Resources
Digital Cameras
Accessories
Tutorials
News
Forums
Search
About Us
Could you spare a few dollars to help someone who needs it? Support our adopted charity House of Hope. Click for more info.
|
Digital Camera Home >
Digital Camera Reviews > Sony Digital Cameras >
Sony CyberShot DSC-W1
Digital Cameras - Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-W1 Test Images
| I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated
index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information
on the images, including shutter speed, ISOsetting, compression setting,
etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all*that detail, we're posting
the Thumber index so only those interested inthe information need wade through
it! |
| Outdoor
Portrait: High resolution with strong detail in the
flower bouquet, good exposure with a contrast adjustment. Accurate color.
The extreme tonal range of this image makes it a tough shot for many
digicams, which is precisely why I set it up this way, and why I shoot
it with no fill flash or reflector to open the shadows. The object is
to hold both highlight and shadow detail without producing a "flat"
picture with muddy colors, and the Cyber-Shot DSC-W1 did a pretty good
job, though contrast is quite high.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, which results in slightly dark midtones due to
the high contrast. The highlights have limited detail, as do the deep
shadows. I shot the main series with the camera's Low Contrast
setting, which did a good job of bringing the contrast back in line, though
the highlights are still quite bright. I chose the Auto
white balance as the most accurate overall, though the Daylight
setting also looked good.
Skin tones are about right, and the blue flowers in the bouquet look
pretty good as well. (Many digicams have trouble with this blue, and the
W1 does produce slight purplish tints in them. However, accuracy is pretty
good.) The strong reds and greens also look good, though the red flowers
do have a pinkish tint. Resolution is very high, with a lot of fine detail
visible in the flower bouquet and on Marti's features (though Marti is
a bit soft from the autofocus). Shadow detail is good, with moderately
low noise.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV, see files W1OUTAP0LC.HTM
through W1OUTAP3LC.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.
 |
 |
| Contrast was a bit high with the camera's
default contrast setting, under the deliberately harsh lighting of
this test. |
The W1's low contrast adjustment did
a good job of making the exposure more even, with only a slight decrease
in exposure. |
|
|
Closer
Portrait:
Excellent resolution and detail. Pretty good exposure,
but a contrast adjustment is again needed.
As with the wider portrait above, the W1 required
a Low contrast adjustment to get the most even exposure under the high-key
lighting of this shot. The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure
compensation adjustment, which is slightly higher than average. (You could
arguably use the shot taken with a +0.3 EV adjustment, but I felt it was
just a hair too dim.) The W1 features a 3x zoom lens, which helps prevent
strong distortion of Marti's features. Resolution and detail are much
higher in this close-up shot, though details are just slightly soft.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV, see files W1FACAP0LC.HTM
through W1FACAP3LC.HTM on the thumbnail
index page. |
|
Indoor Portrait,
Flash:
Normal Flash
High Intensity |
 |
Slow-Sync Flash
High Intensity |
 |
Slightly low intensity at the Normal flash power setting, but good
overall color and coverage.
The W1's built-in flash was somewhat dim at the Normal
intensity setting, though coverage was still fairly even. I chose the
High intensity setting for the main shot, though
the flash is a little strong and flattens color. (Here's a shot at the
Low intensity setting.) Overall color is pretty
accurate, and the flower bouquet looks reasonably accurate for a flash
exposure (though the blue flowers are a bit dark). The background incandescent
lighting results in a faint orange cast, noticeable only in a few places
(such as Marti's hair and in the shadows of the white shirt). The camera's
Slow-Sync flash mode increased the orange cast dramatically, since the
longer exposure allowed more ambient light into the image.
I again chose the High intensity setting, though
the Normal setting isn't too bad. (Click here
to see the Low intensity setting.)
|
|
Indoor Portrait,
No Flash:
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Incandescent White Balance |
 |
Warm color balances, but good exposure and low noise.
This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability,
given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs
used for the lighting. The W1's Auto
white balance had some difficulty with this light source, and produced
a strong yellow cast. The Incandescent
setting fared a little better, though it too had a bit of a yellow cast.
Though warm, color isn't too bad with the Incandescent setting. The blue
flowers in the bouquet are dark and purplish, and the bright red flowers
are a little oversaturated, but the strong greens and yellows are in check.
The shot at right was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure compensation adjustment,
which results in an even exposure.
To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.7 EV, see files W1INTP0.HTM
through W1INTP5.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.
ISO Series:
Noise is low on the W1. Even at the ISO 200 and 400 settings, noise is
only moderate, and with an inconspicuous grain pattern.
|
|
House Shot:
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
High resolution with strong detail and good color.
The W1's Auto
