I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated
index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information
on the images, including shutter speed, ISOsetting, compression setting,
etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all*that detail, we're posting
the Thumber index so only those interested inthe information need wade through
it!
Good resolution and detail, but higher than average image noise and
some trouble with high contrast. Good color.
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the Optio S4i produced good color, but
had a little trouble with exposure.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure
compensation adjustment. The strongest highlight detail is lost, despite
the midtones and shadows being somewhat dark. When I shot this,
I had the contrast adjustment dialed down one notch, it looks like I should
have shot with the contrast set to its minimum value, as even here, the
camera has difficulty with the deliberately harsh lighting. I chose the
Auto white balance as the most accurate overall,
though it produced a similar color balance to the Daylight
setting (both are just slightly reddish). The Manual
white balance resulted in a much warmer image.
Marti's skin tones here are just about right, with just a slight pinkish
tinge to them, but the blue flowers in the bouquet are a bit darker and
more purplish than in real life. (Many digicams have trouble with this
blue, which is actually a light navy blue with just tinges of purple in
it.) The strong reds, yellows, and greens look about right, although saturation
is just a hint low. Resolution is high, and detail is strong in the flowers
and in Marti's features, but higher than average image noise obscures
some detail in the midtones and shadows. The red flowers also have an
artifact-like appearance in the highlights.
To view the entire exposure series from 0 to +1.0 EV, see files S4IOUTAP0.HTM
through S4IOUTAP3.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Saturation Series:
Unusual to find in a subcompact digicam, the S4i has an optional color
saturation adjustment that lets you boost or cut the "brightness"
of its color. The range covered is a good one, with nice, small steps
permitting pretty fine-grained adjustment of the camera's color response.
Really, an "enthusiast" feature, but nice to find in a subcompact
digicam.
Contrast Series:
Likewise very unusual for a subcompact digicam, the S4i also has an optional
contrast adjustment. It provides a reasonably good ability to deal with
harsh lighting as seen in this test subject, but I'd like to see its range
extend further in the low-contrast direction. The contrast adjustment
seems to affect the shadows somewhat more than the highlights. It's fairly
well balanced, but you'll probably want to drop the overall exposure as
you decrease the contrast setting, and vice versa. Overall though, a good
implementation of a very useful feature.
Higher resolution with strong detail, still slightly
noisy.
Color and exposure are similar to the wider shot
above, and the Optio S4i's 3x optical zoom lens helps prevent any geometric
distortion of Marti's features. (Close-up portraits are one reason why
it's nice to have a zoom lens on your camera.) The shot at right was taken
with a +0.3 EV exposure compensation adjustment, yielding a pretty good
overall exposure. Midtones are about where they should be, but the highlights
are pretty hot and blown out. Detail and resolution are stronger in this
close-up shot, with good definition in Marti's hair and skin. Image noise
is again a bit higher than average, although I didn't find the noise in
this shot as distracting as that in the wider view above. Details also
seem a little soft overall.
To view the entire exposure series from 0 to +1.0 EV, see files S4IFACAP0.HTM
through S4IFACAP3.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Somewhat underexposed, but good coverage. Warm color balance from
the background lighting.
The Optio S4i's built-in flash illuminated the subject fairly well at
its default exposure setting, but the image
was a little underexposed. Unfortunately, the exposure compensation adjustment
doesn't seem to affect flash exposure at all, as witnessed by the +1.3
EV adjustment sample seen at right. Overall color is a little warm,
with an orange cast from the fairly strong incandescent lighting in the
room. (Fairly typical of a typical home environment where you might want
to shoot with the flash for added brightness. While a little dim, fairly
minor exposure adjustment in software would fix up the image nicely, albeit
at the cost of making the image noise more apparent. To view the entire
exposure series from 0 to +1.3 EV, see files S4IINFM1.HTM through S4IINFP4.HTM
on the thumbnail index page.
Very good color with both manual and auto white balance, but slightly
low exposure. Noise is high, and obscures detail.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs
used for the lighting. The Optio S4i's Manual
white balance setting did the best job here, despite a very slight greenish
cast. The Incandescent setting also produced
very good results, but with more of a reddish tint than I'd like. (Although
some people will prefer the warmer cast in the Incandescent version, as
being more faithful to the original lighting.) The Auto
setting had a lot of trouble, and produced a strong warm cast. The shot
at right was taken with a +1.0 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, which is just slightly bright, with Marti's shot
a little too "hot." At +0.7 EV, the
white shirt came out better, but I felt that Marti's face was a bit too
dark. (Yet another situation where post-capture tweaking might be in line.)
Despite the greenish cast with the Manual white balance option, overall
color looks pretty good, though the blue flowers are dark and purplish
(usually to be expected with this light source). Detail is good, but image
noise is a bit higher than average and reduces definition (especially
in the flower details, particularly the red flower).
