Nikon D700 Review – Test Shots

Still Life

This is our new “Still Life” test target. We’re combining
some of the elements from previous shots (DaveBox and Res Chart) into
this and the “Multi Target” shot below, plus added a number
of elements that are very revealing of various camera characteristics
and foibles.

Here’s what to look for in this target:

• Tone-on-tone detail & noise suppression:
  The cloth swatches in the pinwheel were chosen because they show a lot
  of tone-on-tone detail, across a broad range of colors. This is just
  the sort of detail that noise suppression processing tends to flatten
  out. If you look at the detail in these swatches as the ISO increases,
  you’ll see just where different cameras start to lose subtle detail.
  — The white and tan swatches and the dark swatches tend to be particularly
  revealing of this. The label of the vinegar bottle (second from the
  right) is another great place to look for lost detail from noise suppression,
  as the image of the person at the top of the label is actually a depiction
  of a mosaic. The dark colors in the background and in the figure’s clothes
  contain detail that’s very quickly lost when a camera’s noise suppression
  system kicks in. Cameras with really high-quality, low-noise sensors
  that require little noise suppression will be able to hold onto the
  detail in these areas, many others will show only a uniform swath of
  smudged color.

  Another place where you’ll quickly see the effects of over-aggressive
  noise suppression is in the white salt grains of the salt grinder in
  lower left. Cameras are often more conservative about suppressing noise
  in highlight areas (because our eyes tend to see less of it there),
  but many cameras seem to have a hard time holding onto the subtle shadings
  that distinguish the salt grains from each other, particularly at higher
  ISO levels.

• Fine Detail: You’ll find a lot of fine detail
  in the label of the beer bottle on the right, in its fine cursive text,
  but the other bottle labels hold a lot of fine detail as well. Fine
  text is often a good visual indicator of resolution, because our brains
  have an excellent idea of what the text should look like, so
  are very quick to notice even minor loss of detail.

  For really fine detail, look to the circular scale/calculator on the
  right side of the scene. Some of the fine lines there are extremely
  fine indeed. Looking at results from many different cameras with this
  target, we found that camera noise-suppression systems often confuse
  the fine lines with image noise, and so flatten them out. There’s also
  a nice range of fine text sizes in this chart as well, once again great
  visual cues for resolution and detail.

• Highlight Detail: Three elements in this scene
  show off (or show up) a camera’s ability to hold onto highlight detail.
  As mentioned above, the salt grains (and reflections of the studio lights)
  in the salt mill are examples of fairly subtle highlight detail that
  cameras’ anti-noise processing sometimes obliterate. The folded white
  cloth under the mug on the right side of the frame likewise shows a
  lot of white-on-white detail that is easy to lose, particularly if a
  camera’s tone curve is too contrasty. As it turns out though, the most
  sensitive test of a camera’s highlight abilities seems to be the hank
  of white embroidery thread in the upper right corner. These fibers are
  unusually bright and reflective, so its easy for a camera to blow out
  detail in them.

• Shadow Detail: Several elements of this subject
  are useful for evaluating shadow detail, particularly the black mug
  and the pieces of folded black velvet, both under and inside the mug.
  The bottoms of the beer bottles also provide some gradations of deep
  shadow, and the clump of peppers in the bottom of the pepper oil bottle
  had a fair bit of detail that’s far down at the shadow end of the tone
  curve.

  We were actually surprised when we constructed this scene just how dark
  the velvet and sides of the beer bottles ended up being. Even with the
  bright studio lights shining directly on it, the velvet in particular
  stays way, way down at the shadow end of the tone curve. With most cameras
  and on most monitors, the velvet will simply appear as an unrelieved
  swatch of black. To see whether it contains deep detail or not, in most
  cases you’ll have to open the file in an image editor and boost the
  brightness dramatically, to bring the detail up into a visible range.

• Preservation of “Shape” in Strong Colors:
  As you approach the extremes of a camera’s color gamut (its range of
  recordable colors), it becomes more and more difficult for the camera
  to show fine gradations of tone, because one or more of the RGB color
  channels are close to saturation. It’s not uncommon to see a brightly
  colored piece of clothing or a vibrant flower appear in digicam photos
  as just a blob of color, because the camera ran up against the limits
  of its color gamut. The brightly colored embroidery threads in the upper
  right portion of the Still Life target are good examples of situations
  where this might happen. Pay particular attention to the bright red
  and dark blue colors here, as these are both colors near the edge of
  the typical sRGB color gamut.

• Color accuracy and white balance: It’s pretty
  small in there, but we’ve included a mini-MacBeth chart, which displays
  very carefully controlled color swatches. Our Multi Target (see below)
  sports a full-sized MacBeth chart, but the one here serves as a good
  check of color balance and rendition, and is also useful for checking
  white balance on this particular shot.

• Image noise and detail vs ISO: As mentioned above,
  this target contains many elements useful for evaluating detail loss
  to anti-noise processing. We’ll therefore always shoot a full set of
  test images of this target across each camera’s ISO range, for every
  camera we test. (See below.)

