Expecting SLRGear.com? We’re moving our lens reviews to Imaging Resource! Read about it here.

Tamron 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical IF Macro AF

 
Lens Reviews / Tamron Lenses i Not yet tested

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Tamron 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical IF Macro AF
28-200mm $130
average price
image of Tamron 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical IF Macro AF

(From Tamron lens literature) Tamron has made this lightweight, compact high power zoom lens available with the Di optical system with improved multi-coating for digital SLR cameras as well as film cameras, further enhancing its ease of use and popularity.

Tamron 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical IF Macro AF User Reviews

7.5/10 average of 2 reviews Build Quality 8.0/10 Image Quality 6.5/10
Write your own review! link will open to SLRgear.com
  • 10 out of 10 points and recommended by (37 reviews)
    big zoom range and extremely sharp betwee 50 and 135mm
    some CA's, sometimes visible

    it is comprehensible that it is very difficult for a manufacturer of lenses to correct image mistakes of such a big zoom range.

    Nevertheless the middle range is phantastic; the extremes of tele and wide angle are still very good, with some CA's. ok. But everybody has a good photo program, nowadays.

    With Phsh 4 or 8 I can eliminate the CA's quickly by a hidden switch. And if I sharpem the extremes additionally, this lens allows me big posters up to 15x20" with a good cam.

    very highly recommended by me.

    reviewed January 3rd, 2015 (purchased for $80)
  • 5 out of 10 points and not recommended by (17 reviews)
    size, range, weight, price
    wide open performance is soft, 28mm on the wide end is restricting on a 1.6x crop

    It's not bad for a 7x zoom that's REALLY cheap. But then... it's REALLY cheap. It's soft especially at the long end while wide open. If you stop it down to f8 to f11, it's acceptable.

    If you really need the telephoto capability, the either of the most recent 70-300 tamrons are significantly better performers for a similar price. If you NEED the zoom range, I'd strongly suggest shelling out for the more expensive 18-200 or 28-300, both of which are far better performers, although they are nearly twice as expensive.

    reviewed December 14th, 2006 (purchased for $180)