Resources
Digital Cameras
Accessories
Tutorials
News
Forums
Search
About Us
Could you spare a few dollars to help someone who needs it? Support our adopted charity House of Hope. Click for more info.
|
Digital Camera Home >
Digital Camera Reviews > Sony Digital Cameras >
Sony Cybershot DSC-P93
Digital Cameras - Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-P93 Test Images
| I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated
index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information
on the images, including shutter speed, ISOsetting, compression setting,
etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all*that detail, we're posting
the Thumber index so only those interested inthe information need wade through
it! |
| Outdoor Portrait:
High resolution with a lot of fine detail. Good overall color, though
exposure is bright and contrast is high.
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the DSC-P93 did a pretty good job, but
its contrast was very high, even with its contrast control at its "-"
setting.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.3
EV exposure compensation adjustment, which resulted in somewhat dark
midtones, but less loss of detail in the highlights than at the +0.7
EV setting. I shot the main series with Auto
white balance setting, though the Daylight
setting resulted in nearly identical color.
Marti's skin tones are pretty good here, although a little on the pinkish
side, but the blue flowers in the bouquet are slightly dark, and quite
purplish. (Many digicams have trouble with this blue, the P93 falls about
into the middle of the pack, not doing as good a job as the P73 did with
this subject.) The strong reds and greens in the flower bouquet look about
right, though the red flowers are slightly oversaturated. Resolution is
high, and detail is strong in the flower bouquet, house siding, and in
Marti's features. Details are slightly soft, however, and there's some
evidence of over-aggressive noise-suppression, particularly in some areas
of Marti's hair. Shadow detail is average, but with lower than average
noise.
To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 to +1.3 EV, see files P93OUTAM1.HTM
through P93OUTAP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
As was the case with the P73, I guessed wrong about the exposure compensation
setting for the saturation and contrast series below, and never got a
chance to get back to reshoot the images before I had to ship the camera
back to Sony. (We've had unrelenting rainy weather here the last 3 weeks.)
See the Far Field and DaveBox shots below for better-exposed examples
of the functioning of these two controls
Saturation Series:
Contrast Series:
|
|
Closer Portrait:
Higher resolution with a lot of visible fine detail.
A hard time getting the right exposure with the camera's controls, and
contrast is a little high.
Overall results are similar to the wider shot above,
in terms of color and exposure, and the DSC-P93's 3x optical zoom lens
helps prevent any geometric distortion of Marti's features. The shot at
right was taken with a +0.3 EV exposure compensation adjustment. Midtones
here are bright, but the highlights are a little blown out. For some reason
though, the shot with 0 EV of exposure adjustment
was a lot darker, really too dark to be usable. (The ideal
exposure would have been somewhere in between the two.)
Resolution is higher in this close-up shot, with more visible fine detail
in Marti's hair, face, and on the house siding in the background.
To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 to +1.0 EV, see files P93FACM1.HTM
through P93FACP3.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
|
|
Indoor Portrait, Flash:
Normal Flash
High Intensity |
 |
Slow-Sync Flash
High Intensity |
 |
Underexposed at the default flash setting, but good coverage and color
with the normal flash mode at high intensity.
The DSC-P93's built-in flash underexposed this subject somewhat at its
Normal intensity setting. Coverage was slightly
uneven, with a vignette effect around Marti. I chose the High
intensity setting for the main shot, although the resulting effect is
a little harsh. Overall color looks pretty good, with only a few orange
tints from the background incandescent lighting. I also shot with the
camera's Slow-Sync flash mode, and again chose
the High intensity setting for the main image. The longer exposure allows
more ambient light into the image, which evens out the exposure, but greatly
increases the orange color cast.
Normal Mode Flash Exposure Series:
Slow-Sync Mode Flash Exposure Series:
|
|
Indoor Portrait, No Flash:
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Incandescent White Balance |
 |
Warm color balances with both white balance settings. Exposure is
almost right, though the highlights are hot.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs
used for the lighting. The DSC-P93's Auto white
balance setting produced a strong warm cast, with an orange tint. The
Incandescent setting also resulted in a warm
image, but to a lesser degree. Marti's skin tone is slightly orange, and
the blue flowers are dark and purplish. The best exposure was obtained
with a +0.7 EV exposure compensation adjustment, though the highlights
on the white shirt are on the verge of blowing out.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files P93INTP0.HTM
through P93INTP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
ISO Series:
Like most current 4- and 5-megapixel consumer-level digicams, the DSC-P93
shows some image noise here, even at its lowest ISO setting of 100. The
noise climbs very gradually from that point though, and even at ISO 400,
the image is quite usable. While there is some evidence (in the form of
suppressed detail in areas of subtle contrast) that the anti-noise processing
is working overtime, the overall result here is quite a bit better than
average, at least among the current crop of cameras that the P93 competes
against.
|
|
House Shot:
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
High resolution and detail, with fairly accurate color.
The DSC-P93's Auto white balance setting
produced the best overall color here, with a nearly accurate white value
on the house trim. The Daylight setting
also resulted in good color, though with a slight warm cast. Resolution
is high, and detail is strong in the tree limbs above the roof, as well
as in the house and front shrubbery. Details are once again slightly soft
throughout the frame, though the same level of sharpness is maintained
from corner to corner.
|
|
Far-Field Test
High resolution with strong detail. Dynamic range is a bit limited,
however. (Apologies for the tilt!)
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field
lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to
the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio.
The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different than in this
shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on
the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general
though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail,
and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most
likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks,
or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the
DSC-P93 does a great job. Detail is strong in the tree limbs over the
roof, as well as in the fine foliage in front of the house, with good
definition in the leaves and trunk details. In-camera sharpening does
a pretty good job here (although careful unsharp masking in Photoshop(tm)
can bring out a lot more detail), without relatively little softness in
the corners. The camera does lose essentially all detail in the bright
white paint on the bay windows, but does somewhat better in the shadow
area above the front door. (The white paint on the window is a difficult
area for many digicams.) Exposure is a little bright, but color is pretty
good. The table below shows a standard resolution and quality series,
followed by ISO, sharpness, saturation, contrast, and effects series.
(Apologies for the slanted pictures here - I was extremely pressed
for time, to squeeze these shots off before the clouds took over again,
so ended up with the tripod tilted slightly. - And we never got a clear
afternoon again before I had to ship the camera back to Sony. It's been
a *very* rainy/cloudy summer in Atlanta, this year!)
Resolution Series:
ISO Series:
As we saw above, the P93 shows some noise even at ISO 100, but it
doesn't seem to escalate as rapidly with increasing ISO as does that of
most cameras I've tested. Fairly aggressive anti-noise processing does
tend to flatten-out subtle detail though.
Sharpness Series:
The P93's default sharpness setting leaves its images slightly soft-looking.
The "+" setting over-sharpens somewhat, producing halos, but
would probably work fine for images printed on an inkjet printer at relatively
small size. Most interesting is how its images shot with the "-"
setting respond to unsharp masking in Photoshop(tm). With very strong
sharpening at a small radius (try 400%, 0.4 pixel radius), surprising
amounts of detail are revealed.
Saturation Series:
The P93's color saturation control covers a photographically useful
range, with reasonable steps between its settings.
Contrast Series:
The P93's contrast adjustment works fairly well, but its effect is
limited almost entirely to the shadows. To preserve highlight detail under
harsh lighting, you'd need to shoot at the low contrast setting, and at
the same time dial down the exposure compensation as well. While this
works well enough, I much prefer contrast controls that pull in the highlights
and shadows equally.
Effects Series:
|
|
Lens Zoom Range
An average 3x zoom range.
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto (3x,
in this case), and at full telephoto with the digital zoom enabled. The
DSC-P93's lens is equivalent to a 38-114mm zoom on a 35mm camera. This
corresponds to a moderate wide angle to a pretty good telephoto. Following
are the results at each zoom setting.
|
|
Musicians Poster
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
Slightly warm color balance. Good resolution and strong detail.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. The DSC-P93's white balance system did a pretty
good job though, the Auto white balance setting
producing a slight reddish cast, the Daylight
setting a somewhat warmer image. I preferred the models' skin tones under
the more neutral cast of the Auto setting, and so chose it for the main
image. The reddish cast gives the blue background purplish tints in the
darker areas, and the shadows of the blue robe tend towards purple as
well. Resolution is high, with a lot of fine detail visible in the embroidery
of the blue robe, red vest, and in the beaded necklaces and flower garland.
|
|
Macro Shot
|
Standard Macro Shot |
 |
|
Macro Shot with Flash |
 |
About average macro performance, but high resolution and strong detail.
The position of the flash results in uneven lighting.
The DSC-P93 turned in about an average performance in the macro category,
capturing a minimum area of 3.69 x 2.77 inches (94 x 70 millimeters).
Resolution is very high, with strong detail in the dollar bill, coins,
and brooch. Details were sharp in the center of the frame, though all
four corners of the frame were fairly soft. (A common failing in digicams'
macro shooting.) Exposure is about right, but color balance is warm from
the Auto white balance setting. The DSC-P93's flash
is too far to the side of the camera to provide even coverage for the
closest macro shots. Plan on using external lighting when shooting up
close.
|
|
"Davebox" Test Target
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
Good overall exposure, but a warm color cast with both Auto and Daylight
white balance settings.
Both the DSC-P93's Auto and Daylight
white balance settings produced nearly identical images with strong warm
casts. Because the Auto setting had the lesser cast, I chose it for the
main image, but there's still quite a bit more color cast than I'd like
to see. Exposure is about right (maybe a hint dim), and the DSC-P93 has
no trouble distinguishing the subtle tonal variations of the Q60 target.
The large color blocks are warm, but with good saturation. The additive
primary colors (red, green, and blue) are a bit oversaturated though.
Detail is moderate in the shadow area of the charcoal briquettes, with
low noise.
As is often the case, the results for ISO, Saturation, and Contrast series
with the Davebox target are pretty consistent with what we saw above.
I repeat these series with this target though, to provide interested readers
with examples better suited to quantitative evaluation.
ISO Series:
Saturation Series:
Contrast Series:
Effects Series:
|
|
Low-Light Tests
Surprisingly good low-light performance, with good color and fairly
low image noise. Very good low-light focusing as well.
The DSC-P93 produced clear, bright, usable images down to the 1/16 foot-candle
(0.67 lux) limit of my test, with good color at all three ISO settings.
(At ISO 100, the shot at the lowest light level is slightly dim, but the
image was still usable.) Color looks about right, though takes on a reddish
cast at the lower light levels. Image noise is very low with the 100 ISO
setting, and is only moderately high at ISO 400. (Interestingly, while
the P93's image noise here measures higher numerically than that of the
DSC-P73, to my eye, it's much less objectionable, perhaps in part because
it tends to have a finer grain pattern.) Nice, too, is that the P93 can
focus in complete darkness (on nearby subjects, at least), thanks to its
autofocus illuminator. Even without the AF assist light, it can routinely
focus down to 1/8 foot-candle, a very low light level. The table below
shows the best exposure I was able to obtain for each of a range of illumination
levels. Images in this table (like all sample photos) are untouched, exactly
as they came from the camera.
(Note: If you'd like to use a light meter to
check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a
light level of one foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two
seconds at f/2.8 and ISO 100.)
| |
1 fc
11 lux |
1/2 fc
5.5 lux |
1/4 fc
2.7 lux |
1/8 fc
1.3 lux |
1/16 fc
0.67 lux |
ISO
100 |

