Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM
Lab Test Results
(From Canon lens literature) Canon's newest fixed length L-series lens, the EF 24mm ƒ/1.4L II USM, incorporates the newest in Canon lens technology for spectacular sharpness and impressive performance at all settings.
January 12, 2009
by Andrew Alexander
The Canon EF 24mm ƒ/1.4L II USM was introduced in the lead-up to Photokina 2008, as an update to its pre-existing 24mm ƒ/1.4. Introduced in December 1997, the previous version of the 24mm ƒ/1.4 was probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, despite having all the fixtures and trimmings of an L-class USM lens.
The upgrade to the lens is fairly substantial; it features 8 diaphragm blades in the aperture instead of 7, and the blades are now rounded. The lens elements have been regrouped, and an additional group is now present. Two ultra-low dispersion (UD) glass elements are used instead of just one. Finally, the new version of this lens is slightly heavier (100 grams) and a bit longer and wider.
The EF lens is compatible with both full-frame and cropped-frame Canon SLR cameras, though on the latter the lens will have an effective field of view of approximately 38mm, negating some of the wide-angle appeal. However, for wide-angle glass in the Canon category, there's none faster. The lens ships with a petal-shaped lens hood and pouch, and is expected to retail for approximately $1,700.
The Canon 24mm ƒ/1.4L II is a very sharp lens, especially considering the wide angle of its focal length and the maximum aperture setting of ƒ/1.4. Sharpness wide open at ƒ/1.4 is the weak point for this lens. On the reduced-frame 20D, the crop factor focuses on the 'sweet spot' of the lens, producing a relatively sharp (1.5 BxU center, 3 BxU corners) image; on the full-frame 5D, corner softness is an issue, with the centers being relatively sharp at 1.5 BxU, but the corners showing up to 6 BxU of softness. It could be argued that these results are just the result of the effects of shooting a flat chart with a wide-angle lens, except that as the lens is stopped down, corner-to-corner sharpness becomes excellent. By ƒ/2.8, the lens produces practically tack-sharp images, improving marginally as the lens is stopped down through to ƒ/8.
Diffraction limiting seems to set in around ƒ/8, though the effects aren't really noticeable until ƒ/16, where the lens produces 2 BxU on both sub-frame and full-frame cameras. Performance fully stopped down at ƒ/22 is still excellent, at around 3 BxU across the frame.
One noteworthy aberration exists with the lens set to ƒ/2 on the full-frame 5D; central sharpness increases remarkably in comparison to ƒ/1.4, but corner softness also increases by 1-2 BxU. Stopping down to ƒ/2.8 reduces corner softness dramatically, and by ƒ/4 it's no longer a factor.
In summary, expect some measure of corner softness when using the lens at wide apertures on a full-frame camera body, but otherwise sharpness will be excellent with this lens.
The 24mm ƒ/1.4L II is well-treated to resist chromatic aberration. Our lab testing shows only slight evidence of CA in the corners when used at wider apertures, but in practical application (and looking at the sample images) we're challenged to find any at all.
On the reduced-frame 20D, the 24mm ƒ/1.4L II USM shows some signs of light falloff in the corners, when used at ƒ/1.4 (2/3EV) and ƒ/2 (1/3EV). By ƒ/2.8, corner shading dips below 1/4 EV, a negligible difference.
It's a completely different story with the lens mounted on the full-frame 5D. The lens produces extremely dark corners when used with large apertures; at ƒ/1.4, the corners of the image are almost two stops darker than the center! This reduces to one stop by ƒ/2.8, and by ƒ/5.6 the differential hovers at 2/3 of a stop all the way through to ƒ/22. For this reason, users of this lens will want to become familiar with vignetting correction in post-processing software, or invest in a center-weighted ND filter (if such exists in the 77mm mount).
Distortion is well-controlled in this lens. On the subframe 20D, the lens produces slight barrel distortion: 0.25% in the corners, to be exact. It's just slightly more prominent on the full-frame 5D, at 0.3% in the corners, but in both of these cases this is excellent performance for such a wide-angle lens.
Autofocus operation was very quick, well under a second to rack through the entire focus range. As a USM lens, focus action is conducted very quietly. The focus ring doesn't turn while autofocusing, and the user can override autofocus and focus manually at any point by turning the focus ring.
With a magnification ratio of 1:5.9 (0.17x), the 24mm ƒ/1.4L II is not a great choice for macro work. Its minimum close-focus distance is just under 10 inches (25cm), and the manual does indicate the lens is compatible with the EF12 II extension tube and 500C close-up filter.
Build Quality and Handling
The 24mm ƒ/1.4L II USM is built to very high standards, a good example of the price differential demanded by L-class lenses. The lens is solidly built, with weather and dust seals, a fine matte-black finish and a metal lens mount. The lens sports a 77mm plastic filter thread. The front lens element will not rotate during focus operations.
The lens is fairly front-heavy, with the larger lens elements being placed there; the overall package is quite heavy. The lens is adorned with a windowed distance scale in imperial and metric measurements, as well as a depth-of-field scale (complete with infrared index point). The only other feature apart from the focus ring is a switch which allows the user to disable autofocus operation on the lens.
The focus ring is mounted near the front of the lens with a nice rubber ribbed pattern that is well-dampened and easy to grip, and 3/4 of an inch wide. Manual focus operation is smooth and easy, taking approximately 120 degrees to go from closest focus to infinity. Both points of the spectrum end in hard stops, and it is possible to focus past infinity.
