dda's reviews
-
Olympus 12-60mm f/2.8-4 ED SWD Zuiko Digital
10 out of 10 points and recommendedSharp - extremely sharp / build qualitynoneI sold my Olympus gear and went over to the Nikon side - two things I miss however : my 12-60 and my 50-200.
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $750)
Both lenses were perfect ...
If it wasn't for their SLRs, I would still be with Olympus. The lens quality is just ... awesome. -
Olympus 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko Digital
10 out of 10 points and recommendedMonster that takes tack sharp picturesIt's a bit heavyLeft the Olympus camp for Nikon - do however loved this lens and the 12-60. Got it for a cheap price.
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $500)
Tried the SWD version. Preferred this one based on the price. Technically it's even a bit faster on some of the focal lengths (due to the SWD engine in the newer version they had to give in a small (read very small) % of speed).
If you find one at the price I paid, don't hesitate ... go for it ! -
Sigma 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro
10 out of 10 points and recommendedSharp - sharp - sharpautofocus is slooooowGot lucky and found a cheap one.
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $300)
Bought it based on the reviews I found. Was thinking of the Nikon 85 as a portrait lens, but decided to go for this one.
Apart from the sloooww focus (it is slow), a killer lens ! -
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
9 out of 10 points and recommendedprice / build quality / ease of useNeeded a cheap wide angle (don't use this type of lens a lot as I have the nikon 16-85) - love it and ... still don't use it enough LOL
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $350) -
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor
9 out of 10 points and recommendedall has been said about this little plastic wonder ...happy with it !
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $110) -
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR DX AF-S Nikkor
9 out of 10 points and recommendedGood build Q / Sharp / Perfect for normal useNot the fastest, but in combination with my other gear, perfect for all round situations.
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $550)
Built Q is fine, but I stepped over from Olympus and I do have to state that Nikon should aim to do better here. -
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED VR AF-S Nikkor
9 out of 10 points and recommendedRange / overall Q300 mm - I nearly never take it there ...Happy with it - love the VR - the combo with the D7000 is a winner for me
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $550) -
Olympus 70-300mm f/4-5.6 ED Zuiko Digital
8 out of 10 points and recommendedgood average zoom lensbuild qualityI sold it after 4 months and went for the 50-200 non SWD - overall it's a good lens, but if you watch ebay for the 50-200, you might find one for a cheap price - go for the big one ...
reviewed July 18th, 2011 (purchased for $400) -
Panasonic 25mm f/1.4 ASPH LEICA D SUMMILUX
10 out of 10 points and recommendedlight/ sharpa bit fat with the lenshoodVery sharp / ideal 50 mm FF alternative
reviewed December 25th, 2012 (purchased for $450) -
Panasonic 100-300mm f/4-5.6 ASPH MEGA OIS LUMIX G VARIO
9 out of 10 points and recommendedcheap / good image qualitysoft starting from 250 mmI really like this lens - image Q is very good - suits my OM-D perfectly
reviewed December 25th, 2012 (purchased for $400) -
Olympus 45mm f/1.8 ED M.Zuiko Digital
10 out of 10 points and recommendedperfection in a little plastic barrel ...it's tooooo prefectAll is allready said on this little diamond (and it is correct !)
reviewed December 25th, 2012 (purchased for $300) -
Olympus 12mm f/2 ED M.Zuiko Digital
9 out of 10 points and recommendedlight/ sharp/ good built QnoneI don't use it that often, but when I use it ... it keeps on impressing me !
reviewed December 25th, 2012 -
Olympus 14-150mm f/4-5.6 ED M.Zuiko Digital
8 out of 10 points and recommendedall-round lens - good image quality (not perfect, but good)nonethis one is on my OM-D 50% of the time - I combine it with the 12 - pana 25 - 45 and voigtlander 17.5 / happy with it
reviewed December 25th, 2012