3 sec
f3.5 |

7 sec
f3.5 |

13 sec
f3.5 |

30 sec
f3.5 |

30 sec
f3.5 |
ISO
200 |

1.6 sec
f3.5 |

3 sec
f3.5 |

8 sec
f3.5 |

15 sec
f3.5 |

30 sec
f3.5 |
ISO
400 |

1 sec
f3.5 |

2 sec
f3.5 |

4 sec
f3.5 |

10 sec
f3.5 |

15 sec
f3.5 |
|
|
Flash Range Test
A moderately bright flash, but range is limited to 9-10 feet at telephoto.
In my testing, the DSC-P93's flash illuminated the test target all the
way out to 14 feet, though with a progressive decrease in intensity starting
at 9 feet. (The same performance as I found with the DSC-P73, no surprise,
as the electronics is the same in the two cameras.) Below is the flash
range series, with distances from eight to 14 feet from the target.
| 8 ft |
9 ft |
10 ft |
11 ft |
12 ft |
13 ft |
14 ft |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |
|
|
ISO-12233 (WG-18) Resolution Test
High resolution, 1,300 - 1,350 lines of "strong detail."
High barrel distortion at wide angle, and a moderate amount at telephoto.
The DSC-P93 performed well on the "laboratory" resolution test
chart. It started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions
as low as 1,000~1,100 lines per picture height in both the vertical and
horizontal directions. I found "strong detail" out to at least
1,300 lines vertically, though to about 1,350 lines horizontally. "Extinction"
of the target patterns didn't occur until about 1,650 lines.
Optical distortion on the DSC-P93 is higher than average at the wide-angle
end, where I measured approximately 1.0 percent barrel distortion. The
telephoto end fared a little better, as I measured approximately 0.3 percent
barrel distortion there. low to moderate, showing about four or five very
faint pixels of fairly faint coloration on either side of the target lines.
(This distortion is visible as a very slight colored fringe around the
objects at the edges of the field of view on the resolution target.)
Resolution Series, ~50mm equivalent focal length
Resolution Test, Wide Angle
Resolution Test, Telephoto
Sharpness Series
|
Viewfinder Accuracy/Flash Uniformity
A rather tight optical viewfinder, but an accurate LCD monitor.
The DSC-P93's optical viewfinder is pretty tight, showing only about
82 percent of the final frame at both wide angle and telephoto zoom
settings. The LCD monitor fared much better. (It was actually very slightly
loose, as the measurement lines wound up outside the final frame.) Given
that I like LCD monitors to be as close to 100 percent accuracy as possible,
the DSC-P93's LCD monitor just very well, just remember to allow a little
extra space when precise framing is key. Flash distribution is uneven
at wide angle, with strong falloff at the corners and edges of the frame.
At telephoto, flash distribution is more uniform, with only very slight
falloff in the corners.
|
|
|
|

Free Photo Lessons
|
|