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Saturation Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Color Series
Standard	Vivid	Neutral	Black & White	sRGB	Adobe

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Multi Target

Our new “Multi Target” is actually an interim design that
we plan to replace with a modified version within the next few months.
(By the end of summer, 2006.) In its current form, its just an ISO-12233
res chart with several other elements attached to it, covering portions
of the target we don’t generally use in our reviews. (We’ll continue shooting
the full res chart in SLR reviews for the sake of interested readers,
but all lesser cameras will now show just the Multi-Target instead.) The
added elements largely mirror ones that were present in our “DaveBox”
test target, which we’ve now semi-retired. Here’s some of what you’ll
find in this target:

Res chart elements: In placing the new elements on the ISO
target, we were careful to leave the highest-frequency hyperbolic resolution
wedges (the sets of fine lines that fan out vertically and horizontally),
since these are what most people look at on the ISO chart to judge camera
resolution from. There are also enough of the slanted black parallelograms
available to use them to measure a camera’s Spatial Frequency Response
characteristics with Imatest.

Gray Scale: While reflective gray scales don’t cover the full
dynamic range of higher-end cameras, advanced readers may be interested
in using the gray scale here to evaluate noise performance vs brightness
level, and/or examine the shape of a camera’s tone curve.

MacBeth Chart: This is about as common a color standard as
you can get these days, very widely available for only mildly exorbitant
cost, and quite well controlled in its production. It thus serves as a
good basis of comparison between cameras and between test setups. Imatest
also understands the MacBeth colors very well, and uses them to produce
its color accuracy map that we feature in all our reviews.

Kodak Color Separation Target: We include this for reference
because it’s used by other reviewers out there, but caution our readers
that it really isn’t well-suited for use as an absolute color standard.
As its name suggests, its actual intended purpose is as an aid in setting
exposure levels for old-style film-based color separation, using panchromatic
graphic arts film, RGB filters, and halftone screens. It’s ideal for that
usage, but the colors aren’t well-controlled enough and are too subject
to fading for it to be usable as a true reference standard for color accuracy.

Kodak Q60 target: This is another target that’s perhaps not
well enough controlled for quantitative measurements between cameras,
but one that does have several useful characteristics nonetheless. For
instance, it provides a good reference for the handling of various colors
representative of common skin tones (the tan and brown patches along its
right side), as well as of lighter, less-saturated tints of both additive
and subtractive primaries (red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, and yellow).
The MacBeth chart’s colors lean heavily toward highly saturated values,
and there aren’t any pastel tones present at all. In the past, we’ve found
that cameras with contrasty tone curves sometimes have trouble with the
pastel tones in the Q60 target, making it a valuable reference that we’ll
continue to include.

Resolution Series:

See the full sharpness series, files /cameras/nikon-d700-review/image/745745?section=samples through /cameras/nikon-d700-review/image/745724?section=samples
on the thumbnail index page.

“Sunlit” Portrait:
(This is our “Outdoor” Portrait test – read more about it
here.)

The lighting in this shot is deliberately awful, about what you’d expect
from noontime sunshine here in the Atlanta, GA area. (In fact, the color
balance has been chosen to pretty well match the hazy sunshine here in
mid-August.)

The reason for the harsh lighting is to provide a real “torture
test” of how cameras handle conditions of extreme contrast; and in
particular, how well they do holding onto highlight detail.

Look for:

• Overall color: Matching summer sunlight here in the South,
  the lighting in this scene is a bit more yellow-tinged than that in
  many parts of the country, or in the fall or winter. – So there may
  be an overall warm cast to the color. That said though, there’s a fair
  range of color represented in the bouquet, presenting a tough challenge
  for the cameras. For some reason, the blue flowers seem particularly
  hard to handle, with many cameras rendering them as purple. (In real
  life, they’re a light shade of navy blue, with just a bit of purple
  in them.)
• Skin tones: The overall slight warm cast will tend to leave
  the model’s skin tones a bit on the warm side as well. Nonetheless,
  look to see if her skin seems overly pink or if they have a too-bright
  tinge of yellow: Some cameras oversaturate skin tones (make their color
  too intense), leading to an almost sunburned look. A little oversaturation
  can make for a more “healthy-looking” complexion, but it doesn’t
  take much variation for skin tones to look unnatural.
• Highlight detail: When the model’s skin tones are at a more
  or less normal level of brightness, how much detail can you see in her
  shirt? Does it blow out entirely to white, or can you still see the
  creases and folds in the fabric?
• Overall contrast: Most consumer digital cameras produce bright,
  contrasty images, because that’s what most consumers like. Unfortunately,
  under bright sunlit conditions, many such cameras produce images with
  little or no highlight detail, and dark, plugged-up looking shadows.
• Shadow detail: The area under the flower bouquet is in quite
  deep shadow. Does the camera in question retain good detail here, with
  low image noise? To see, you may need to download the image and play
  with it in Photoshop(tm) or another imaging program. Brighten the image,
  and see how far detail extends into the shadows. Photo printers are
  generally much better at showing shadow detail than are CRTs, so you’ll
  want a camera that preserves good detail here. The ability to boost
  brightness without encountering too much image noise is important if
  you ever have to “rescue” an underexposed image on the computer.
• Detail in areas of subtle contrast: Most digital cameras employ
  some sort of noise-suppression to remove electronic noise from their
  images. Noise suppression is a good thing, but only if it’s not overdone.
  Too much noise suppression will “flatten out” subtle detail
  in areas of reduced contrast. You can often see this in hair, where
  the individual strands become blurred, and the image takes on an almost
  watercolor effect. Look at the detail in the model’s hair, and compare
  how it looks with different cameras in the Comparometer.

To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 EV to +0.7 EV, see files
D700OUTBMM1.HTM through D700OUTBMP2.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Saturation Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Normal Flash +0.3 EV

Slow-Sync Flash +0.3 EV

This shot duplicates indoor shooting conditions in most US homes, with
fairly bright incandescent room lighting. The challenge here is for the
camera’s flash to blend naturally with the room lighting, and produce
good, neutral color overall. – Some cameras will be overly affected by
the room lighting, even with their flash enabled, and the result will
be a strong orange cast. Another common failing is for the highlights
from the flash to take on an unnatural bluish cast.

