Ricoh GR III vs Canon EOS M200

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Ricoh GR III vs Canon EOS M200

APS-C 366.6mm²
24.2 megapixels
28.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Ricoh GR III Review.
How does it shoot? Ricoh GR III in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the GR III.

APS-C 332.3mm²
24.1 megapixels
ISO 100 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Canon EOS M200 Review.

Buy From

Differences

Ricoh GR III advantages over Canon EOS M200

Larger sensor
APS-C vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Integrated ND filter
Yes vs No
Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
Hot shoe
Hot shoe vs None
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Optional anti-aliasing filter
Optional vs Fixed
Lets you choose sharper photos or reduced moiré
Longer exposure
1200 vs 30 sec
Long exposures for night shots
Higher extended ISO
102400 vs 25600 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Canon EOS M200 advantages over Ricoh GR III

Focus peaking
Peaker vs Non-peaker
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Less expensive
$449 vs $897*
Save money for lenses or accessories
Shoot 4K video
4K (UHD) vs 1080p
Make sure you have a fast computer
Tiltable Screen
Tiltable vs Fixed
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

315 vs 200 shots
Capture more photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
HDMI out
HDMI out vs None
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Faster JPEG shooting
6.1 fps vs 4.3 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Faster RAW shooting
6.1 fps vs 4.1 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Slow-motion videos
Yes vs No
Shoot slow-motion videos

Similarities

Common Strengths

Rear display
Both provide
Review photos on the back of the camera
Touchscreen
Both provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Built-in Wi-Fi
Both provide
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Both provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Both provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Common Weaknesses

Tilt-swivel screen
Neither provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Eye-level viewfinder
Neither provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-camera panoramas
Neither provide
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
External Mic Jack
Neither provide
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read GR III User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Ricoh GR III

Ricoh GR III

All GR III Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Canon EOS M200

Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Black)

Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Black)
Kit with 15-45mm Lens (White)

All EOS M200 Deals

Review Excerpt

We haven’t finished our review of the Ricoh GR III, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Ricoh GR III Shooter's Report

We haven’t reviewed the Canon EOS M200.
Read our Canon EOS M200 Hands-On Preview

The Competition

Compared to Canon EOS M100

Ricoh GR III

Canon EOS M100

$945
APS-C

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$449
APS-C

Less expensive
Focus peaking

Compare Ricoh GR III vs Canon EOS M100

Canon EOS M200

Canon EOS M100

$559
APS-C

Shoot 4K video
Newer

$449
APS-C

NFC

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Canon EOS M100

Compared to Fujifilm X-A5

Ricoh GR III

Fujifilm X-A5

$945
APS-C

In-Camera Image Stabilization
Fast startup

$499
APS-C

Less expensive
Focus peaking

Compare Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm X-A5

Canon EOS M200

Fujifilm X-A5

$559
APS-C

Slower slow-motion

$499
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Fujifilm X-A5

Compared to Fujifilm X-A7

Ricoh GR III

Fujifilm X-A7

$945
APS-C

In-Camera Image Stabilization
Integrated ND filter

$850
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Focus peaking

Compare Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm X-A7

Canon EOS M200

Fujifilm X-A7

$559
APS-C

Slower slow-motion
Longer video battery life

$850
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Fujifilm X-A7

Compared to Fujifilm X-E4

Ricoh GR III

Fujifilm X-E4

$945
APS-C

Less expensive
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$849
APS-C

Focus peaking
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Ricoh GR III vs Fujifilm X-E4

Canon EOS M200

Fujifilm X-E4

$559
APS-C

Less expensive
Internal flash

$849
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Fujifilm X-E4

Compared to Sony ZV-E10

Ricoh GR III

Sony ZV-E10

$945
APS-C

Integrated ND filter
Thinner

$698
APS-C

Focus peaking
Shoot 4K video

Compare Ricoh GR III vs Sony ZV-E10

Canon EOS M200

Sony ZV-E10

$559
APS-C

Less expensive
Internal flash

$698
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Sony ZV-E10

Compare Other Cameras?