are brighter in this shot, and although the highlights are still a bit
hot, detail is better there as well. I chose the Daylight
white balance as the most accurate overall, though the Auto
setting produced similar results. The Manual
setting resulted in a very warm color balance.
Skin tones look pretty good to my eye, although the blue flowers in
the bouquet are a little dark and purplish. (This is a very difficult
blue for many digicams to get right. For reference, the flowers are
a light navy blue.) The G3 oversaturates the red flowers just a little,
but handles the bright greens and yellows well. Resolution looks great,
with a lot of fine detail visible throughout the frame, even in the
shadows. Details are also sharp, and image noise in the shadows is quite
low. A very nice job all around.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files
G3OUTLCDP0.HTM through G3OUTLCDP4.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.
Overall results are similar to the wider shot above,
and the G3's 4x zoom lens helps prevent distortion of Marti's features.
Detail is excellent, with sharp details in Marti's face and hair. The
shot at right was taken at the default exposure setting, which produced
a nicely balanced exposure with only the strongest highlights blown
out. I again shot with the low contrast setting, which increased detail
in the highlights and midtones. Shadow detail is strong, with very low
noise.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files
G3FACLCDP0.HTM through G3FACLCDP4.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.
Good intensity and overall color, but the incandescent room lighting
produces a strong orange cast.
The G3's built-in flash illuminates the subject well, producing a bright
image with reasonably good color. The background incandescent lighting
results in an orange cast on the back wall, which spills onto Marti's
features a fair amount. Still, color on Marti's shirt and in the flower
bouquet isn't too bad. The shot at right has a +0.3 EV exposure compensation
adjustment, which brightens the image just enough. Increasing the exposure
beyond this point washed out highlights in the white shirt, and didn't
really affect the orange cast very much.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV, see files
G3INFP0.HTM through G3INFP3.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.
Excellent color with the Incandescent white balance option, but
very good results with Manual as well.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent
bulbs used for the lighting. The G3's Incandescent
white balance produced the best color here, though the Manual
option produced nearly accurate color as well (with just a slight greenish
cast). The Auto setting really had trouble
though, producing a strong warm cast. Marti's skin tone is pretty good
here, although the blue flowers came out quite dark and purplish. (Probably
to be expected, considering the light source.) The shots at right have
a +1.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment, which is about average for
this shot, and about as high as I'd like to go here.
ISO Series:
Image noise is low in the G3's test shots, especially at ISO 50. Noise
increases at the 400 setting, but is fairly fine-grained.
All three of the G3's white balance settings produced good results
here, but I finally settled on the Manual setting
as the most accurate overall. The Auto setting
was nearly identical, though a hint warmer, and Daylight
was just a touch cool. Resolution is high, and the tree limbs and shrubbery
show a lot of fine detail. Details are just a touch soft, slightly more
so along the left side of the frame. Additionally, the finer foliage
details in front of the house are defined more by contrast than finely-resolved
detail, but definition is still good overall. All in all, an excellent
performance.
Excellent resolution and detail, but slightly limited dynamic range.
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field lens performance.
NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to the other "house"
shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio. The rendering of detail
in the poster will be very different than in this shot, and color values
(and even the presence or absence of leaves on the trees!) will vary
in this subject as the seasons progress. In general though, you can
evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail, and in the
tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most likely
to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks, or in
the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot," given the infinite
range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the G3 did an excellent
job with it. The tree limbs over the roof and fine foliage in front
of the house show strong detail, especially in the leaf patterns and
branches. Details are crisp throughout the frame, although the left
edge of the frame is a little soft. The camera picks up only a little
detail in the bright white paint surrounding the bay window, a trouble
spot for many digicams and evidence of a slightly limited dynamic range.
(The main shot here was not taken with the low contrast setting selected,
which would likely have helped somewhat.) Detail is stronger in the
shadow area above the front door, however. Overall color looks good,
but exposure is bright and contrast is high. The table below shows a
standard resolution and quality series, followed by ISO, sharpness,
contrast, saturation, and effects series.
"Effects" Series:
The G3 offers several interesting "Effects" options as well.
Though I personally don't see a lot of value in the black & white
or sepia options, preferring to do such manipulations in an imaging
program, they do add some creative options. (If you're really interested
in black & white digital photography, you can get much better results
than the camera's own internal black/white conversion through any of
several third-party applications and plug-ins, that mimic the behavior
of popular black and white film emulsions.) The Neutral and Vivid color
options produce similar results to the saturation adjustment, and produce
good overall adjustments. The Low Sharpness setting, separate from the
camera's main sharpness adjustment, is just a hair sharper than the
Soft setting above (but softer than the Normal setting).
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto
(4x, in this case), and at full telephoto
with the digital zoom enabled. The G3's lens is equivalent to a 34-140mm
zoom on a 35mm camera. That corresponds to a fairly wide angle to a
moderate telephoto. Following are the results at each zoom setting.
Good overall color, albeit slightly cool-toned, and great detail.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. The G3's white balance performs well here, producing
only slight color casts. The Daylight white
balance setting did the best job here, with good skin tones, despite
a slightly cool color balance overall. The Auto
setting was a little too warm, and the Manual
setting seemed a little cool, with pale skin tones. Even with the slightly
cool Daylight white balance, the blue background has purplish tints
that aren't in the original image. The blue robe looks nearly right,
although again purplish in the shadow areas. Resolution is very high,
with excellent detail in the embroidery of the blue robe. (The original
data file for this poster was only 20MB though, so cameras like the
G3 are definitely capable of showing more detail than the poster has
in it.)
About average macro area with great detail, though the flash has
trouble this close.