white balance setting did a good job here, producing a nearly accurate
white value on the house trim and good overall color. The Daylight
setting resulted in a warmer, yellow cast. Resolution is very high, and
detail is strong throughout the frame. The tree limbs and shrubbery show
good detail, as does the house front. (With a five-megapixel CCD, the
W1 stretches the limits of this poster as a test target, even though it
was made from a 500MB scan of a 4x5 negative shot with a tack-sharp lens.)
Details are reasonably sharp, from corner to corner.
|
|
Far-Field Test
Excellent resolution and detail, with accurate color. A bright exposure
limits the dynamic range, however.
This image is shot at infinity to test far-field
lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to
the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio.
The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different than in this
shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on
the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general
though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail,
and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most
likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks,
or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows.
This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the
DSC-W1 does an excellent job. The tree limbs over the roof and fine foliage
in front of the house show strong detail, with great definition in the
leaf patterns. In-camera sharpening does a good job here, with fairly
sharp details throughout the frame. The corners of the frame are just
slightly softer, however. The camera picks up a moderate amount of detail
in the bright white paint surrounding the bay window, which is a difficult
challenge for many digicams. (The bright exposure limits the camera's
dynamic range a fair amount here.) Detail is stronger in the shadow area
above the front door. Color looks good with the Auto
white balance setting (click here for the Daylight
white balance). The table below shows a standard resolution and quality
series, followed by ISO, sharpness, contrast, saturation, and color series.
Resolution Series:
ISO Series:
Sharpness Series:
Contrast Series:
Saturation Series:
Color Effects Series:
|
|
Lens Zoom Range
A typical 3x zoom range.
I routinely shoot this series of images to show the field of view for
each camera, with the lens at full wide angle, at maximum telephoto (3x,
in this case), and at full telephoto with the digital zoom enabled. The
DSC-W1's lens is equivalent to a 38-114mm zoom on a 35mm camera. That
corresponds to a moderate wide angle to a moderate telephoto. Following
are the results at each zoom setting.
|
|
Musicians Poster
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
Slight color casts with both white balances, but great resolution
and detail.
This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. As is sometimes the case with this shot, I chose
the slightly warm color balance of the Daylight
white balance setting over the cooler, more magenta Auto
setting. The warm cast gives the blue background purplish tints, and creates
a purple cast in the shadows of the blue robe as well. Skin tones are
a little warmer than I'd like, but still more natural and appealing than
the paler tones of the Auto setting. Resolution is very high, as the embroidery
on the blue robe and red vest show a lot of fine detail. (The original
data file for this poster was only 20MB though, so cameras like the W1
are definitely capable of showing more detail than the poster has in it.)
|
|
Macro Shot
|
Standard Macro Shot |
 |
|
Macro with Flash |
 |
A small macro area with good detail. Flash is blocked by the lens.
The W1 performed well in the macro category, capturing a minimum area
of 2.31 x 1.74 inches (59 x 44 millimeters). Resolution is high, showing
a lot of fine detail in the dollar bill, coins, and brooch (though the
coins and brooch are soft due to the close range and limited depth of
field). Corner softness is present in all four corners of the frame. The
W1's flash
almost throttles down for the macro area, but is blocked by the lens in
the lower portion of the frame.
|
|
"Davebox"
Test Target
|
Auto White Balance |
 |
|
Daylight White Balance |
 |
Good overall exposure, though a warm color cast.
The W1's Auto
and Daylight
white balance settings both produced warm images, though the Daylight
setting resulted in the strongest cast. Exposure is about right, and the
W1 distinguishes the subtle tonal variations of the Q60 target well. Though
slightly warm, colors are nearly accurate in the large color blocks, with
good saturation. That said, the additive primary colors (red, green, and
blue) are a tad oversaturated. The shadow area of the charcoal briquettes
has moderate detail, with low noise. Here are sample images with the W1's
Black and White
and Sepia
color modes.
ISO Series:
Contrast Series:
Saturation Series:
|
|
Low-Light Tests
Excellent low-light performance with great color, exposure, and focusing
in the darkest light levels.
The W1 produced clear, bright, usable images down to the 1/16 foot-candle
(0.67 lux) limit of my test, with good color at all three ISO settings.
The W1 does an excellent job controlling image noise here, as even at
ISO 400, noise is only moderate. Great performance! The table below shows
the best exposure I was able to obtain for each of a range of illumination
levels. Images in this table (like all sample photos) are untouched, exactly
as they came from the camera.
(Note: If you'd like to use a light meter
to check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting,
a light level of one foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two
seconds at f/2.8 and ISO 100.)
| |
1 fc
11 lux |
1/2 fc
5.5 lux |
1/4 fc
2.7 lux |
1/8 fc
1.3 lux |
1/16 fc
0.67 lux |
ISO
100 |