Finally, exposure is important here, and frequently a tough challenge
for the cameras. The model’s white shirt is central in the scene, reflecting
a lot of the light from the flash right back at the camera. As a result,
most cameras underexpose this shot, and require some positive exposure
compensation to produce a good result. – And that’s an important consideration
in itself: Does the camera even permit adjustment of its flash
exposures? Many do not. These photos are a tough exposure challenge, if
they come out OK, the camera in question can probably be coaxed into delivering
a good flash exposure of any subject within its range.

Note too, that the normal flash shot (as opposed to the slow sync one,
if the camera offers that feature) will be sharply rendered, any subject
or camera movement frozen by the quick pop of the flash. That makes this
shot a good one to look for the effect of over-aggressive noise suppression
in the model’s hair.

To view the exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV in the normal flash
mode, see files D700INBFP0.HTM through D700INBFP3.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

To view the same series in the Slow-Sync flash mode, see files D700INBFSP0.HTM
through D700INBFSP3.HTM on the thumbnail index
page.

Auto White Balance

Incandescent White Balance

Manual White Balance

2,600K White Balance

The incandescent lighting used in most US homes actually has a very
strong yellow color to it. Our eyes have an amazing ability to ignore
color casts like this, something digital cameras struggle to emulate.

The incandescent lighting used for this shot is thus not only very common
here in the US, but also very difficult for most digital cameras to deal
with. While we probably want a little yellow color to remain in
the image (to convey some of the mood of the original scene), too much
will look unnatural and distort colors.

Most cameras’ auto white balance systems have a great deal of difficulty
with this shot, but many incandescent white balance settings struggle
as well. (It seems that many cameras’ incandescent settings are actually
calibrated to the tungsten lighting used in professional studio systems,
which isn’t nearly as warm-toned as typical household lighting.)

If you intend to do much shooting indoors after dark, pay careful attention
to this test, as cameras vary widely in this regard.

To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 EV to +0.7 EV, see files
D700INBMM2.HTM through D700INBMP2.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

ISO Series:
“ISO equivalent” refers to a camera’s light sensitivity. ISO
200 represents twice the sensitivity of ISO 100, meaning that you can
use a shutter speed that’s twice as fast. Higher ISO settings are often
required to get any picture at all when shooting after dark, but even
in full daylight, using a higher ISO can help you freeze fast action.
The problem is, increasing a digital camera’s ISO also increases image
noise. In practical terms, this means that higher-ISO images often can’t
be used to produce prints as large as lower-ISO ones. The tricky thing
here is that high-ISO images often look much different when printed at
various sizes than they do when viewed on-screen. In particular, for any
level of image noise, you’ll often find that while noise is quite evident
at larger print sizes, as you reduce the size of the prints, there will
come a point where it suddenly ceases to be an issue. We routinely print
high-ISO photos from the cameras we test on our studio printer (currently
a Canon i9900) at a range of sizes, and report our findings. If you’re
interested in investigating the effect of image noise for yourself, don’t
judge cameras’ performance by how their images look on your CRT, viewed
pixel-for-pixel. Rather, download the test shots linked in the table below
and output them on your own printer, so you can see how prints of various
sizes will actually look.

One additional note about this particular test series though: Because
these images are shot under household incandescent lighting, the camera
has to boost its blue-channel signal quite a bit to get back to a neutral
color balance. Since the blue channel is generally the one with the most
noise, this makes this shot a real acid test of noise performance. Noise
levels in high-ISO shots taken under daylight conditions usually won’t
show as much noise. (See the “Far Field” test for examples of
high ISO shots captured in daylight.)

Like several of our tests, these images are actually photos of a high-resolution
poster, shot under studio lighting. As of this writing, the poster in
question was produced from a high-resolution scan of a 4×5-inch transparency,
scanned to a resolution of about 150 megapixels. Even at that, it’s starting
to show its age, as the combination of camera lens, film emulsion and
scanner resolution mean that many of the current 5+ megapixel cameras
come close to capturing all the detail that’s present. (We have a new
poster under production, produced from 45 separate digital images, “stitched”
into a single 400+ megapixel image, that should comfortably outpace the
resolution of portable digital cameras for years to come.)

Why did we choose to shoot a picture of a picture? The idea was to show
a typical subject (a house and surrounding foliage) in a way that would
be absolutely consistent from camera to camera. Any outdoor subject
is going to vary considerably from day to day, as the lighting changes
with the weather, atmospheric conditions, and season. Shooting a poster
lets us compare images from cameras shot weeks, months, or even years
apart, with the sure knowledge that nothing has changed from one shot
to another.

Things to look for here are fine detail, as seen in the foliage and
tree limbs against the sky, sharpness in the corners, and the preservation
of subtle detail in the shaded brick patterns. – Many cameras with overactive
noise suppression severely blur the brick patterns that are in shadow.

Far-Field Test

While the House poster in the shot above provides absolute repeatability
from test to test, it doesn’t offer the range of brightness (dynamic range)
that the original scene had, nor does it contain the nearly infinite range
of fine detail found in nature. For these reasons, we still shoot the
original house, even though the vagaries of nature mean that no two shots
will ever be directly comparable. (In fact, over the eight or so years
since we first shot this subject, the trees in front of the house have
now grown so large that they obscure much of the subject. – We’re unfortunately
going to have to switch to a different subject in the near future.)