The G3 performed well in the macro category, capturing a minimum area
of 2.93 x 2.20 inches (74 x 56 millimeters). Resolution is very high,
with strong detail in the brooch, coins, and dollar bill. Corner softness
is present in this shot, and extends down the entire left side of the
frame. This is a very common failing of digicam lenses in ultra-macro
shots, most likely caused by the optical phenomena called "curvature
of field." The G3's flash had trouble
throttling down for the macro area, likely due to the close shooting
range and proximity to the lens. Thus, the resulting image is overexposed
in the top left corner, with a shadow in the lower right corner from
the lens barrel.
Good exposure and excellent color, with accurate saturation.
Though I picked the Auto white balance setting
for the main image, the Manual setting produced
very good results as well. The Daylight setting
also resulted in good color, though the white color block and resolution
target are just a bit warm. Exposure looks about right, and the G3 has
no trouble distinguishing the subtle tonal variations of the Q60 target.
Colors are bright and vibrant in the large color blocks, though the
red and blue color blocks are slightly oversaturated. The shadow area
of the charcoal briquettes has strong detail, with low noise, and the
last steps of both gray scales are just barely distinguishable. Overall,
a really excellent performance on this target.
Low-Light Tests
Excellent low-light performance, with good color balance and low
noise, well beyond average city street lighting at night.
The G3 performs very well in this category, given its full manual exposure
control and maximum exposure time of 15 seconds. The G3 produced clear,
bright images down to the 1/16 foot-candle (0.67 lux) limit of my test,
with good color at all four ISO settings. Overall color balance is a
hint magenta, but still very good. The G3 automatically employs a Noise
Reduction system at slower shutter speeds, which does an excellent job
of keeping noise in check. Even at ISO 400, noise is only a little high,
but with such a fine grain that it's less obtrusive than that on many
cameras. The table below shows the best exposure I was able to obtain
for each of a range of illumination levels. (For reference, a level
of 1 foot-candle (fc) is about equivalent to average city streetlighting
at night.) Images in this table (like all of our sample photos) are
untouched, exactly as they came from the camera.
1fc
11lux
1/2fc
5.5lux
1/4fc
2.7lux
1/8fc
1.3lux
1/16fc
0.67lx
ISO
50
2 sec
F/2
ISO: 50
4 sec
F/2
ISO: 50
8 sec
F/2
ISO: 50
15 sec
F/2
ISO: 50
15 sec
F/2
ISO: 50
ISO
100
1/ 1 sec
F/2
ISO: 100
2 sec
F/2
ISO: 100
4 sec
F/2
ISO: 100
8 sec
F/2
ISO: 100
15 sec
F/2
ISO: 100
ISO
200
1/ 3 sec
F/2
ISO: 200
1 sec
F/2
ISO: 200
2 sec
F/2
ISO: 200
4 sec
F/2
ISO: 200
8 sec
F/2
ISO: 200
ISO
400
1/6 sec
F/2
ISO: 400
1/ 2 sec
F/2
ISO: 400
1 sec
F/2
ISO: 400
2 sec
F/2
ISO: 400
3.2 sec
F/2
ISO: 400
Love high ISO photography?
Hate noise? Check out Fred Miranda's ISO-R noise-reducing
actions for Photoshop. Incredible noise reduction, with
*no* loss of subject detail. (Pretty amazing, IMHO.) Check
it out!
Flash Range Test
A powerful flash, with only a little falloff at the 14 foot limit
of our test. (Canon states 16.5 foot range with the lens in its wide
angle position, the shots below are slightly towards telephoto, with
a slightly smaller aperture.)
Canon rates the G3's flash as effective from 2.3 to 16.5 feet (0.7
to 5.0 meters), and to a maximum of 13.1 feet (0.4 meters) at full telephoto.
In my testing, the flash illuminated the test target all the way out
to 14 feet, without any significant decrease in intensity. Below is
the flash range series, with distances from eight to 14 feet from the
target.
Very high resolution, 1,100 lines of "strong detail."
Average barrel and pincushion distortion.
The G3 performed very well on our "laboratory" resolution
test chart. It started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions
as low as 800 lines per picture height, in both horizontal and vertical
directions. I found "strong detail" out to at least 1,100
lines horizontally, and perhaps 1,050 lines in the horizontal direction.
"Extinction" of the target patterns didn't occur until about
1,600 lines.
Optical distortion on the G3 is slightly better than average at the
wide-angle end, where I measured an approximate 0.7 percent barrel distortion.
The telephoto end fared better, as I measured a 0.3 percent pincushion
distortion, although this lower level of pincushion distortion at the
telephoto setting seems to be typical of cameras I've tested. Chromatic
aberration is very low, showing only about two or three pixels of very
faint coloration on either side of the target lines. (This distortion
is visible as a very slight colored fringe around the objects at the
edges of the field of view on the resolution target.) The most obvious
distortion I noticed was some corner softness, particularly along the
left side of the frame.
A tight optical viewfinder, but nearly 100 percent accuracy with
the LCD monitor.
The G3's optical viewfinder is a little tight, showing 86 percent
frame accuracy at both wide angle and telephoto zoom settings. The
LCD monitor proved much more accurate, showing almost exactly 100
percent accuracy at both zoom settings. Actually, the top measurement
lines were just barely cut off, but framing was almost exact. Given
that I like LCD monitors to be as close to 100 percent accuracy as
possible, the G3's LCD monitor performs well in that regard. Flash
distribution is bright and even in the center of the frame at wide
angle, with falloff at the corners of the frame. At telephoto, flash
distribution is more uniform, though slightly dim.