ISO Series:
Noise is moderate even at the S4i's ISO 50 setting, and only increases
from there, with a strong grain pattern that interferes with subject detail.
At ISO 400, the noise pattern is so strong that a visible pattern of diagonal
lines develops. As with most consumer-level digicams these days, I really
wouldn't consider the S4i to be usable at ISO 400. (Somewhat more disturbing
though, is that the camera will boost the ISO to 400 under even moderate
lighting, if you have its ISO option set to the "auto" position.
This can leave the user with unexpectedly noisy images, when shooting
indoors or under even slightly dim conditions.)
Fairly high resolution and good color. Quite a bit of softness in
the corners though.
The Optio S4i's Manual white balance setting
produced the best overall color here, with nearly identical results to
the Daylight setting. Surprisingly, the
Auto setting was actually a bit warm. Resolution
is fairly high, with good detail in the tree limbs and front shrubbery.
(Not nearly up to the best full-sized four-megapixel cameras, but not
bad for a subcompact model.) Image noise here is higher than average,
but the biggest problem is the softness in the corners, which extends
fairly far into the frame. - This seems to be a particular problem in
images shot at fairly close range with the S4i: The effect is present
in shots of more distant subjects as well, but not nearly to the same
extent.
However, image noise and strong corner softness decrease clarity and definition.
Corner softness is strongest on the left side of the frame, and extends
almost to the center of the image.
Fairly high resolution and detail, but image quality doesn't approach
that of the best full-sized four-megapixel cameras. Good overall color,
but the camera overexposed the scene slightly.
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field
lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to
the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio.
The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different than in this
shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on
the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general
though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail,
and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most
likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks,
or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the
Optio S4i captures a lot of fine detail, but clearly not as much as the
best full-sized four-megapixel cameras can manage. (It's an unfortunate
fact of life that ultra-small digicams almost unavoidably require tradeoffs
in image quality relative to full-sized models.) The tree limbs over the
roof and fine foliage in front of the house show a fair bit of detail,
but there's some loss due to flare and general softness. Once again, there's
a fair bit of softness in the corners of the image, extending fairly far
into the frame, but it doesn't seem quite as pronounced as with the House
poster in the previous test. The S4i overexposed this subject somewhat,
which leads to the loss of essentially all detail in the bright white
paint of the bay window (a problem area for many cameras), but that does
help with detail in the deep shadows around the front door. Overall color
looks good, but the saturation is a little low from the overexposure.
The table below shows a standard resolution and quality series, followed
by ISO, sharpness, saturation, and contrast series.
ISO Series: Much the same results as before. Visible noise even at ISO 50, higher
than average, but probably acceptable up to ISO 200, unusable (IMHO) images
at ISO 400.
Sharpness Series:
A very useful range of sharpness options. The strongest sharpens without
going too far overboard, would look good in moderate-sized inkjet prints.
The lowest option takes unsharp masking in Photoshop(tm) very well, recovering
surprising detail. (Try 300%, 0.4 pixel radius.)
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto (3x,
in this case), and at full telephoto with the digital zoom enabled. The
Optio S4i's lens is equivalent to a 35-105mm zoom on a 35mm camera. That
corresponds to an average wide angle to a moderate telephoto, a very typical
range for digicams. Following are the results at each zoom setting.
A slightly reddish color cast, and a dim exposure, but pretty good
detail. Image noise is again higher than average.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. The Optio S4i's Auto
white balance setting fell victim to this trap, producing a very warm
color balance. The Daylight setting produced
better results, though with a slight red cast. I chose the Manual
setting for the main shot, though it too was just slightly reddish. Still,
overall color is good. The blue background is purplish in spots from the
red cast, and the deep shadows of the blue robe are also purplish. Skin
tones are pretty good, if a bit pale. Resolution is high, with pretty
good definition in the embroidery of the blue robe. However, as I've noticed
in some of the other shots, higher than average image noise obscures the
finer details, making them appear pixilated. The S4i also slightly underexposed
this shot, increasing the color saturation a little, and probably contributing
at least somewhat to the higher noise levels.
A small macro area with good detail. Flash does well up close.
The Optio S4i captured a small macro area in its normal
macro mode, measuring 3.26 x 2.44 inches (83 x 62 millimeters). In
Super Macro mode, performance is even better,
with a minimum area of only 1.58 x 1.18 inches (40 x 30 millimeters).
Resolution is high in both shots, although the color is slightly yellowish.
Corner softness is strong in all four corners of the frame (a common failing
in digicam ultra-macro modes), but is the most obvious on the left side.
The Optio S4i's flash throttled down pretty
well for the macro area, the glare from the brooch isn't really the camera's
fault, it's just that the brooch is reflecting the flash right back into
the lens.