Things to look for here are how well the camera handles the range of
light levels from very bright to quite dark, and how well it renders the
very fine detail visible in various parts of the image.

Note though, that because this is shot outdoors, the character of the
light is unavoidably going to change quite a bit, depending on the atmospheric
humidity and the time of year. – You thus shouldn’t rely on it for absolute
comparisons between cameras, since it’s unlikely that conditions will
be identical from one test to the next.

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Lens Zoom Range

Because the Nikon D700 accepts a wide range of Nikkor lenses, performance
here will depend on the lens in use.

Because most of its various elements
are now contained or represented in the combination of the Still Life
and Multi Target shots, we no longer routinely shoot the Davebox by itself,
as would normally appear in this space. (We do however, still use it for
our flash range and low light tests below.)

As with the Zoom series above, performance here depends on the lens
in use.

Low-Light Tests

Low light photography is an area where there are really enormous differences
between digital camera models. This test starts at a light level about
equivalent to typical city street lighting at night (one foot-candle),
and then progresses down from there, each successive test being at half
the light level of the preceding one. You may also see the effect of poor
low-light autofocus in some of these shots, although we use a different
test setup to check autofocus performance more directly. (The results
of which are reported on in the main Test Results section.) Things to
look for here include:

• Exposure limit: What’s the darkest level a camera can handle
  at each ISO setting? If the leftmost images are reasonably bright, the
  camera should do fine with typical city night scenes. If you’re shooting
  in the more dimly-lit suburbs, you’ll need a camera capable of producing
  good images one, two, or three steps to the right of that.
• Autofocus Limit: How dark can you shoot and still get well-focused
  pictures?
• White Balance: Does the camera’s white balance suffer at low
  light levels? (Many do.)
• Noise Levels: Look at the photos, print them on your own photo
  printer. How large a print can you make at acceptable quality levels,
  at various ISO settings and light levels?
• Detail loss to anti-noise processing?: Do details in the white
  gauze and even in the lettering on the test targets suffer at lower
  light levels?

(Note: If you’d like to use a light meter to check light levels
for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a light level of one
foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two seconds at f/2.8 and
ISO 100.)

	1 fc 11 lux	1/2 fc 5.5 lux	1/4 fc 2.7 lux	1/8 fc 1.3 lux	1/16 fc 0.67 lux	1/16fc No NR
ISO 100	0.8 sec f2.8	1.6 sec f2.8	4 sec f2.8	8 sec f2.8	15 sec f2.8	15 sec f2.8
ISO 200	0.4 sec f2.8	1 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	3 sec f2.8	10 sec f2.8	8 sec f2.8
ISO 400	1/5 sec f2.8	0.5 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	5 sec f2.8	5 sec f2.8
ISO 800	1/10 sec f2.8	1/5 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	2 sec f2.8
ISO 1600	1/20 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.5 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8
ISO 3200	1/30 sec f2.8	1/20 sec f2.8	1/6 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8
ISO 6400	1/80 sec f2.8	1/30 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8	1/6 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8
ISO 12800	1/160 s f2.8	1/60 sec f2.8	1/25 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8
ISO 25600	1/320 s f2.8	1/125 s f2.8	1/60 sec f2.8	1/25 sec f2.8	1/13 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8

Flash Range Test

Digital camera makers have gotten better with their flash-range ratings.
In the early days, many cameras had rather “optimistic” flash
range specs, to put it politely. These days, the manufacturers seem to
be toeing the line. (No doubt at least in part because of tests like this.)
Consistent with our philosophy of testing worst-case conditions, this
test also involves some use of each camera’s zoom lens. Flash range is
greater at wide angle focal lengths than at telephoto ones. If you’re
shooting at the wide angle end of the lens’ range, you might get better
flash range than what’s shown here. – But you’ll never get a nasty surprise
if you let the test shots below be your guide to flash capability.

Manufacturer-Specified Flash Range
105mm, f/2.8
20 feet ISO 200

Resolution Target

Because the critical elements of this target now appear as part of the
Multi Target above, we no longer shoot standalone images of the Resolution
Target.

Viewfinder Accuracy/Flash Uniformity

Viewfinder accuracy is an important parameter, especially for shots
where framing is critical. The optical viewfinders on most digital cameras
match the (poor) accuracy of those on film cameras, typically showing
only about 85% of the actual final frame area. It’s likely that this is
a deliberate design choice by the camera engineers, to help avoid users
accidentally cutting off the heads of their subjects. We disagree with
this approach, or at least feel that it should be mitigated a bit, perhaps
by increasing the accuracy to 90 to 95%.

Unlike the optical viewfinders, the LCD viewfinders on most digital
cameras tend to be quite accurate. There are exceptions though, and it’s
unfortunately not uncommon to find an LCD monitor that only shows 90%
or less of the final frame.

Things to look for on this test chart are:

• Optical and LCD viewfinder accuracy: When we shoot this target
  in the studio, we line things up so the bold black outline on the target
  is just visible at the edges of the viewfinder frame. The resulting
  photo then very directly shows how accurate the viewfinder is.
• Flash Uniformity: The flash units on many digital cameras don’t
  illuminate the scene very evenly, especially at wide angle focal lengths.
  We also shoot the viewfinder target with the flash enabled, so the last
  photo here shows how uniform the flash is.

Optical Viewfinder

LCD Monitor

Flash

Still Life

This is our new “Still Life” test target. We’re combining
some of the elements from previous shots (DaveBox and Res Chart) into
this and the “Multi Target” shot below, plus added a number
of elements that are very revealing of various camera characteristics
and foibles.

