Olympus 25mm f/1.2 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED
Lab Test Results
November 04, 2016
by Andrew Alexander
Olympus announced its first 25mm prime lens for Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras back in 2014 with the lightweight 25mm ƒ/1.8 lens, a classic 50mm (eq.) focal length with a decently bright ƒ/1.8 aperture. But, if that isn't fast enough for you though, a new option is now available -- the 25mm ƒ/1.2 Pro M.Zuiko Digital.
The 25mm ƒ/1.2 Pro, one of the newest additions to their growing professional-grade Zuiko Pro line, offers the fastest aperture available in any Olympus lens so far. However, at a sticker price of US$1,199, it's definitely available at a premium. The price tag is justified by the impressive amount of glass making up the lens -- 19 elements in 14 groups, including 1 aspherical, 1 SED, 2 ED, 1 E-HR, and 3 HR elements.
The lens is available now, accepts 62mm filters, and ships with a round lens hood.
The lens does not disappoint: it is very sharp right out of the gate at ƒ/1.2 and offers tack-sharp edge-to-edge sharpness by ƒ/2. You can stop down further if you want, but it doesn't garner substantially more image sharpness. Olympus has figured it out -- this is a lens that people will buy to shoot at ƒ/1.2, and you get your money's worth in that regard.
Diffraction limiting starts to set in at ƒ/11, but you'd be hard-pressed to notice it -- at ƒ/16, you may note a slight generalized softness, but then, at ƒ/16 this lens performs about as well as some lenses do at their best settings.
There is a slight amount of chromatic aberration to deal with, but it's mostly present at wider apertures and in the corners: there is a very slight amount of magenta fringing in areas of high contrast.
As you'd expect with fast primes, there is some corner shading evident when using the lens at its widest apertures. In this case, at ƒ/1.2, the extreme corners of an image shot with this lens are about 2/3 of a stop darker than the center of the image. Stopping down reduces the amount of corner shading, and by ƒ/2 and smaller, the corners are a quarter-stop darker or less.
There is a very small amount of pincushion distortion evident on images shot with this lens -- nothing that a light amount of correction in any post-processing program couldn't take care of.
The Olympus 25mm ƒ/1.2 uses their MSC (Move-Still-Compatible) technology, making the lens fast and near-silent to autofocus; the lens focuses between close-focus and infinity in less than a second, and short changes in focus happen almost instantly.
Since focusing is an electronic fly-by-wire system, autofocus results can only be overridden on Olympus bodies by setting the focusing mode on the camera to "S-AF + MF" mode and rotating the focus ring at any time. Rotating the focus ring in normal S-AF (single-shot AF) mode does not change focus. Of course, full-time manual focus is also available, either by pulling back on the focus ring or by selecting Manual Focus mode in the camera menu.
The lens is completely internally focusing, and during AF, the front element does not extend or rotate, making accessories such as circular polarizers easy to use with this lens.
The lens is not designed for true macro photography with a only a 0.11x magnification factor. However, with a minimum focusing distance of just 30cm (around 12 inches), the Olympus 25mm ƒ/1.2 provides good close-focusing performance for a 50mm equivalent prime.
Build Quality and Handling
The Olympus 25mm ƒ/1.2 M.Zuiko looks and feels like a premium offering, with a design that's in-line with other Zuiko Pro lenses. The sleek metal body feels very solid and well-built with a fully weather-sealed construction like the other 'Pro' models, and includes a gasket seal around the lens mount.
Despite being a Micro Four Thirds lens, it's fairly big and somewhat heavier than we're used to for a MFT prime, weighing in at around 14.5 oz. It is a natural fit, though, with the larger bodies like the EM-1 Mark II, but is a bit heavy for the smaller Micro Four Thirds cameras. The lens uses a complex design: 19 elements in 14 groups. The diaphragm features 9 rounded blades to provide very pleasing out-of-focus results.
Other than the focus ring with characteristic push-pull clutch mechanism for AF/MF switching, there is only a single button, the "L-Fn" button, which allows the user to program a function for instant access. Otherwise, all lens functions are controlled by the camera. There is a very nice distance and depth-of-field scale, which is exposed when the lens is placed into manual focus mode.
The focusing ring is plastic with raised ribs, about 1 1/4 inches wide, and has a nice tactile feel to it. Since Olympus Micro Four Thirds cameras use a fly-by-wire system, the focusing ring will turn forever in either direction while the ring is in 'AF' position. However, when pulled back for manual focus mode, the focus ring does feature hard stops.