2.5 sec
f2.8 |

5 sec
f2.8 |

10 sec
f2.8 |

20 sec
f2.8 |

30 sec
f2.8 |
ISO
200 |

1.3 sec
f2.8 |

2.5 sec
f2.8 |

7 sec
f2.8 |

10 sec
f2.8 |

20 sec
f2.8 |
ISO
400 |

1/1 sec
f2.8 |

1.6 sec
f2.8 |

3 sec
f2.8 |

7 sec
f2.8 |

10 sec
f2.8 |
|
|
Flash Range Test
A fairly powerful flash, with some falloff at the 14 foot limit of
our test.
In my testing, the W1's flash illuminated the test target all the way
out to 14 feet, but with decreased intensity. Flash power remained consistent
to about nine or 10 feet, and decreased slightly with each additional
foot. Below is the flash range series, with distances from eight to 14
feet from the target.
| 8 ft |
9 ft |
10 ft |
11 ft |
12 ft |
13 ft |
14 ft |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |

1/50 sec
f5.2
ISO 100 |
|
|
ISO-12233
(WG-18) Resolution Test
Very high resolution, 1,300 lines of "strong detail." Average
barrel distortion, but very low pincushion.
The W1 performed well on the "laboratory" resolution test chart.
It started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions as low
as 1,000 lines per picture height vertically, but closer to around 800
lines horizontally. I found "strong detail" out to about 1,300
lines. "Extinction" of the target patterns didn't occur until
about 1,600 lines.
Optical distortion on the W1 is about average at the wide-angle end,
where I measured an approximate 0.8 percent barrel distortion. The telephoto
end fared much better, as I measured a 0.04 percent pincushion distortion
(about one pixel). Chromatic aberration is high, showing about six or
seven pixels of coloration on either side of the target lines. (This distortion
is visible as a very slight colored fringe around the objects at the edges
of the field of view on the resolution target.) Corner softness was moderate
in a few shots, and could be exaggerating the amount of chromatic aberration
as well.
Resolution Series, Wide Angle
Resolution Test, Telephoto
Sharpness Series
|
Viewfinder Accuracy/Flash Uniformity
A tight optical viewfinder, but nearly accurate LCD monitor.
The W1's optical viewfinder is a little tight, showing about 82 percent
frame accuracy at wide angle, and about 86 percent at telephoto. The
LCD monitor proved to be a little loose, showing more than what made
it into the final frame. Still, frame accuracy was near 100 percent.
Given that I like LCD monitors to be as close to 100 percent accuracy
as possible, the W1's LCD monitor has only a small amount of room for
improvement. Flash distribution is uneven at wide angle, with falloff
in the corners and at the edges of the frame. At telephoto, flash distribution
is more even, though with very slight falloff at the corners.
|
|
|
|

Free Photo Lessons
|
|