Here’s what to look for in this target:

• Tone-on-tone detail & noise suppression:
  The cloth swatches in the pinwheel were chosen because they show a lot
  of tone-on-tone detail, across a broad range of colors. This is just
  the sort of detail that noise suppression processing tends to flatten
  out. If you look at the detail in these swatches as the ISO increases,
  you’ll see just where different cameras start to lose subtle detail.
  — The white and tan swatches and the dark swatches tend to be particularly
  revealing of this. The label of the vinegar bottle (second from the
  right) is another great place to look for lost detail from noise suppression,
  as the image of the person at the top of the label is actually a depiction
  of a mosaic. The dark colors in the background and in the figure’s clothes
  contain detail that’s very quickly lost when a camera’s noise suppression
  system kicks in. Cameras with really high-quality, low-noise sensors
  that require little noise suppression will be able to hold onto the
  detail in these areas, many others will show only a uniform swath of
  smudged color.

  Another place where you’ll quickly see the effects of over-aggressive
  noise suppression is in the white salt grains of the salt grinder in
  lower left. Cameras are often more conservative about suppressing noise
  in highlight areas (because our eyes tend to see less of it there),
  but many cameras seem to have a hard time holding onto the subtle shadings
  that distinguish the salt grains from each other, particularly at higher
  ISO levels.

• Fine Detail: You’ll find a lot of fine detail
  in the label of the beer bottle on the right, in its fine cursive text,
  but the other bottle labels hold a lot of fine detail as well. Fine
  text is often a good visual indicator of resolution, because our brains
  have an excellent idea of what the text should look like, so
  are very quick to notice even minor loss of detail.

  For really fine detail, look to the circular scale/calculator on the
  right side of the scene. Some of the fine lines there are extremely
  fine indeed. Looking at results from many different cameras with this
  target, we found that camera noise-suppression systems often confuse
  the fine lines with image noise, and so flatten them out. There’s also
  a nice range of fine text sizes in this chart as well, once again great
  visual cues for resolution and detail.

• Highlight Detail: Three elements in this scene
  show off (or show up) a camera’s ability to hold onto highlight detail.
  As mentioned above, the salt grains (and reflections of the studio lights)
  in the salt mill are examples of fairly subtle highlight detail that
  cameras’ anti-noise processing sometimes obliterate. The folded white
  cloth under the mug on the right side of the frame likewise shows a
  lot of white-on-white detail that is easy to lose, particularly if a
  camera’s tone curve is too contrasty. As it turns out though, the most
  sensitive test of a camera’s highlight abilities seems to be the hank
  of white embroidery thread in the upper right corner. These fibers are
  unusually bright and reflective, so its easy for a camera to blow out
  detail in them.

• Shadow Detail: Several elements of this subject
  are useful for evaluating shadow detail, particularly the black mug
  and the pieces of folded black velvet, both under and inside the mug.
  The bottoms of the beer bottles also provide some gradations of deep
  shadow, and the clump of peppers in the bottom of the pepper oil bottle
  had a fair bit of detail that’s far down at the shadow end of the tone
  curve.

  We were actually surprised when we constructed this scene just how dark
  the velvet and sides of the beer bottles ended up being. Even with the
  bright studio lights shining directly on it, the velvet in particular
  stays way, way down at the shadow end of the tone curve. With most cameras
  and on most monitors, the velvet will simply appear as an unrelieved
  swatch of black. To see whether it contains deep detail or not, in most
  cases you’ll have to open the file in an image editor and boost the
  brightness dramatically, to bring the detail up into a visible range.

• Preservation of “Shape” in Strong Colors:
  As you approach the extremes of a camera’s color gamut (its range of
  recordable colors), it becomes more and more difficult for the camera
  to show fine gradations of tone, because one or more of the RGB color
  channels are close to saturation. It’s not uncommon to see a brightly
  colored piece of clothing or a vibrant flower appear in digicam photos
  as just a blob of color, because the camera ran up against the limits
  of its color gamut. The brightly colored embroidery threads in the upper
  right portion of the Still Life target are good examples of situations
  where this might happen. Pay particular attention to the bright red
  and dark blue colors here, as these are both colors near the edge of
  the typical sRGB color gamut.

• Color accuracy and white balance: It’s pretty
  small in there, but we’ve included a mini-MacBeth chart, which displays
  very carefully controlled color swatches. Our Multi Target (see below)
  sports a full-sized MacBeth chart, but the one here serves as a good
  check of color balance and rendition, and is also useful for checking
  white balance on this particular shot.

• Image noise and detail vs ISO: As mentioned above,
  this target contains many elements useful for evaluating detail loss
  to anti-noise processing. We’ll therefore always shoot a full set of
  test images of this target across each camera’s ISO range, for every
  camera we test. (See below.)

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Saturation Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Color Series
Standard	Vivid	Neutral	Black & White	sRGB	Adobe

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Multi Target

Our new “Multi Target” is actually an interim design that
we plan to replace with a modified version within the next few months.
(By the end of summer, 2006.) In its current form, its just an ISO-12233
res chart with several other elements attached to it, covering portions
of the target we don’t generally use in our reviews. (We’ll continue shooting
the full res chart in SLR reviews for the sake of interested readers,
but all lesser cameras will now show just the Multi-Target instead.) The
added elements largely mirror ones that were present in our “DaveBox”
test target, which we’ve now semi-retired. Here’s some of what you’ll
find in this target:

Res chart elements: In placing the new elements on the ISO
target, we were careful to leave the highest-frequency hyperbolic resolution
wedges (the sets of fine lines that fan out vertically and horizontally),
since these are what most people look at on the ISO chart to judge camera
resolution from. There are also enough of the slanted black parallelograms
available to use them to measure a camera’s Spatial Frequency Response
characteristics with Imatest.