Slightly warm color balance, but still very good color overall. Limited
shadow detail though.
The Optio S4i's Auto and Daylight
white balance settings produced similar, slightly warm results here, while
the Manual option produced a nearly perfect
color balance. Exposure is good, and the camera distinguishes the subtle
tonal variations of the Q60 target pretty well. The large color blocks
show excellent hue accuracy, and only very slightly low saturation. That
said, the large red and blue blocks are quite vibrant. The shadow area
of the charcoal briquettes shows rather limited detail though, and image
noise there is fairly high.
ISO, Saturation, and Contrast controls all produced essentially identical
results to what we saw above, so I won't bother repeating my earlier comments
here. - This target is useful for making very quantitative evaluations
of the various controls' action, so I've included a full set of sample
images here.
Limited low-light performance, with higher than average image noise.
Autofocus works down to about 0.75 foot-candle. (Should just handle typical
city night scenes.)
The Optio S4i produced bright, usable images down to 1/2 foot-candle
at ISO 50, and 1/4 foot-candle at ISO 100 and above. Like some other cameras,
the S4i's maximum exposure time varies with the ISO setting chosen. At
ISO 50 and 100, the maximum exposure time is 4 seconds, but that drops
to 2 seconds at ISO 200, and 1 second at ISO 400. Thus, while higher ISO
settings will help you maintain higher shutter speeds at any given light
level, they don't extend the camera's ultimate low light ability. The
color balance is warm from the Auto white balance, and image noise is
higher than average at all ISO levels. The S4i's autofocus system works
down to light levels of about 0.75 foot-candle, and there's no autofocus-assist
light to help at darker light levels. Typical city street lighting at
night corresponds to a light level of about one foot-candle, so the S4i
should have little trouble shooting under such conditions, but it won't
be able to go much darker than that. The table below shows the best exposure
I was able to obtain for each of a range of illumination levels. Images
in this table (like all sample photos) are untouched, exactly as they
came from the camera.
(Note: If you'd like to use a light meter to
check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a
light level of one foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two
seconds at f/2.8 and ISO 100.)
1 fc
11 lux
1/2 fc
5.5 lux
1/4 fc
2.7 lux
1/8 fc
1.3 lux
1/16 fc
0.67 lux
ISO
50
2 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
ISO
100
1 sec
f2.6
2.5 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
4 sec
f2.6
ISO
200
1/1 sec
f2.6
1.3 sec
f2.6
2 sec
f2.6
2 sec
f2.6
2 sec
f2.6
ISO
400
1/3 sec
f2.6
1/1 sec
f2.6
1 sec
f2.6
1 sec
f2.6
1 sec
f2.6
Flash Range Test
A weak flash, underexposing even at the shortest range.
Limited flash range is a very common shortcoming of subcompact digicams,
and the S4i is no exception. In my testing, the Optio S4i's flash was
quite dim even at the shortest distances I test at (8 feet). The flash
will probably be adequate for supplemental illumination in night shots
at very close range, but it clearly wouldn't be your first choice if nighttime
photography is at all important to you. Below is the flash range series,
with distances from eight to 14 feet from the target.
High resolution, 1,200 lines of "strong detail." High barrel
distortion and corner softness.
The Optio S4i performed fairly well on the "laboratory" resolution
test chart. It started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions
as low as 800 lines per picture height vertically, but as low as about
600 lines horizontally. I found "strong detail" out to at least
1,200 lines horizontally, and to around 1,100 lines in the vertical direction.
"Extinction" of the target patterns occurred around 1,500 lines.
Optical distortion on the Optio S4i is very high at the wide-angle end,
where I measured approximately 1.1 percent barrel distortion. The telephoto
end fared much better, as I found only 0.1 percent barrel distortion there
(about three pixels). Chromatic aberration is moderate, showing about
seven or eight pixels of relatively faint coloration on either side of
the target lines. (This distortion is visible as a very slight colored
fringe around the objects at the edges of the field of view on the resolution
target.) The biggest optical shortcoming of the S4i's lens though, is
the fairly severe softness in the corners of its images, extending quite
far into the frame.
A very tight optical viewfinder, but an accurate LCD monitor.
The Optio S4i's optical viewfinder is very tight, showing only about
72 percent frame accuracy at wide angle, and about 77 percent at telephoto.
Images framed with the optical viewfinder are also tilted slightly,
likely due to a shifted CCD chip. The LCD monitor performed much better,
showing approximately 99 percent frame accuracy at both zoom settings.
Given that I like LCD monitors to be as close to 100 percent accuracy
as possible, the Optio S4i's LCD monitor is essentially perfect in that
regard. Flash distribution is uneven at wide angle, with significant
falloff at the corners and edges of the frame. At telephoto, flash distribution
is more even, but very dim.