The Olympus 25mm ƒ/1.2 M.Zuiko accepts the LH-66B lens hood. This round hood is ribbed on the interior, and reverses to attach to the lens for storage. It is 1.5 inches long.
Olympus 25mm ƒ/1.8 M.Zuiko Digital ~$400
If you'd like to stay in the Olympus camp but don't want to spend $1,200, this lens is available at a third of the cost, however you're giving up a full stop of light-gathering ability. Optical performance is very similar, though there are a few practical items that are also not present in this lens, such as the L-Fn function button and weather-sealing.
Panasonic 25mm ƒ/1.4 ASPH LEICA DG SUMMILUX ~$600
Panasonic also offers a fast prime in the 25mm focal length, and it performs exceptionally well. For half the price you're only giving up 1/3 of a stop, but like the Olympus above, you're also giving up some fit and finish.
Panasonic 25mm ƒ/1.7 ASPH LUMIX G ~$250
The least expensive way to get into the 25mm category for Micro Four Thirds, the Panasonic 25mm ƒ/1.7 performs extremely well, and is the most economical.
This is a premium lens that yields exquisite results. It may have a premium price, as well, but fortunately, it's worth every penny, providing optical performance worthy of the price tag. Generally, you know if you need a lens with this huge aperture size, and it's not for the faint of heart. At ƒ/1.2, the depth of field is razor-thin and the results are fantastic. Shooting at ƒ/1.2 demands a strict technique, but the resulting images are worth it.
The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens.
As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a range of focal lengths, and at both maximum aperture and ƒ/8. For the ''VFA'' target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. To avoid space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the test shots launch in separate windows.
Olympus 25mm f/1.2 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED
Olympus 25mm f/1.2 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED User Reviews
10 out of 10 points and recommended by Valdai21 (6 reviews)- Well build - Very sharp - Smooth bokeh especially wide open - Very nice rendering - Focuses quite close - Fast to focus- On the heavy side for a micro 4/3 lens - Expensive - Significant sample variations
I tried this lens a few years ago and sent it back because it showed huge decentering until f/8, at an unacceptable level for a pro lens this price.reviewed February 5th, 2021 (purchased for $500)
I got my current sample second hand and it's much much better. While the 17 and 45mm are still sharper by a small margin, the 25mm is tack sharp across 95% of the frame wide open and almost doesn't need to be stopped down. f/2,8 looks the same as f/8 except for depth of field.
What I really like about it is it's drawing especially wide open. It may be the most interesting of the three. Bokeh at f/1,2 is beautiful, soft and creamy, definitely the best rendering I've seen from a standard micro 4/3 lens. It's perfect for portraits and everyday life. Another thing I like is it's close focus ability. Paired with this great delicate blur, it's useful for artistic pictures of flowers and small objects.
It's not a small lens but not bigger than most APS-C glass. It's the right size for my E-M1. I'm also very confident about Olympus build quality. It's an investment but it's one of the best lenses you can get for this system.
10 out of 10 points and recommended by squirelonsteroids (8 reviews)Image quality, speed, build, priceNothing
***UPDATE ON BOTTOMreviewed November 3rd, 2016 (purchased for $1,600)
Absolutely amazing lens. It is sharped on 1.2 than Zuiko Digital 50 F2.0 at F2.0.
Bokeh transition is gradual and fine like milk. There is no nervousness, or jerkiness.
The lens is not heavy or too big. It feels great. it's weight stabilizes the shot. Too small lens doesn't provide good hand-grip area.
DoF is great - meaning you get enough of it. about 2-3 times more than ZD 50 at 2m wide open.
Lens exhibits no practical CA, no distortions, no practical vignetting, no practical flare.
With this, and E-M1 or comparable camera it is possible to shoot at ISO 200 in almost any condition.
Camera default speed for this lens is 1/60. You can shoot without any fear of shake at 1/10 or 1/15.
MF clutch works brilliantly.
And if someone complains about price - this lens is actually cheap. It is a professional tool, built like a tank, optically flawless, focuses like lightning, etc...
Yes, there is PL 25 1.4, or old PL 1.4, but those are not weatherproof, and flimsy build and focusing. A nono for work.
*I see they tested 25 1.2 on GX1 - that produces images opf worse sharpness and exposure than on pro bodies like E-M1 (GX1 has a Low Pass filter). Also, E-M1 automatically removes CAs (on most any les), so you can espect much better results if you use E-M1 or M1 mk2. IR sample images are very bad, and regardless of positive review, they don't paint the correct picture about this lens. Details you will get from E-M1 or comparable camera RAW files are simply unbelievable. Try seeing some samples on Steve Huff site.