Gray Scale: While reflective gray scales don’t cover the full
dynamic range of higher-end cameras, advanced readers may be interested
in using the gray scale here to evaluate noise performance vs brightness
level, and/or examine the shape of a camera’s tone curve.

MacBeth Chart: This is about as common a color standard as
you can get these days, very widely available for only mildly exorbitant
cost, and quite well controlled in its production. It thus serves as a
good basis of comparison between cameras and between test setups. Imatest
also understands the MacBeth colors very well, and uses them to produce
its color accuracy map that we feature in all our reviews.

Kodak Color Separation Target: We include this for reference
because it’s used by other reviewers out there, but caution our readers
that it really isn’t well-suited for use as an absolute color standard.
As its name suggests, its actual intended purpose is as an aid in setting
exposure levels for old-style film-based color separation, using panchromatic
graphic arts film, RGB filters, and halftone screens. It’s ideal for that
usage, but the colors aren’t well-controlled enough and are too subject
to fading for it to be usable as a true reference standard for color accuracy.

Kodak Q60 target: This is another target that’s perhaps not
well enough controlled for quantitative measurements between cameras,
but one that does have several useful characteristics nonetheless. For
instance, it provides a good reference for the handling of various colors
representative of common skin tones (the tan and brown patches along its
right side), as well as of lighter, less-saturated tints of both additive
and subtractive primaries (red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, and yellow).
The MacBeth chart’s colors lean heavily toward highly saturated values,
and there aren’t any pastel tones present at all. In the past, we’ve found
that cameras with contrasty tone curves sometimes have trouble with the
pastel tones in the Q60 target, making it a valuable reference that we’ll
continue to include.

Resolution Series:

See the full sharpness series, files /cameras/nikon-d700-review/image/745745?section=test through /cameras/nikon-d700-review/image/745724?section=test
on the thumbnail index page.

“Sunlit” Portrait:
(This is our “Outdoor” Portrait test – read more about it
here.)

The lighting in this shot is deliberately awful, about what you’d expect
from noontime sunshine here in the Atlanta, GA area. (In fact, the color
balance has been chosen to pretty well match the hazy sunshine here in
mid-August.)

The reason for the harsh lighting is to provide a real “torture
test” of how cameras handle conditions of extreme contrast; and in
particular, how well they do holding onto highlight detail.

Look for:

• Overall color: Matching summer sunlight here in the South,
  the lighting in this scene is a bit more yellow-tinged than that in
  many parts of the country, or in the fall or winter. – So there may
  be an overall warm cast to the color. That said though, there’s a fair
  range of color represented in the bouquet, presenting a tough challenge
  for the cameras. For some reason, the blue flowers seem particularly
  hard to handle, with many cameras rendering them as purple. (In real
  life, they’re a light shade of navy blue, with just a bit of purple
  in them.)
• Skin tones: The overall slight warm cast will tend to leave
  the model’s skin tones a bit on the warm side as well. Nonetheless,
  look to see if her skin seems overly pink or if they have a too-bright
  tinge of yellow: Some cameras oversaturate skin tones (make their color
  too intense), leading to an almost sunburned look. A little oversaturation
  can make for a more “healthy-looking” complexion, but it doesn’t
  take much variation for skin tones to look unnatural.
• Highlight detail: When the model’s skin tones are at a more
  or less normal level of brightness, how much detail can you see in her
  shirt? Does it blow out entirely to white, or can you still see the
  creases and folds in the fabric?
• Overall contrast: Most consumer digital cameras produce bright,
  contrasty images, because that’s what most consumers like. Unfortunately,
  under bright sunlit conditions, many such cameras produce images with
  little or no highlight detail, and dark, plugged-up looking shadows.
• Shadow detail: The area under the flower bouquet is in quite
  deep shadow. Does the camera in question retain good detail here, with
  low image noise? To see, you may need to download the image and play
  with it in Photoshop(tm) or another imaging program. Brighten the image,
  and see how far detail extends into the shadows. Photo printers are
  generally much better at showing shadow detail than are CRTs, so you’ll
  want a camera that preserves good detail here. The ability to boost
  brightness without encountering too much image noise is important if
  you ever have to “rescue” an underexposed image on the computer.
• Detail in areas of subtle contrast: Most digital cameras employ
  some sort of noise-suppression to remove electronic noise from their
  images. Noise suppression is a good thing, but only if it’s not overdone.
  Too much noise suppression will “flatten out” subtle detail
  in areas of reduced contrast. You can often see this in hair, where
  the individual strands become blurred, and the image takes on an almost
  watercolor effect. Look at the detail in the model’s hair, and compare
  how it looks with different cameras in the Comparometer.

To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 EV to +0.7 EV, see files
D700OUTBMM1.HTM through D700OUTBMP2.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

Saturation Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Normal Flash +0.3 EV

Slow-Sync Flash +0.3 EV

This shot duplicates indoor shooting conditions in most US homes, with
fairly bright incandescent room lighting. The challenge here is for the
camera’s flash to blend naturally with the room lighting, and produce
good, neutral color overall. – Some cameras will be overly affected by
the room lighting, even with their flash enabled, and the result will
be a strong orange cast. Another common failing is for the highlights
from the flash to take on an unnatural bluish cast.