The EW-83K lens hood is a bayonet-mount, petal-shaped hood that adds two inches to the overall length of the lens when mounted. The hood reverses onto the lens for easy storage.
Canon EF 24mm ƒ/1.4L USM ~$1,100
The first obvious alternative would be the predecessor version of the lens, which should be available at considerable savings now that a newer version has hit the market. We haven't tested this version of the lens, so we can't tell you which is the better lens.
Canon EF 24mm ƒ/2.8 ~$300
If you didn't need the wide aperture (or didn't want the weight or expense of the ƒ/1.4 version), the ƒ/2.8 version of the 24mm prime is an option. However, our tests show that the ƒ/1.4 is head-and-shoulders above the ƒ/2.8 version, in all regards. In this case, you really do get what you pay for.
Sigma 24mm ƒ/1.8 EX DG Aspherical Macro ~$300
We haven't yet tested the Sigma 24mm, but there is definite opportunity for cost savings here. As well, the Sigma 24mm offers substantial macro performance.
The Canon 24mm ƒ/1.4L II USM is an excellent lens, with only two reservations, both relating to the lens' usage on full-frame bodies. The first is some corner softness when used at wide apertures; the second is substantial corner shading, upwards of two stops when used wide open. Both of these attributes could be considered features, contributing to the unique look produced by this lens, and in either case the performance is improved dramatically by stopping down just one or two stops. While we can't comment on whether its performance is better than the previous version of the lens (not having yet tested it) we can say that if you need a fast, wide-angle lens for your Canon camera, you won't be disappointed with this one.
The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens.
As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows.
Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM
Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM User Reviews
8 out of 10 points and recommended by realtormac (1 reviews)Very wide aperture for taking indoor photos without a flash - Paper thin depth of field at F1.4 provides capability to produce dramatic shots while still capturing much of the background to 'tell the story' - Good quality construction - Price range defini- Focusing speed a tad slow (but not enough to affect me on wedding photography)
When I first picked up photography, I have always wondered on the viability of spending large amounts of money for a fixed focal prime lens such as this. However, having cycled through quite a few Canon lenses and 'L' series lenses ranging from zoom lenses and other primes, I have arrived in front of this 24mm.reviewed December 9th, 2015 (purchased for $980)
It is no doubt an expensive lens BUT it can also provide you wish capabilities that other lenses cannot. As stated in my pros list, it has a very thin depth of field when used wide open and that really adds punch to your photos by making your subject 'pop' out more (when focused properly). This will definitely appeal to certain photographers and in my case wedding photos.
In my humble opinion, you need a full frame camera to really appreciate this lens. For wedding event photos, in many instances we would like to include as much of the scene as possible to 'tell the story' and we usually lose the dramatic effects from blurred/out-of-focus backgrounds when using the wide angle zooms with apertures limited to F2.8 and above. With this lens coupled to a full frame body, it allows the photographer to maintain both the coverage of the wide angle and the background blur.
As such, if you are looking for a lens to take photographs at F4.0 and above at 24mm, then I believe you are better off looking at the other canon zoom lenses (e.g. 17-40 F4L, 24-105 F4L, 16-35 f2.8L).
In terms of picture quality, it is very good wide open BUT not earth shaking. At F1.4, there are signs of purple fringing and definitely not as sharp when used a few stops down. However, it is barely noticeable unless you scrutinise under pixel peeping.
All in all, I have no reserves in shooting with this lens wide open and having printouts of A3 or A2 size.
I hope this gives an idea on the usage of this lens and assist anyone who is considering this lens to determine whether it is the right lens for them before making the big jump.
http://www.hitsticker.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.adstateagent.com
10 out of 10 points and recommended by fsnfs (1 reviews)IQ$$
Good Lens, Very sharpreviewed June 22nd, 2012 (purchased for $1,500)
It maks canon become nikon feeling
10 out of 10 points and recommended by kinematic (13 reviews)Very sharp lens, gorgeous build, amazing low light performance.Nothing major, but the lens hood is a touch too loose.
Currently my favourite prime to use. On my full frame this is such a versatile lens and I love the look it gives. It's not overly wide that it starts to distort like ultra wides, but it's wide enough to cover a good landscape shot, or to do fantastic environmental portait shots. I would defer to genotypewriter for his expertise on this lens. He has had a lot of experience with this lens.reviewed January 7th, 2011 (purchased for $1,600)
I really enjoy using this lens for late night astro photography based landscapes. Several friends of mine also use this lens for that kind of application and it's just such a treat to use.
I own several wide angle lenses (17-40L, 16-35L II, 14mm Prime) and it's one of the sharpest of the lot - the 14mm actually is a touch sharper.
As per SLR Gear's review, the vignetting is a bit extreme wide open, but it's very desirable to me. Even wide open this lens is pretty impressively sharp.
I also occasionally use this on a crop camera (7D) and it's actually quite nice on that camera as well. vignette is more reduced and it acts more like a 35mm would on my 5DmkII but I can't say too much more about this lens other than buy it!
10 out of 10 points and recommended by genotypewriter (12 reviews)very sharp and extremely handholdablenothing specific to this lens
Here is my very detailed review of the 24L II vs. Nikon 24mm f/1.4G (both on a 5D MkII):reviewed June 14th, 2010
9 out of 10 points and recommended by Cindy (1 reviews)Great upgrade!Difficult to find on the market currently
Sharp from 1.6 (can beat 16-35 at 2.8), no Vignetting from 2.8, No any flare. The weight is just same as 24-105.reviewed April 10th, 2009 (purchased for $1,899)