Solid alloy body with true twin-dial design; Smaller, lighter, and cheaper than most direct competitors; Excellent image quality, even when compared to interchangeable-lens cameras; Numerous accessories expand upon its capabilities.
Fixed prime lens is not for everybody; Ergonomics could be better; Performance is spotty; Built-in flash is rather weak; Battery life is quite modest.
Significantly sharper, more detailed JPEG images than those from the RX1; JPEG processing appears to minimize moire and aliasing artifacts; Same price as the RX1; Full-frame, 24-megapixel compact camera with fast Carl Zeiss Sonnar 35mm f/2 T* lens; Blazing fast autofocus; Impressive image quality that rivals (and sometimes surpasses) full-frame DSLRs.
More prone to moire, aliasing and false color than the RX1; Only subtle improvement in sharpness in RAW files; Fixed-length lens limits shooting flexibility; Viewfinders (optical or electronic) only available as optional accessories; Extremely expensive for a compact camera.
This is our newly designed camera comparison feature!
Would you like to take a quick tour?
Here are a few features that give an at-a-glance view of the cameras.
Purchasing cameras (or any other products) through our trusted retailers helps support this content!
These are what we think are the key advantages of each camera over the other.
What you see here is an excerpt of the pros and cons for these cameras from our reviews.
You can click to see the review page for each camera, or ask us to review them if we haven’t already
Here are some other competitors that you might be interested in.
This is a brief summary of the comparison.
Click to view the full analysis!
Click on a camera name or manufacturer to choose a different camera to compare.