Finally, exposure is important here, and frequently a tough challenge
for the cameras. The model’s white shirt is central in the scene, reflecting
a lot of the light from the flash right back at the camera. As a result,
most cameras underexpose this shot, and require some positive exposure
compensation to produce a good result. – And that’s an important consideration
in itself: Does the camera even permit adjustment of its flash
exposures? Many do not. These photos are a tough exposure challenge, if
they come out OK, the camera in question can probably be coaxed into delivering
a good flash exposure of any subject within its range.

Note too, that the normal flash shot (as opposed to the slow sync one,
if the camera offers that feature) will be sharply rendered, any subject
or camera movement frozen by the quick pop of the flash. That makes this
shot a good one to look for the effect of over-aggressive noise suppression
in the model’s hair.

To view the exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV in the normal flash
mode, see files D700INBFP0.HTM through D700INBFP3.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

To view the same series in the Slow-Sync flash mode, see files D700INBFSP0.HTM
through D700INBFSP3.HTM on the thumbnail index
page.

Auto White Balance

Incandescent White Balance

Manual White Balance

2,600K White Balance

The incandescent lighting used in most US homes actually has a very
strong yellow color to it. Our eyes have an amazing ability to ignore
color casts like this, something digital cameras struggle to emulate.

The incandescent lighting used for this shot is thus not only very common
here in the US, but also very difficult for most digital cameras to deal
with. While we probably want a little yellow color to remain in
the image (to convey some of the mood of the original scene), too much
will look unnatural and distort colors.

Most cameras’ auto white balance systems have a great deal of difficulty
with this shot, but many incandescent white balance settings struggle
as well. (It seems that many cameras’ incandescent settings are actually
calibrated to the tungsten lighting used in professional studio systems,
which isn’t nearly as warm-toned as typical household lighting.)

If you intend to do much shooting indoors after dark, pay careful attention
to this test, as cameras vary widely in this regard.

To view the entire exposure series from -0.3 EV to +0.7 EV, see files
D700INBMM2.HTM through D700INBMP2.HTM on the thumbnail
index page.

ISO Series:
“ISO equivalent” refers to a camera’s light sensitivity. ISO
200 represents twice the sensitivity of ISO 100, meaning that you can
use a shutter speed that’s twice as fast. Higher ISO settings are often
required to get any picture at all when shooting after dark, but even
in full daylight, using a higher ISO can help you freeze fast action.
The problem is, increasing a digital camera’s ISO also increases image
noise. In practical terms, this means that higher-ISO images often can’t
be used to produce prints as large as lower-ISO ones. The tricky thing
here is that high-ISO images often look much different when printed at
various sizes than they do when viewed on-screen. In particular, for any
level of image noise, you’ll often find that while noise is quite evident
at larger print sizes, as you reduce the size of the prints, there will
come a point where it suddenly ceases to be an issue. We routinely print
high-ISO photos from the cameras we test on our studio printer (currently
a Canon i9900) at a range of sizes, and report our findings. If you’re
interested in investigating the effect of image noise for yourself, don’t
judge cameras’ performance by how their images look on your CRT, viewed
pixel-for-pixel. Rather, download the test shots linked in the table below
and output them on your own printer, so you can see how prints of various
sizes will actually look.

One additional note about this particular test series though: Because
these images are shot under household incandescent lighting, the camera
has to boost its blue-channel signal quite a bit to get back to a neutral
color balance. Since the blue channel is generally the one with the most
noise, this makes this shot a real acid test of noise performance. Noise
levels in high-ISO shots taken under daylight conditions usually won’t
show as much noise. (See the “Far Field” test for examples of
high ISO shots captured in daylight.)

Like several of our tests, these images are actually photos of a high-resolution
poster, shot under studio lighting. As of this writing, the poster in
question was produced from a high-resolution scan of a 4×5-inch transparency,
scanned to a resolution of about 150 megapixels. Even at that, it’s starting
to show its age, as the combination of camera lens, film emulsion and
scanner resolution mean that many of the current 5+ megapixel cameras
come close to capturing all the detail that’s present. (We have a new
poster under production, produced from 45 separate digital images, “stitched”
into a single 400+ megapixel image, that should comfortably outpace the
resolution of portable digital cameras for years to come.)

Why did we choose to shoot a picture of a picture? The idea was to show
a typical subject (a house and surrounding foliage) in a way that would
be absolutely consistent from camera to camera. Any outdoor subject
is going to vary considerably from day to day, as the lighting changes
with the weather, atmospheric conditions, and season. Shooting a poster
lets us compare images from cameras shot weeks, months, or even years
apart, with the sure knowledge that nothing has changed from one shot
to another.

Things to look for here are fine detail, as seen in the foliage and
tree limbs against the sky, sharpness in the corners, and the preservation
of subtle detail in the shaded brick patterns. – Many cameras with overactive
noise suppression severely blur the brick patterns that are in shadow.

Far-Field Test

While the House poster in the shot above provides absolute repeatability
from test to test, it doesn’t offer the range of brightness (dynamic range)
that the original scene had, nor does it contain the nearly infinite range
of fine detail found in nature. For these reasons, we still shoot the
original house, even though the vagaries of nature mean that no two shots
will ever be directly comparable. (In fact, over the eight or so years
since we first shot this subject, the trees in front of the house have
now grown so large that they obscure much of the subject. – We’re unfortunately
going to have to switch to a different subject in the near future.)

Things to look for here are how well the camera handles the range of
light levels from very bright to quite dark, and how well it renders the
very fine detail visible in various parts of the image.

Note though, that because this is shot outdoors, the character of the
light is unavoidably going to change quite a bit, depending on the atmospheric
humidity and the time of year. – You thus shouldn’t rely on it for absolute
comparisons between cameras, since it’s unlikely that conditions will
be identical from one test to the next.

Contrast Series
-5	-3	-1	Normal	+1	+3	+5

D-Lighting Series
Off	Low	Normal	High

Lens Zoom Range

Because the Nikon D700 accepts a wide range of Nikkor lenses, performance
here will depend on the lens in use.

Because most of its various elements
are now contained or represented in the combination of the Still Life
and Multi Target shots, we no longer routinely shoot the Davebox by itself,
as would normally appear in this space. (We do however, still use it for
our flash range and low light tests below.)

As with the Zoom series above, performance here depends on the lens
in use.

Low-Light Tests

Low light photography is an area where there are really enormous differences
between digital camera models. This test starts at a light level about
equivalent to typical city street lighting at night (one foot-candle),
and then progresses down from there, each successive test being at half
the light level of the preceding one. You may also see the effect of poor
low-light autofocus in some of these shots, although we use a different
test setup to check autofocus performance more directly. (The results
of which are reported on in the main Test Results section.) Things to
look for here include:

• Exposure limit: What’s the darkest level a camera can handle
  at each ISO setting? If the leftmost images are reasonably bright, the
  camera should do fine with typical city night scenes. If you’re shooting
  in the more dimly-lit suburbs, you’ll need a camera capable of producing
  good images one, two, or three steps to the right of that.
• Autofocus Limit: How dark can you shoot and still get well-focused
  pictures?
• White Balance: Does the camera’s white balance suffer at low
  light levels? (Many do.)
• Noise Levels: Look at the photos, print them on your own photo
  printer. How large a print can you make at acceptable quality levels,
  at various ISO settings and light levels?
• Detail loss to anti-noise processing?: Do details in the white
  gauze and even in the lettering on the test targets suffer at lower
  light levels?

(Note: If you’d like to use a light meter to check light levels
for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a light level of one
foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two seconds at f/2.8 and
ISO 100.)

	1 fc 11 lux	1/2 fc 5.5 lux	1/4 fc 2.7 lux	1/8 fc 1.3 lux	1/16 fc 0.67 lux	1/16fc No NR
ISO 100	0.8 sec f2.8	1.6 sec f2.8	4 sec f2.8	8 sec f2.8	15 sec f2.8	15 sec f2.8
ISO 200	0.4 sec f2.8	1 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	3 sec f2.8	10 sec f2.8	8 sec f2.8
ISO 400	1/5 sec f2.8	0.5 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	5 sec f2.8	5 sec f2.8
ISO 800	1/10 sec f2.8	1/5 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8	2.5 sec f2.8	2 sec f2.8
ISO 1600	1/20 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.5 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8	1.3 sec f2.8
ISO 3200	1/30 sec f2.8	1/20 sec f2.8	1/6 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.6 sec f2.8
ISO 6400	1/80 sec f2.8	1/30 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8	1/6 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8	0.3 sec f2.8
ISO 12800	1/160 sec f2.8	1/60 sec f2.8	1/25 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8	1/8 sec f2.8
ISO 25600	1/320 sec f2.8	1/125 sec f2.8	1/60 sec f2.8	1/25 sec f2.8	1/13 sec f2.8	1/15 sec f2.8

Flash Range Test

Digital camera makers have gotten better with their flash-range ratings.
In the early days, many cameras had rather “optimistic” flash
range specs, to put it politely. These days, the manufacturers seem to
be toeing the line. (No doubt at least in part because of tests like this.)
Consistent with our philosophy of testing worst-case conditions, this
test also involves some use of each camera’s zoom lens. Flash range is
greater at wide angle focal lengths than at telephoto ones. If you’re
shooting at the wide angle end of the lens’ range, you might get better
flash range than what’s shown here. – But you’ll never get a nasty surprise
if you let the test shots below be your guide to flash capability.

Manufacturer-Specified Flash Range
105mm, f/2.8
20 feet ISO 200

Resolution Target

Because the critical elements of this target now appear as part of the
Multi Target above, we no longer shoot standalone images of the Resolution
Target.

Viewfinder Accuracy/Flash Uniformity

Viewfinder accuracy is an important parameter, especially for shots
where framing is critical. The optical viewfinders on most digital cameras
match the (poor) accuracy of those on film cameras, typically showing
only about 85% of the actual final frame area. It’s likely that this is
a deliberate design choice by the camera engineers, to help avoid users
accidentally cutting off the heads of their subjects. We disagree with
this approach, or at least feel that it should be mitigated a bit, perhaps
by increasing the accuracy to 90 to 95%.

Unlike the optical viewfinders, the LCD viewfinders on most digital
cameras tend to be quite accurate. There are exceptions though, and it’s
unfortunately not uncommon to find an LCD monitor that only shows 90%
or less of the final frame.

Things to look for on this test chart are:

• Optical and LCD viewfinder accuracy: When we shoot this target
  in the studio, we line things up so the bold black outline on the target
  is just visible at the edges of the viewfinder frame. The resulting
  photo then very directly shows how accurate the viewfinder is.
• Flash Uniformity: The flash units on many digital cameras don’t
  illuminate the scene very evenly, especially at wide angle focal lengths.
  We also shoot the viewfinder target with the flash enabled, so the last
  photo here shows how uniform the flash is.

Optical Viewfinder

LCD Monitor

Flash